around?
IPFS
- To make everyone willing to pay to be around the furnace, firstly, the owner of the furnace has extraordinary charm/fame/aura, secondly, the content is unique enough that people must watch it, and thirdly, the community interaction has a certain appeal. An ideal furnace owner should not only publish articles from time to time, but also actively promote community exchanges. Asking myself is not enough in all aspects, and I prefer social distancing both online and offline, so I still pass it first (unless I find a theme that I want to do in the future/a very fun way to play).
- Seeing the article@I'm not a cat's movie review (see the link), I agree with one point: the fireplace (and even the appreciation of Citizens 2.0) is essentially inclined to star authors, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer (I Know that I know that poor people like me are not good enough). This development direction may attract more star authors to enter and attract more readers to pay for reading, but to use the words of @huitingman, it is "not tasteful". However, I also appreciate @fide's line "Instead of ignoring or fading out when it doesn't feel right, it's better to think about how to play the new toy the way we want. "
- Want to ask @Matty: What if there is a dispute in the furnace? Can the furnace owner customize the rules and even block/catch people? Or should I file a lawsuit with the site? But the furnace friend paid again...
- If I only want to spend USD5 (approximately HKD40) at Matters per month, should I go to two stoves, or should I become Appreciative Citizen 2.0? Here is a summary of the important differences between the two:
- Around the furnace: exclusive articles, community interaction, benefits can be superimposed (ie, add a few more furnaces to read more articles)
- Appreciate Citizens 2.0: Outer Ring of Avatars, Super Like, Allocating Creation Funds to Creators - After reading several opening articles, I remembered that I had read the book "Profit Generation: Do It Yourself, Draw Your Business Model" (Business Model Generation), which talked about how to plan a business. I think there is a concept in it. You can put it on how to start the furnace: don't start from yourself, but from the audience's point of view.
X What can I sell/write? > What does the audience want?
X How do I reach my audience? > How does the audience want to be reached? How should I cooperate?
X What kind of relationship do I want to build with my audience? > What kind of relationship does the audience want to build?
X How do I make money? > What value would make others want to pay?
PS If the creation is only for self-entertainment, only for those who are destined to read it, or if you ask yourself to be full of talents, you will of course have the willful qualification to ignore the readers. - I had absolutely no desire to be around the fire at first, because I didn't imagine an author and subject that I would have to pay to see. It wasn't until I saw this painting interest "Rite" group that I realized that my imagination was too limited. I didn't expect that there was such a way of playing (similar to regular competitions, allowing participants to share the costs of the kiln), which also made me feel that being a kiln Good work, Lord (it feels like a community event almost every month). Expect other furnace owners to discover more interesting ways to interact.
- As a reader, I am a little worried that if I don't get around the fireplace, will I be able to read fewer and fewer articles in the future? Although I know there will be a 24-hour limit, but I don't go to Matters every day, and I may not read all the articles of the day when I come. How many articles I like to read outside the furnace? This remains to be seen.
- Some furnace owners worry that the article has been read during the free period and loses its attractiveness. Instead, I worry about them, no one will see it after putting it in the furnace, and give up the possibility of being associated. SEO Matters is praised by others The strengths of the article, the long tail effect of the article, and even contact with potential new readers , so furnace owners may think more about the separation of articles.
- If you want to attract readers outside the furnace to join, you must have "example texts". Can individual articles be set to be public , like Pateron, or can display half of the content like a square? The current 24-hour exemption seems to be too much about fate. Also, seeing that many furnace owners have put the opening text into the furnace, isn't that only 24 hours for introduction and recruitment? Should the first article be made public?
Like my work? Don't forget to support and clap, let me know that you are with me on the road of creation. Keep this enthusiasm together!
- Author
- More