Do farmers use food stamps in the planned economy era?

Beifeng's writing is already excellent, and there is no need to say more.

However, I also saw the strange remarks of two people under his comment area. The first said "For the sake of industrialization, peasants must be sacrificed, who made prc have no colonies." The second said "the household registration system for five thousand years."

Let's make two points.

1. Does industrialization, especially after World War II, require farmers to "sacrifice"? Do you need a colony? Totally not needed. Just look at Japan and Korea. Global capital is surplus and flows freely. As long as your country has a piece of land with convenient transportation/dense population/national security, then your land can quickly undertake industrial transfer, develop labor-intensive industries from OEM to realize industrialization, Hong Kong and Taiwan Day This is the path for Korea, and it is the same path since India changed its course in the 1990s and gradually abandoned Nehru-style socialism.

In the so-called "industrialization" of prc, the "sacrifice" paid by farmers is not much, but before entering the WTO (to be tolerant, before 1992), it was meaningless, because farmers could not produce enough competitive products, and farmers sacrificed a little bit of accumulation. Most of the poor "capital" has become administrative costs, and a small part has flowed into state-owned factories and turned into uncompetitive garbage that is decades behind world standards. It is the farmers themselves who went to work in foreign-funded and private-owned OEM factories on the southeast coast after joining the WTO.

The so-called "farmers sacrifice the accumulation of capital" instead of "the accumulation of capital depends on the international market" is essentially the dream of socialist economists. This route is the love of the Soviet Union and Latin America for the lack of garbage population in order to force the "industrial cauldron dream". The desperate struggle of the pot people, China has such a god-given land on the southeast coast, and the Han nationality has a large population, which can easily embark on the right path of industrialization. As a result, most of the Han nationality sacrificed more than fifty years for this bastard logic until they joined the WTO. Now that I have embarked on this road, I have carried the burden of countless planned economy eras to move forward. As a result, our nation now has an income that is far from commensurate with its own efforts to support these masters. Originally, under normal circumstances, the average per capita in the southeast coast reaches at least the level of South Korea, so we can say whether the "East Asian model" can finally catch up with the United States. 600 million per capita is 1,000, what else is there to say? It's not that the way is wrong, it's that you didn't walk well at all.

2. The household registration system of prc is more accurate to say that the dual urban-rural system of prc and the different rights of household registration of each provincial unit and municipal unit are also difficult to migrate and change. Is this system a legacy product of five thousand years or is it from Moscow? This is to ask a few questions, is there such a household registration system when roc? Can Chiang Kai-shek and kmt even think about it, can they establish and maintain this household registration system to prevent farmers from flooding into cities? Would it be possible to maintain this household registration system if the Han dynasty ruled in the 18th and 19th centuries? In "Red Rock", how did Sister Jiang's mother come to Chongqing? Does the normal government of the Han nationality have any administrative "possibility" to establish such a household registration system?

Without mentioning the merits, we can bluntly admit that all the reasons and possibilities for the emergence of this system in mainland China with a large population came from your vanguard. Since you think this system is good and good, the Han people will never be able to industrialize if they don’t follow this path, why don’t you put “this system was brought by our vanguard, and the Han farmers without the vanguard are not so “lucky” at all? speak out?

Author: Voice of Han