In the Kepong hawker's confession incident, I felt very uncomfortable with the sentence "the hawker itself is problematic" plus Huang Mingzhi vs Lin Liying | PodCast

spotify link: https://open.spotify.com/episode/1diDOmbxbpQCA9iMppBP9c

foreword

Did not expect it? I also thought that in the new issue of my new issue, I would tell ybb to sue lsj for topping her, and lsj wanted sunnycoco to apologize to him. At first, sunnycoco was very brave and said that he wanted to go back, but after Lai Caihong gave lsj the platform, he was a fool. Apologize obediently, and call lsj bro.

hmmmm seems to be a little more interesting to talk about. Hey, it doesn't matter, anyway, I just want to talk about kepong hawkers. Next time, let's talk about the love-hate relationship between ybb and lsj.

What happened

There was a young hawker in kepong in the front row who said he was blackmailed by the police. The police said that he had no miti letter and asked for 3,000 kopi lui. After being rejected, he said he suspected that he had hidden drugs in his soup, and dumped him and took it. The soup that came to do business, the hawker finally gave 500 yuan.

A few days after returning to the store, the politician Lin Liying happened to be there to help with the business. The hawker's aunt told Lin Liying about it. Lin Liying immediately held a press conference without saying a word, and then took him to the police, and then brought him to the police. A large group of reporters went to give him 500 yuan of condolences. I heard that the hawker's business was booming after the report.

Since the police have been called, the police have also come to collect evidence many times, and they have also brought hawkers to recognize people, but because the police wore masks when they enforced the law, and the hawkers hadn’t recorded their license plates or license numbers, they never recognized anyone, and there were many police officers. The second time he came to the door and asked for his cooperation, his business was affected to a certain extent. After the police told him that they had certain "evidence", the hawker did not know how to suddenly withdraw the complaint, saying that he made up all of it. story. And he is about to face the defendant's false report.

Later, when Huang Mingzhi saw the news, he felt that there must be a reason for the incident. Otherwise, how could it have turned so badly? He took the initiative to help him file a grievance and bear all the losses caused by his cooperation with the police. After some online publicity, he finally contacted him. The hawker himself, after understanding the ins and outs of the matter, encouraged the hawker to firm up his first confession. After some consideration, the hawker went to the police station to rewrite the confession and used the first confession.

Society needs empathy

I made such a long summary of the previous situation, mainly because I felt very uncomfortable with what the consultant lawyer said in the interview, he said: "I think the problem is the hawker, if she thinks she has no Report a fake case and ask him to tell the judge himself," "It is right for the police not to release the video." Then, because the party was involved, many people who defended the party were sent out to lead the way. If you look at the fb's flank on the party, Huang Mingzhi appeared weak at the beginning when he attacked, and when the party's instructions came out, his waist was full Fight hard.

To me, all of this is the arrogance of intellectuals. A common man, without any background, under the pressure of public power, would definitely prefer to settle down, because it is really too much trouble, you have to face a The largest institution in our country, without clear evidence, can only speak orally, and it is impossible to recognize the person, and the evidence that has an absolute impact on the case is also in the hands of the other party. After many lengthy investigations by the police, your It's hard to get someone without legal knowledge to stand firm.

The beginning of Lin Liying, Huang Mingzhi's persistence

It was correct for Lin Liying to bring the hawker to the police at the beginning, but it was also incorrect, because since you intervened, you should do pre-work and psychological construction for the other party to confirm whether the good things are true, the other party's wishes and details Explain what will happen during the investigation. However, the news reports that can be found on the Internet all show that Lin Liying brought a hawker to report the crime, and he did not do any of the above. The hawker became purely a consumer product, and even affected the hawker's business. You can commit a false report at any time. This is also a perfect re-enactment of the Huang Mingzhi incident, and because of that incident, Huang Mingzhi and the party have various troubles.

The situation of the hawkers is the point

Before Lin Liying did all kinds of pre-work and messed up, Huang Mingzhi took the initiative to take over. In fact, there is nothing to discuss about the whole thing, just wait for the judicial process quietly, because seeking justice for the hawker is itself biggest goal. However, the party doesn't like it, because it will smear the image of the party's savior. All kinds of machines have come out to attack the hawker. He is a liar who wants to hide his lateness. Huang Mingzhi is nosy, and so on. related news messages, you will see how ugly the words are.

Shouldn't populism based on the interests of the people?

It’s the police’s right to keep the surveillance footage from being released. Even if it isn’t released now, it’s okay to release it after the case is closed, right?

Is it a power not to disclose evidence against oneself/disadvantage? Seeing that lawyers who should be neutral or even stand in the perspective of victims to protect and provide valuable legal advice, strongly support the police in their actions to protect themselves, it is obvious that our country has no third-party supervision. Moreover, he even said that the hawker is very problematic. If you want to go to the judge, the problem is, in an extremely professional occasion, how can an untrained ordinary person do professional docking? You did not provide assistance with the legal knowledge you possessed, but arrogantly stood at a high place and sneered coldly, saying that this was for the development of society.

Everything is for social harmony, this... seems familiar?

The social system is inherently unfair. If there is something truly beneficial to the society, the weaker party should be supported to achieve a balanced situation. It should also be your greatest responsibility as a lawyer to restrain the excessively inflated public power. Only fair judges can make correct judgments. You must know that the judge will make judgments based on evidence, and the evidence can be divided into high and low reliability for exclusion, and the younger brother makes a lawsuit without any physical evidence, which one can have the right Do you really need a judge to decide if the police who do not provide or even delete surveillance video provide various favorable conditions for themselves?

As long as the so-called evidence is not submitted to the court to become the so-called evidence, the evidence will not be kept by a third party, especially when there is an absolute vacuum between the withdrawal of the case and the second report, who knows if there will be any Deleting files due to insufficient memory capacity without any backup? .

But in the case of imbalance, you still frequently provide various arguments to support and prove that the hawkers are wrong, instead of questioning the system that public power can arbitrarily protect themselves, and insisting on the so-called neutrality that you think of yourself, this is a joke at all, And all of this is based on the premise that justice is absolutely fair.

Laws are made by people and will be revised according to current social standards. Unreasonable ones should be eliminated and then updated to a set that is more suitable for current social standards.