A Few Questions To Ask About God, I Mean, Ask Yourself First (19)

Today, let's go back to the origin of the problem and discuss it in a different way.

Remember the first part of this series?

The question we asked at the time was this:

1. Do you think there is a god?
2. Do you believe in God?
3. Do you wish there was a god?

What are your answers to these questions now? But I'm going to throw a new question here:

Should you believe in God?

Of course, this question is the same as the questions I always ask. It is actually a proposition wrapped in layers, but this time I will focus on the "should".

Let's first confirm a few logical realities:

1. Either there is a creator in this world, or there is no creator, there are only two answers, there is no third answer.
2. You cannot prove there is no creator.

Let’s talk about the above two first. Of course, you may think that we also cannot have the existence of the Creator, but there is actually a difference in the validity of the evidence between the two, because the evidence for the absence of the Creator is obviously very weak, and the answer can be obtained from scientific inferences , because "Science itself only creates the next question, not the answer," so taking this path logically leads to the conclusion that it will never be possible to find an answer.

On the other hand, although it is a bit treacherous, theology itself will naturally provide the answer. You have to say that there is no actual evidence... But in terms of logic, it is the only logical answer, and I have stated the conditions above, that is, only talk about logic .

Yes, theology is logical, this is a common misunderstanding, but theology is super logical -- in other words, if the theology you say is not logical, then the theology you say may be faulty, in other words, in the end it is Depends on the theological content.

In short we can see a selection graph:

In fact, as far as the most basic risk management is concerned, it is necessary to prove that there is no god (by the way, in the definition here, only the creator level is qualified to be called a god, and some great men, giants, elves, etc. are just creatures , does not meet the strict definition of God) is much more difficult, so believing in God is at least a strategically advantageous route.

I'm not telling you what religion you should believe in here, I'm just telling you that choosing to believe in a god is a better strategy.

Now comes the more serious question:

Believing in a God and believing in this God are two different levels of belief.

Yes, this is the next issue to be concerned about. I believe that there is a god in the world. In fact, many people believe this, but they just "ignore it", because some people think that "God doesn't control people", and they believe in God. It involves the question of " what kind of god is that ?"

Of course, these are actually discussed in the previous articles. You can go back and look at the old articles yourself, because human beings, or we, or you, are the Creator's unintentional, coincidental work, or the Supreme One has already You have arrangements, and this is indeed a topic worth discussing.

But no matter what you think (not the facts, but your thoughts), in a word, you can use this matrix to look at it. That is to say, finding an object of belief is still a relatively favorable direction of operation - just ignore yours first. Motivated.

In fact, research on the elderly in various countries shows the same results, that is, the elderly with religious beliefs have higher life satisfaction and happiness, and lower fear of death (as for the difference in death issues between different religions, because it may lead to religious disputes) , it seems that few people dare to do relevant research, but there are significant differences in my own observations, and the differences are extremely obvious).

Well put it this way, young people are indeed less likely to think about this topic (unless they are interested in philosophy, I am not talking about those instrumental philosophies that are actually just psychology and sociology, but real philosophical ideas), but whether you No matter how the day goes, the final result is the same. Therefore, there are so many people who have iron teeth all their lives. They only start to think about what to do when they die. This is also a common problem in practice, because so many people feel that waiting People who are dying to think about it.

It can only be said that many people now encourage everyone to learn investment and financial management while they are young, but they never thought that the biggest investment in your life is actually your own soul, which is really a pity.

The first thing you should clarify is actually your own beliefs, because this is the most important investment object, which is to give yourself a better understanding of theology.

You must know that even so, theology only stops at the level of "knowledge", and it is not enough, because money is just "legacy" if it is not spent. Likewise, theological understanding is useless if it is not implemented in life.

So it's not enough to think about this and the truth earlier, not to mention that there is no threshold for "seeking the Tao". At least in my Xie Lie article, it should be enough for you to think for yourself as long as you know the words. It does not involve anything profound and difficult. .

I just tell you with logic .

As for the clues He gave to the world and how to know Him, we will talk about it again.

I haven't even told you which religion to believe in! Because that is what you should compare yourself (of course, I will also write an article to explain it.)