In response to comments on last night's article and seriously about my fireplace

First of all, I must not forget that I would like to thank the nine friends who supported my article " Readers are the soil of creators - but what if it is bad soil " yesterday. Including: @Sunshine with my heart @Uncle Yideng@Cherryyoko Cherryyoko @ Kiryu Maoyu @M@DanielsonIn the Kingdom of Fairytale Denmark@Ma Sigao @张云志和@IrisChen.

Let’s get down to business and respond to some of the interesting points we’ve received about the above article. Regarding yesterday's article, I saw the following points in the response column, and thought it was worth expressing my thoughts:

First, there is a group operation in Matt City, which squeezes the living space of high-quality articles. In fact, I don't know if there is a gang here, because I don't know the gangs mentioned by others at all, let alone have the opportunity to see what they say in private. I only say what I have seen: the works of public scholars, columnists, and independent journalists who have knowledge, insight and excellent writing have been ignored for a long time; on the contrary, some things that have nothing to do with creation are not touted. This is what I have observed for a long time as a reader. I'm also too lazy to care if there is a team operation. I just want to find more sincere readers so that the creative ecology is not so distorted.

Second, those who appreciate the fact that citizens work together in groups in order to earn back their costs. This is a great misunderstanding of the appreciative citizen and must be cleared up. Appreciate the citizens who took the lead in giving out five dollars a month when various platforms were still open for free reading, and then graded the works that were applauded with the likecoins bought for five dollars a month with their own hands. The five dollars is an additional source of gold in addition to the creation fund, and it is also a source of additional income for creators. When many platforms still open works for free reading, it is completely altruistic to appreciate citizens taking the lead in giving money to support their favorite works. If they only cared about their own interests, they could just be free likers, applauding others for the creation of funds, and then waiting for others to re-shoot with the generosity of creation funds.

Third, there has always been darkness in society. It’s better to look at it if it’s useless to say anything. This is the view that arises from common fatalistic thinking. But my own experience and vision tell me that we have many better options than fatalism. In the third season of Matt City's community activities, there is a new treasure hunt activity to encourage citizens to discover and promote good works. When did it start? I can say that, long before this event, I opened the "Lesi Pavilion" here, and I have been writing essays and curating high-quality works for about half a year. Of course I can't say I'm the only one doing this. But I really believe that with the addition of such an event here, my ongoing curatorial efforts have had some impact! Two days ago, "Coffee Corner Selection of Le Si Pavilion" recommended a piece of writing from the era related to Hong Kong. The next day I saw the piece I recommended was put into the essence of the website. How satisfied I was at that time. ! Even with so much satire in yesterday's article, there were more than 200 applause, and nine friends really liked the support. Is it really useless? I am confident in this regard. Since the things I write and the actions I take can get attention, this is the luck that God gave me, and I believe that God gave me this luck, and I must use it properly to promote good changes.

Finally, let's talk about my fireplace. I, around the furnace, welcome readers who love works on public issues, works on cultural issues, and works on the times to join us. We will share the works you have read and feel intellectual and insightful in the furnace, and exchange what you have read together. The most important thing is that through communication, it is easier for us to discover high-quality works, and we are more motivated to get more attention and support for those authors who can produce high-quality content but are not keen on socializing, so that they retain the reason to stay here and continue to write. On the other hand, I do not welcome people who are not interested in the above works, and who are not sincere to take action to contribute to the balance of the creative ecology. Yesterday's article had a comment from one of the users, but didn't give my article a clapping. I've seen someone's article, and their point of view is that casual words or even live streaming are creations. Obviously that user's point of view is very different from mine. But the strange thing is who tracked my perimeter. Since I don't agree with the need to support quality creation, why track my furnace? My judgment is, who is not the person I am looking for around the stove, and my stove is not suitable for this person. My attitude is if you are the one and I don't want to pursue subscriptions and tracking numbers. I have sent two broadcasts in a row to persuade him to cancel the tracking, hoping that someone will soon. I don't have much patience. If I see it tomorrow on my still tracking list, I'll take the next step. Indecent reprimand! .