Randomly interpreting your Matters data

When browsing the new article, I was attracted by the long-tail effect of this [Data Analysis] 𝓜𝓪𝓽𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓼 . Of course, I was first attracted by the Matters font of this dragon and phoenix dance. After that, I don’t know why I thought of the long-tail effect in some strange place, and it turned on. It doesn't seem so.

After reading the analysis, I naturally hurried to explore the long tail effect of my article. My own impression is: in the period of frequent posting, the long-tail effect of a single article depends on the pros and cons of the next article. If the latter article is well written, the first two articles will continue to earn applause or even support, otherwise it may be Will be dying on the third day.

As for now, with only six articles from January to now, the madness has passed, and the current clap period for a single article will end in about 24 hours.

However, there are also some articles that are still posted a month later or even 6 or 16 months later. Most of these articles are comments on the CCP. The people who applaud are probably Internet refugees inside the wall, all searching for the same type of articles.

After the actual data came out (that is, the table above), I found that I couldn't make any effective interpretation at all, especially the 80% reference line, which seemed to have any meaning, but in my eyes it was a stupid clause, and people who are not smart enough are Incomprehensible (tears).

Now that the uncle has a series of topics, I continue to go back to other reports. The first is this [Data Analysis] Is there a prime time for M̻a̻t̻t̻e̻r̻s̻? (By the way, this font is really good) , this article talks about the correlation between the time when the article is published and the time when it gets clapped. Before the inquiry, I thought that I would always post around 8:00 in the morning Taiwan time, but it turned out that there was no dead angle when I posted, and there were various time periods. There is no amazing prime time for posting, and I can get more than 250 shots in each time period. Knowing that I have a basic plan still makes me relieved.

Interesting are the two highest periods in this table. I'm not sure what time zone the time on the statement is in, so the prime time could be in the morning of Canada time and the morning of Taiwan time, or the evening of Canada time and the evening of Taiwan time.

Finally, how much is the most cruel creation worth ? As a medium author on Matters, I don't have much expectations for this data. According to the [LikeCoin] creation fund, which range are you in? , this data should include clapping on Matters but not limited to received from Matters?

As shown in the table above, the ranking and the income of LikeCoin have been bottoming out since the beginning of this year. Is this related to the rise and fall of the distribution of the creation fund? The following is the interpretation of the number received and the ranking received.

The first is quantity. Looking back, I published a total of 15 articles in November last year, including a popular community activity article. In October last year, I only published 10 articles, so it seems that the daily distribution fund has dropped from 30K to 10K, which is still huge for the overall income. Influence, October is obviously more profitable than November, and from November and December, the amount of applause can only be flattened when the distribution fund is lowered.

 Note: November and December of last year were supposed to be the highest two months since I joined Matters.

As for both January and February this year, there were only three articles, but there was a huge gap. The simple explanation is:

In January, I also continued the popularity of last December, and one of them was a closing text. However, the popularity was like a cloud, and it disappeared without a post for a month, so it returned to normal levels in February. But frankly speaking, the number of applause received for the three articles in February was not really bad. That may be explained as the number of applauding citizens who helped me applaud was not as many as in January, and the reason for this is probably the implementation of applauding citizens 3.0. .

From the ranking point of view, based on my posting situation, the conclusion seems to be that it is best to rush to the creative value ranking first, but this may also be my own clapping. An author who writes a single top-notch article should probably be in the top 10 without a few articles.

It has been almost two years since I joined Matters, and the number of clapping received fluctuates greatly. The unscientific conclusion is: if you continue to publish frequently, you will receive more. The LikeCoin received by a single article has been rising steadily, but once it is stagnant for two weeks, it will start from the basic market and accumulate again. Fortunately, the basic market can also be gradually expanded (very, very slowly) by long-term operation.

I'm doing random analysis, I hope it will help a little bit. I don't know if everyone's data is still satisfactory to me?

In short, thank you for the toys provided by Uncle Xin (the end was abrupt).

 You can almost read it here! As for the following content that has nothing to do with the above, please do not enter it if you don't like it.

Should you praise Citizens 3.0?

I didn't put this paragraph in the title for fear of being talked about by others.

If you have read this income disclosure article before, you will know that I am someone who is used to monetizing LikeCoin. I just emptied my account before I suspended a lot of writing and posting at the beginning of this year. The more I have a short order, the more I think something is wrong. More than 10,000 LikeCoins in the 21-day freezing period. On the other hand, obviously everyone is still struggling with the credit card verification code at the end of January or the beginning of February? Why all of a sudden, praised citizens for not using credit cards? It really feels like an eternity during quarantine.

The rumor at the time was that 20,000 LikeCoins might be needed to keep the green circle, but my situation is: even after the freezing period, the account is less than 20,000 LikeCoins, so where do I go to make up the shortfall? During the mourning period, I have to take the doctoral course upside down day and night, so I really don't have the mood to write articles to collect LikeCoin.

It's not a big deal to have to brainwash yourself from all angles to be an admiring citizen.

Fortunately, after the final implementation method came out, I said that only 5,000 LikeCoins are enough, I felt relieved, and after adding the airdrop, I suddenly had 20,000 LikeCoins on hand. I entrusted it to the verifier in four steps. After I entrusted it, I waited for two days and two nights, but no green circle appeared. After I asked, I found out that I had to entrust it to Civic Liker before I would have appreciated citizens (supporting the forehead)! Fortunately, under the guidance of Liker Land's little helper, it was successfully transferred.

If you ask me why do I have to delegate to get the green circle? The answer is: in any case, he is the author who finally fished out a MAC from LikerLand, a beneficiary of the appreciation of citizens, and it is appropriate to continue to contribute to the entire LikerLand . Besides, they are all defined as "old people", what if they can't even get 5,000 LikeCoins?

As for why it changed from Appreciating Citizen 2.0 to Appreciating Citizen 3.0, just like why it changed from Appreciating Citizen 1.0 to Appreciating Citizen 2.0, I neither understand nor want to understand the real meaning behind it. Anyway, writing on Matters will never be my livelihood. The rise and fall of the distribution amount is the same as the daily rise and fall of the Taiwan stock market, which has nothing to do with my actual financial situation; secondly, there is a real lack of interest in the past and present of virtual currency.

After reading it for 15 days in the past two days, I decided to quit Civic Liker . It was inevitable that I had second thoughts about the commission. The author @ohlak carefully analyzed all aspects of the data and explained in detail why I quit. As always, there have been many related discussions, and the direction has become more and more deviated. There is a high probability that we will return to the old path of which articles are worth applauding and which should not be supported.

I have no intention of continuing the discussion and I don’t have the ability to discuss. As an author who has indeed received more than 5000LikeCoin several times in total, commenting on whether people want to join or quit is not a pain in the back. I have 5000LikeCoin in my account, of course I can say Come up with a thousand reasons why you should join or leave.

However, considering the current distribution volume, not to mention that it is really difficult for new authors to accumulate 5,000 LikeCoins. After reading the above, you will know that even if you have squeezed into the top 10 like me, it has only been two months without serious publication. The author, if you don’t play with liquidity pools, mining, or anything else (I can’t tell you anything), it is estimated that it will take at least 10 weeks to reach the standard.

But the green circle is a community badge after all, a sense of belonging. Of course, new authors want to have a green circle, and it is frustrating not to get it for a long time, so people like ohlak and @Jeger Advocating for direct support of LikeCoin to newcomers is indeed something that the entire appreciative civic community can come to celebrate.

So, if you have read this patiently, and if you are still struggling to join the Appreciation Citizen 3.0, please leave a message and invite me to read your article. Although you have a small amount of money in your LikerLand account, you can sponsor 10 good articles. There are still 100 LikeCoins per article.

 Whether there is a message or not, I still support the good article daily, the Hong Kong dollar or LikeCoin is not fixed, and the amount is not fixed.