If calling the police is useful, why write a short essay?

After Fan Xin, Tu Tu, Zong Cheng and others in the publishing circle were exposed to sexual assault one after another, the once-famous screenwriter Shi Hang was also accused of sexual harassment and sexual assault by many women (the current number is 22). After a few days of silence , Shi Hang posted two microblogs, saying that he did not commit sexual assault, and that these women who stood up were his "predecessors"

What a "predecessor"!

Looking at the few chat screenshots he took out, I really don’t know in which time and space these few pictures can show that the two parties in the conversation are in a relationship. This can’t even be called flirting. All I see is offense and defense.

If any screenwriter writes this kind of dialogue as flirting with the hero and heroine, you can see whether the audience will believe it or not.

Are you saying that Shi Hang has never been in a relationship, so he doesn't know what it's like when everyone is in a relationship, or is he just trying to win some sympathy like a mirror in his heart?

I don't think it's all the latter. The output of his screenwriting can indeed reflect how boring his life is and how poor his imagination is. If he says this is his predecessor, it means it is still a book. I have read too little, and I have not traveled much.

Today, a girl came forward and she said, I'll tell you what he did, I'll tell you what he did to me, I'll tell you how I lived after that, but I don't want to give evidence Personal information, I refuse to give up my privacy just to satisfy your desire to snoop.

As she expected, a group of people naturally wanted to say, "Why didn't you show evidence? Why didn't you call the police?"

Here, isn't it "If the police are useful, what do I want you to say I'm sorry for"?

Our rule of law country does not rely on illusions.

Others say that some women should be kept at a respectful distance. Their ability to imagine far exceeds the facts. The pretentiousness of language is the best example.

For so many years, using words as a fig leaf, isn't it the power of the superiors? Do men do less?

Is it scary for women to write a so-called essay these days?

If words can only be used to lay out evidence and not be used to express ideas, then why do those editors sell literary books, and why can Shi Hang advertise himself as a "cultural person"?

What's more, such unbearable language will be called "pretentious", and Xin Qiji, who wrote "The most bitter sorrow, rest to lean on the dangerous fence, the setting sun is under, and the heartbroken place" may also slowly put a question mark .

Even if those words are sensational, even if they are pretentious, otherwise, you ask the person concerned to come out and write a small composition with sincere words?

Don't be like this one, who said it was an "open relationship" when cheating, and asked "Do you like to be offended in the mirror" when sexually harassing. When apologizing, say "I'm sorry for my girlfriend", a relationship is not for your backs.

In such an era where everyone is self-media, writing seems to be something that everyone can do, language seems to really be a tool for eloquence, and emotion is a commodity that can be sold.

But as a literature researcher, what I want to say is: not every language with emotion is called incitement, and not every piece of text with rhetoric is called affectation.

They are all metonyms, but Li Guohua's "You are my best Teacher's Day gift" cannot be equal to Lin Yihan's "the largest massacre in human history is the rape of Fang Siqi".

Shi Hang's "You are my sashimi" can never be equal to Xiao Mo's sentence "The stomach is really big, it is like a yoga ball on my body, and it doesn't hurt if I push it."

These few examples make me laugh. Men always use this kind of "you are my ****" to express their appreciation for each other, while what women experience is not only the fear of being raped by your head and eyes, but also the nausea of wishing to wash the whole body with Fuyanjie .

Seven years ago, Edward Lam asked, "Is writing a kind of eloquence?"

What I think of now is that words may become a tool for eloquence, but only when it loses its sincerity and sincerity. I still believe that words can have warmth, we can touch the beating heart, and smell the filth of predators.

I believe words can be a tool of the strong, but also a weapon of the weak.

Seven years ago Edward Lam wrote:

"Literature is the most futile, and comically futile. I can't save anyone by writing so much, not even myself. After all these years, and so much I've written, I might as well run in with a knife and kill him. Really .I write for eight hours a day. During the writing process, I am in pain and tearful. When I read it after I finish writing, the most frightening thing is that what I wrote, the most frightening thing, turned out to be something that actually happened. And I All I can do is write. The girl is being hurt. The girl is being hurt as the reader reads this conversation. And the villain is still on the signboard. I hate that I can only write."

I really want to tell her, thank you for being able to write, it's amazing.

Literature is not in vain.