I'm in Matt City, being a curious creator

Matters has a kind of citizen who only reads articles, does not clap or leave comments. "He went away gently, just as he came gently, he waved his hand without taking a cloud with him."

There is another kind of citizen in matters, that is, they only clap their hands, do not read articles, and do not leave comments.

The first is definitely there, as evidenced by the Matt City author data report. It's not just me, it seems that many people have lurking "iron fans". At first, I would think, how can there be such a low-key person who is willing to spend a lot of time, but is not willing to leave a word or clap his hands. Later, I remembered that for a while, I read someone’s running log on a running forum. He wrote it as a habit, and I read it as a habit. But I don't have an account, and I'm too lazy to log in. Most of them read it silently and close the browser silently. He was unaware of my existence, but it seemed that by looking at his parents, there was some kind of emotional connection between me and him.

As for the second type of person, the data report does not reflect it, and it is speculated that it should also exist. Just like social in the workplace, the purpose is very simple and clear. Enjoying the wine is actually acting on the scene, just to sign the list.

If you had to choose one of these two types, which one would you choose?

Fortunately, no one is perverted enough to ask me to choose. It’s okay to not move really, just think about it in your heart. But the second type has no evidence and can only rely on guesswork. The person who clapped hands just now, TA did not leave a message, did TA read the article or not? TA often clapped, but never left a message, TA probably never read. They may also just be introverted and don't like to communicate. But TA is very happy to communicate with others.

If you don't do it, the inner drama is also very annoying.

An interesting point is that in the data report of Matters, all rankings involving real money are vacant. For example, the ranking of readers with the most clapping, the ranking of readers with the most support, etc. Maybe it's because the station still wants to make the matter's high-spirited temperament slightly overshadow Vanity Fair?

If there is a ratio between the number of clapping hands and the reading time, you can probably tell what kind of reader this person is.

I may be a little curious, do you have the same?