Tianjin, a city in China that is best at preventing epidemics and knows nothing but epidemic prevention

Last fall, my daughter was just a month old, and my husband came back from Beijing to take the national exam in the Tianjin test area.

The requirements of the test are: all candidates must provide a negative nucleic acid test certificate within 48 hours (calculated according to the sampling time) before the first test subject test (outside candidates can be tested locally) before they can take the test. In addition to the above-mentioned negative nucleic acid test certificate, candidates who come to Tianjin from other places and who have a history of leaving Tianjin and returning to Tianjin within 14 days before the test must also provide the first test subject issued by the Tianjin nucleic acid test agency within 24 hours before the test (according to Sampling time calculation) The test can only be taken with a negative nucleic acid test certificate.

Because he didn't understand the words "must be provided at the same time", he went back to Tianjin and took the nucleic acid test within 24 hours. As a result, because there were no two nucleic acids, the morning test inspector raised his hand and let him in for the test, and the afternoon test was directly blocked from the outside. No matter what you say or what, the other party only said that it was the request of the municipal party committee, so you should voluntarily give up the test.

Hearing this, I was so angry that my chest became tight, and I couldn't produce milk at that time. My husband was in a hurry outside the examination room, and my daughter was crying in my arms without milk.

I also thought that if I had time to help him take a closer look at the rules, maybe this problem could have been avoided, but the entire requirement did not completely contain the words "exams who come to Tianjin must provide two nucleic acid certificates". wrong? In a place where travel test questions are written, the administrative requirements are written in such a ghostly way.

Probably because of this reason, this time, the Tianjin Examination Institute came out with the unconscionable policy of not allowing "red code" students to participate in the spring college entrance examination, and then learned to write: the nucleic acid needs to be presented twice, one must be nucleic acid within 24 hours before the test, The other one must be more than 24 hours apart.

At about 11 o'clock in the evening on the 18th, the leader threw this link to me and attached a sentence: Article 46 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China: Citizens of the People's Republic of China have the right and obligation to receive education; Article 9 of the Higher Education Law: Citizens have the right to receive higher education in accordance with the law. The word he reposted in the circle of friends was: "Is this a special decision?"

I don't know why, but I'm really numb to this. Two days ago, I was quarantined at home for 7 days because I returned to Tianjin from a low-risk area in Beijing and encountered the change of the Beijing-Tianjin commuting policy on the first day of Tianjin. As soon as the isolation was over, I took the child to the Children's Hospital. I suspected that after she had undergone nucleic acid tests several times, her throat was not very comfortable. When she cried, it always seemed like it was blocked in a place. At the gate of the hospital, the security guard stopped me after reading the itinerary code I took with Beijing*, saying that those who came back from Beijing would not be allowed to enter. I was in a hurry all of a sudden, I said that I just finished home isolation, why not let in. Later, he called the outpatient doctor and finally let me in.

When I went to the security check area inside, I was stopped again because I had been to Beijing. The epidemiological doctor asked the community to issue me a certificate of release from isolation. While communicating, my mother and my aunt at home took the children through the security check first. The security guard saw it and shouted, "Those who came back from Beijing, take them away. Hold!" The thief's volume was no more than that. Later, a person ran over and said that I don't know who said that my child had been to Beijing and could not enter. I was in a hurry at that time, because she had never been there. I yelled at the inside of the quarantine line, "What's wrong with you? When did she go to Beijing?"

Afterwards, the kind-hearted doctor made a roundup and asked the family to take the child to see a doctor first, and I waited outside for the proof. When the people from the neighborhood committee passed the certificate, the child's illness was finished. I didn't go to the hospital, I just came out.

Thinking of this now, my brain still hurts a little. This is still the case in this city with the best dynamic reset, not to mention the blocked Shanghai.

In January, Omicron appeared for the first time in Tianjin, and I have great confidence in it. To this day, I have the same confidence. Because this city is like this, there is a government that treats everyone as a price, and there is no need to worry about economic downturn, because there is no slippage; there are people who do not like to sing against the government, as long as they have food and drink, they can live on, There is no need to pursue freedom and equality; there are also very good medical conditions in the country, because the city has a high level and a small foreign population, the per capita medical resources are more abundant than the first-tier cities, and the overall medical level is also high.

What other city is more suitable for dynamic clearing than Tianjin?

But it's cleared, so what? In the first quarter, Tianjin's GDP was only 0.1%. Even an idiot could see that this was just a fig leaf. In fact, it must have declined. Are we spending so much effort to fight the epidemic, are we living a more active life and creating new value, or is it safe and safe to eat and wait to die, and lie flat and ridicule for a lifetime?

I sadly found that in Tianjin, the latter mentality is the majority, which may be the basis of public opinion for the city to become a "pattern for epidemic prevention".

My friend told me about one of her classmates. After the birth of her child in the first half of last year, she took maternity leave for 9 months and was reluctant to go to work. She was only supported by her husband's salary of five or six thousand in the system. I asked at the time, why did she not want to work and make money? Answer: She said that you have to hire an aunt to work, and that all the money earned is given to the aunt.

This is the kind of person who especially supports clearing. She said that she only considers the health of her family, as long as the society can maintain stability, she doesn't care what the cost of others.

Walking in the shopping malls and roads in Tianjin, most of them are depressed. Many shopping malls have withdrawn their cabinets and have discounts, and street shops have been rented and subletted, and they can’t find a next home. The entire city has no economic vitality, and behind this are companies and individuals who are in a difficult situation. But now, the epidemic has come again, and it is the same again with large screening and partition screening. Regional buses and subways are suspended, and dine-in is stopped.

The cycle goes on and on, and on and on. It's like Don Quixote, treating the windmill as a giant and fighting it desperately.

There is no doubt that China will still clear the long-term dynamic until it becomes "zero risk" - no one can see the hope of such a day now.

I've thought about this a long time ago. Clearing and "laying flat" are two lines of battle, but the world will open up sooner or later. When the cost of epidemic prevention of clearing is higher than the benefits, China will sooner or later vomit all the benefits from clearing at the beginning. come out. If "zero risk" comes too late, the time to pay the price will be infinite.

Who knows whether Tianjin's present will be China's future. It can be considered benevolence.