From "Metoo with Chinese characteristics" to "Chinese characteristics"

Author: Kou Yanding

Editor: Crane bitter frog

 Editor's Note: Due to various well-known force majeures, after being repeatedly deleted and warned, (Sister Kou and the editor) condensed all four or five series of articles into one article in a rage. This series of articles is a systematic response and supplement to Zuowang’s article. In the process of writing the article, I happened to witness the kick-off incident and the birth of two vague statements. The time line dragged on for a month. Still not "reversed". Just wish to keep speaking and keep spreading.

Charity circle with Chinese characteristics

"Chinese characteristics" is a big dye vat. Once the attribute "with Chinese characteristics" is added, the deity will change beyond recognition. "The rule of law with Chinese characteristics" is not the rule of law, and the "market economy with Chinese characteristics" is not a market economy. If a "prostitute with Chinese characteristics" goes back to her parents' home, her own mother will not recognize it, such as "Metoo with Chinese characteristics".

"Metoo", everyone on earth knows, needless to say. The scope of "Metoo with Chinese characteristics" is too large, and it only refers to the recent exposure of Liu Tao's sexual assault.

From "Metoo with Chinese Characteristics" to see "The Public Welfare Circle with Chinese Characteristics"

Liu Tao is one of the rookies who have flourished in public welfare in recent years. In addition to the current post as the secretary general of the Wuhou Community Foundation, there are also many auras and blessings from the founder of "Xinnan", "Ginkgo Partner" and "Qing'er Scholar", and he has been exposed a lot. This is the second sexual assault on women. After the incident, under the personal silence and the public relations response of relevant agencies, it will surely "successfully land". For friends who follow this topic, if you only read one article, the first article will be published on June 26, "How did Metoo let us re-understand the public welfare circle?" ” (hereinafter referred to as “Metoo Circle Text”). This article was published on the meters outside the wall and Douban inside the wall at the same time. Now the Douban link has expired, "This page is no longer there." It turns out that deleting posts is not limited to talking about party-state affairs. What a ghost with Chinese characteristics.

"Metoo Circle Articles" give a complete account of the origin and development process of the matter. From the performance of the institutions involved, it directly refers to the oppression of power, power relations, and "the hypocritical "third sector" community controlled by a small number of elites and capital. The harm of China's public welfare circle.

If a charitable community does not have the slightest introspection on power relations, whether it is dealing with #Metoo, or facing capital and state machinery, seeking advantages and avoiding disadvantages, bureaucracy, and fame, how can there be any progress? Support the weak under social oppression? Or another elite club? In the case of Liu Tao's sexual assault, many people were reluctant to express their opinions publicly because of their old friendship; however, it must be understood that this is no longer a matter of standing on the sidelines, but a problem of the depth of the industry's power corruption highlighted by the incident itself...

That's exactly what worries me.

The author's title points directly to the "public welfare circle". My agreement will not be repeated. This article only briefly supplements the physical problems of the public welfare circle with Chinese characteristics, and talks about the defects in our genes.

In 2018, Metoo exposed several influential figures in China's public welfare circle, which also caused shocks in Taiwan. I happen to be in Taiwan, and many Taiwanese friends talk about civil organizations and social movements, and compare Taiwan to China: "You are now equivalent to our 1980s or 1990s?" Every time I say: China , not comparable to Taiwan. Because we have "Chinese characteristics".

Resource Orientation + System Brand + Elite Monopoly

Whether you call it a social movement, non-governmental organizations, non-profit organizations, NGOs, or NPOs, Taiwan’s resources are endogenous. Whether it’s the leftist movement in the United States in the 1970s or the non-Party movement in the 1970s, the resources are paid for by the Taiwanese themselves. from. However, in the 1990s, almost all of China's funds came from overseas. Because of the foreign funds first, many domestic organizations with overseas funds were born.

After 8964, in the 1990s, "China's efforts to return to the international community" and "the fantasy of the international community to change China" formed a chicken-and-duck marriage. International organizations aimed to promote equal participation and civil society, but related Departments set up relevant agencies for the sake of money. In order to apply to host the 1995 World Women's Conference, the Women's Federation became the first domestic organization to undertake overseas funds.

To undertake overseas funds, you must first have qualifications. Qualifications are given by the party and the state. Who will be the first to spend the money entering China? The "national prefix" foundation has more civil servants than the state ministries and commissions or ministerial-level institutions, and the "Red Cross Society of China", "China Women and Children's Foundation", "China Foundation for Poverty Alleviation", and "China Disabled Persons Foundation" ... until the 21st century . , and there have been jokes like "China Disabled Persons' Federation", "All-China Women's Federation" and "National Family Planning Commission" fighting over "who is China's largest NGO".

There are fewer and fewer Chinese people who can cooperate with foreign foundations entering China. They must not only have institutional qualifications, but also be proficient in foreign languages. After the long Cultural Revolution, the college entrance examination has just resumed, and such talents are more than one in a thousand in China.

Some people would say that Taiwanese social movements are also driven by elites, but this elite is not another elite. Taiwanese elites not only took out their own money, but also took out their own time and life. Since the 1980s, they have entered specific communities and specific factories. , to have direct contact with social issues, and to take root for a long time to become the vocation of their own life. However, too many of our elites have never touched the soil with their feet, and they work on a project-based system. If they have money, they will do it, and if they have no money, they will be game over. The public welfare circle with Chinese characteristics was born with such a brand, which is a genetic defect.

"Civil society with Chinese characteristics" is not a civil society. Just because "civil society" is a high-frequency word in this circle cannot be taken for granted. After the new millennium, the rise of major powers in 2009, the "Regulations on the Management of Overseas Funds", put a noose on overseas funds, and was fed by "foreign milk" in the public welfare circle with Chinese characteristics. It will inevitably lead to worries about "Metoo circle articles", no matter whether the reason for the detonation is Metoo or something else.

The next section, "Public Public Welfare with Chinese Characteristics", continues.

Non-governmental public welfare undertakings with Chinese characteristics

At the beginning of the chapter, please note that the word used in the previous section is "public welfare circle". In this section, special emphasis is placed on "civil public welfare undertakings", which is different from the previous section.

"You don't have top talent in your circle"

So, are there any down-to-earth people in China?

Of course there is. Although this troubled land is always determined by the system and endorsed by the elites, changes in China have always come from the land ("Stroking the Source of the Wind") .

In the summer of 2006, I completed the first book on China's NGO industry observation (later published as " Everything Starts with Changing Yourself "). The manuscript is completed, just as my son finishes his high school entrance examination and is about to face a life choice. I hope he can see the different faces of the world sooner as a reference. I took him to visit some grassroots organizations that do things down-to-earth, and also went to ongoing project sites to participate in person.

The sixteen-year-old boy had a serious conversation with me. He also agreed with my observation, thinking that he saw idealism and down-to-earth, but "it's useless" because "there are no first-class talents in your circle." This experience made his son determine his choice to study science and engineering. , go to the United States to study, and then come back to save the country through science and technology.

I'm sad that I didn't choose a different life direction for my son and me, because I know what he said was right.

What we lack is more than first-class talents

What university to study and how high a degree I have are not my criteria for judging talents, but I must admit that the resumption of the college entrance examination after the ten-year Cultural Revolution has recruited the vast majority of outstanding talents in China, and their life direction is not the third sector. Most of the best went abroad, leaving behind "people from the party and the state", who were assigned to governments and institutions at all levels and entered the "first sector". Later, the threshold for the first sector to have Chinese characteristics became higher and higher. After Deng Xiaoping's southern tour, the whole people did business, and private enterprises and the second sector had high incomes. The strong return of state-owned enterprises in the new century has become a landscape with Chinese characteristics in the job market. Although there have always been non-governmental public welfare people at the grassroots level, it must be admitted that we lack first-class talents, and the choice of the third sector and non-governmental public welfare undertakings has always been regarded as a minority.

While engaging in frontline execution, I also do social observation. I see hope and the possibility of change from endless grassroots activists, and I also see many distressing Chinese characteristics, such as, "people with Chinese characteristics" "Moralization - "moral superiority" and "moral pathos".

Of course, "moral superiority" and "moral pathos" are not unique to the public welfare circle in China. As a post-60s generation born in the Cultural Revolution and more than turbulent, I am well aware of the toxins accumulated in my life by long-term political campaigns, party-state education, manipulated national complexes, and autocratic dictatorships in the details of life. To "moralize" public welfare undertakings. In a country that "rules the country by virtue", too many people are infected with this poison. It is especially troublesome for public welfare undertakings. Public welfare undertakings are inherently moral. Sadness”, poisoning his own life internally, extorting and manipulating others externally, harming others and harming himself.

What grassroots organizations lack is not only money, but also a sense of common sense towards money. Our generation was born in turbulent political movements and grew up in a living environment of extreme poverty. Many things will be written into people's subconscious, or they have extreme contempt for money, claiming to "treat money as dung", and treat money as dung. Hatred and resentment manifest themselves in a "politically correct" way in their work. Or, because of the desire for money in the depths of life, it is particularly easy to be captured by capital, and financial scandals of one kind or another are reported in poor institutions.

The future of Chinese civil society

So, does China's public welfare circle still have a future?

Of course there is.

When it comes to the future, I once pinned my hopes on the future. I hope that the post-80s and even post-90s will not have the shadow of political movements and extreme poverty, and will not have the inherent political fear and thirst for money. When China's economy is more prosperous, society is more open and diverse, and this generation is well-educated, it is not for "applying for funds to do projects", but for facing specific social problems in specific communities and communities out of inner desire, "first-class talents" + social responsibility + inner drive + rooted at the grassroots level", citizens, civic action and civil society are mutually generated, which is the hope.

After the May 12 earthquake in 2008, more and more domestic foundations not only provide poverty alleviation and disaster relief, but also provide civil society support. I am optimistic and speak highly of the “Ginkgo Project” of the first generation. They use their resource advantages to support outstanding talents in the public welfare circle. At first, they were mostly down-to-earth grassroots actors, making them people who are concerned by the society and envied by their peers.

In the process of long-term actions and observations, I have witnessed more and more outstanding young people choose non-governmental public welfare undertakings as their careers and careers, and more and more people have participated in volunteer services. I have witnessed those specific and subtle efforts to change China and warm my hopes for the future. .

However, I overestimated the public welfare circle with Chinese characteristics and underestimated "Chinese characteristics". When more and more government procurement occurs, grassroots institutions begin to be institutionalized and "institutionalized"; when the word "public welfare" is increasingly seen in the media and new media, non-governmental public welfare undertakings are increasingly "represented" , is represented and endorsed by public welfare elites and elite institutions; when more money, elites and elite institutions pour into the public welfare circle, moral superiority and moral tragic are also renovated.

In this context, it is not surprising that Metoo detonated the "public welfare circle scandal". After all, the "public welfare circle is also a river and lake".

 Explanation: I have seen highly educated elite activists practice the concept of civil society, and I have also seen grassroots scumbags who deceive the world. Due to space limitations, I cannot explain too much, and there is no dualism between elites and grassroots.

The public welfare circle is also a river and lake

The theory of Jianghu is due to an article entitled "Pure Land" and "Jianghu" . The author is a public welfare person who has been converted from a media person. He is engaged in industry support. He sees ideals here, and also sees Jianghu. . At a meeting after the publication, it was mentioned that if a young person enters the traditional first department and the second department, it may take more than ten or twenty years to have a dialogue with the top people in this industry, but entering the public welfare circle is greatly shortened.

The turmoil in the rivers and lakes has always been the place where the pure and the turbid, and it can be Vanity Fair, Shura Field, Zhongnan Shortcut, or the Dojo for cultivation. Swaggering, coexisting in a circle.

Grassroots China & Elite Public Welfare Circle

In the 1990s, China opened its doors to return to the international community and attract foreign capital. The dominant Chinese characteristics were overseas capital + elites with institutional background. 2004 " Foundation Management Regulations ", 2016 "Charity Law" , commercial background funds enter the public welfare, the public welfare circle is lively, you can sing and I will appear. This excitement has also brought employment opportunities and well-paid positions, and more and more people with good educational backgrounds have begun to choose public welfare, or move to the public welfare circle from other places. There are too many "excellent talents" poured into the inherently deficient public welfare circle, and many "elite public welfare organizations" as mentioned in the "Metoo circle article", elite talents + capital advantages + blessing of public welfare bosses + business logic operation.

They are not only "entering the public welfare circle", but also "harvesting public welfare". It seems that there is a lively "public welfare circle", various media spread all kinds of wind and water, and various "public welfare stars" quickly become popular, leading the discourse for a few years and then quickly become a separatist regime. On the one hand, the "public welfare veterans", the already silent non-governmental public welfare undertakings are even more invisible and silent.

Some organizations that support non-governmental public welfare leaders, such as the "Ginkgo Project", which was popular and well-received ten years ago, have seen elite tendencies after recruiting iconic non-governmental public welfare figures. The “Qing’or Program” started in 2016 has called the selected candidates “Qing’er Scholars” from the very beginning, which is tailor-made for the elites in the public welfare circle, or in other words, for the elite public welfare circles.

“Metoo with Chinese characteristics”

Several "public welfare elites" exposed by Metoo in 2018 are all "rising stars", "intellectually superior" + "moral superiority", with "specific circles" and "big blessings" behind them, and most of them landed smoothly in the end.

Although Metoo exposes a certain behavior of a certain person, there is a power accomplice behind it, which is an infringement on the weaker party, whether it is sexual abuse of women by men, bullying of discourse power, or Manipulation and extortion occupying the moral high ground.

Metoo was supposed to be an opportunity to reflect and build mechanisms for prevention and punishment. But unfortunately, the most dazzling "landscape" of 2018Metoo with Chinese characteristics is the rapid public statement of "public welfare bosses". After Lei Chuang was exposed to the sexual assault, he first admitted and apologized to a limited extent, and then made various excuses and excuses. The bosses did not express their support for the victim, but for the perpetrator. The reason that can be explained is nothing more than "great contribution to the public welfare circle", and the reason that should not be disclosed: the perpetrators are in the same "circle" as them. When this screenshot was exposed, the "leading brother" did not take the lead in reflection, but strictly investigate leaks.

Another layer of secrets that cannot be said is that the big bosses also exposed sexual assaults one after another soon, and they all landed smoothly in the end.

Metoo will be exposed again in 2020. Individuals and institutions should deal with upgrading, whether it is the perpetrator or the institution involved, they are all familiar with the situation. "The so-called mechanism will only eventually become a refuge for the perpetrator to escape crime." "Metoo circle text" has made it very clear:

In the eyes of these elite public welfare organizations, all this is just public relations required by public opinion. In the end, "Liu Tao's alleged sexual harassment" was only seen as a crisis of "stigmatization" aimed at the public welfare circle, rather than a crisis of introspection and criticism aimed at the current situation of the industry; no wonder these institutions will only take these in the end. The so-called "mechanism" does blatant public relations and cuts...

ass decides head

After Liu Tao's sexual assault incident was exposed,

What we see in these interested subjects is that they evade and cut responsibilities, and disguisely provide a silent shelter for suspected abusers and repeat offenders, the so-called negative evil; and then privately condemn those from the public welfare community. criticize……

It is not surprising that the organizations involved and the big guys behind them, the current reaction and follow-up strategies, are seen in business circles and in officialdom. They are the usual methods of the first department and the second department. Whether it's "Ginkgo" wielding a knife to cut or "Qing'e" kicking people out of the crowd, the manager and the gold owner behind the knife do everything instinctively.

With their intelligence and ability, it's not that they don't understand that doing this is infringing on China's public welfare undertakings, but they still do it. Obviously, that's not what they care about. "Building a better society (Yifang)" and "Let everyone have a choice and a dignified life (Ginkgo)" are just the goals and objectives displayed on the website for people to see, just one sentence.

All the rivers and lakes can be cleaned up from the turbid and the turbid, but the public welfare cannot, because public welfare undertakings are born with the moral orientation of public interest, and the failure of the people in the circle and the failure of the mechanism destroy the public's ideal of public welfare and civil society. trust. In a short period of time, the "Ginkgo Project" alone contributed four cases of Metoo. A single mouse feces broke more than a pot of soup, and it would also affect the "public welfare" pot.

So what do we do? "Show Your Ideals or Be Empty".

Show your ideals or be empty

Idealism still on the road or idealism dead on the road

The tenth anniversary of NGOCN in 2015, the theme of the event is "Idealism is still on the road". For this reason, I specifically ask the post-90s how to talk about ideals in this era? The answer is "ideal is like underwear": it can't be without it, and it shouldn't be shown to others.

Unexpectedly, this wave of Metoo, which was exposed by Liu Tao's sexual assault, has driven the public welfare circle to a dead end.

After Liu Tao's sexual assault incident was exposed, "Xinnan" resigned from his current position, and "Ginkgo" and "Qing'e" refunded the money. This "new star of public welfare" first took full advantage of the popularity and quickly became popular, and all the fame and benefits, obviously "not fighting alone." What he has done has left a comprehensive damage to the public welfare cause, and he has retreated without any punishment. Similarly, "it is not a single person fighting", and there are also unknown forces behind it.

The internal investigation of Ginkgo has been delayed for a long time, but it was announced on June 19 that Liu Tao refunded the money. In the hustle and bustle of the world, everyone in the world can come and go for the benefit of the world, but not for the public good. If these "public welfare leaders" recklessly pointed at Confucius, and regarded public welfare as a repository of their honorary titles and an ATM for public trust, the so-called public welfare organizations that cooperated with them would be accomplices to help the tyrants. Liu Tao fled away, destroying public trust, and the "public welfare circle" behind him died horribly.

The ideal is not impossible to die, it is too unbearable to die like this, it is not worth it.

We cry, not only for our own pain

As soon as the ginkgo cutting statement came out, Anzhu declared that it would not cooperate with any ginkgo partners since then. I understand his distress. Ten years ago, we cried together at a wine gathering in Chengdu. At that time, Ran Yunfei was the host, and Taiwanese and Hong Kong cultural people and friends from Chengdu gathered together. An Zhu and Xue Ye were the only public welfare workers present. An Zhu was alone in the commotion: "After the 512 earthquake in Sichuan, we made two best friends during the disaster relief, Xue Ye and Luo Shihong were both injured and hurt..." First he lost his voice alone, and then the three of us cried together. We cry not only for our own pain, but also for the "public welfare" that communicates with our lives. Now that we are far away from the "public welfare circle", we still can't help but express our anger, for the sake of justice and righteousness.

There is an article exposing the Yifang and Ginkgo consultant team, some people are sentimental and worried that this "passed", I don't think it is too much. This is the public information on the public website of the non-profit organization. Usually, they are honored with each other. When things go wrong, they will both be honored. If you touch someone's head or be touched, you will have to pay a price.

Relevant individuals and institutions involved are so unbearable, what destroys the broken flag of public welfare. In 2018Metoo, I was in Taiwan, and I was in the paddy field in Yilan, and I was stalking the snails. In 2020Metoo, I was in Fujian, and I was in Longyan paddy field. While dealing with the endless weeds in the field, I asked myself: What can I do? ?

Not only worried about hurting innocent people, but also unwilling to write "Tai Chi" by myself. This time, the writing was tangled and long. It changed from one article to three articles and four articles. The second ginkgo statement on July 5th ushered in the tangle. , not admitting mistakes, but playing Tai Chi with word games.

"It's no longer a matter of standing in line"

On June 19, the last ginkgo cutting statement was retweeted by friends and scolded, but less than half of this Tai Chi statement was forwarded. Half of the retweets directly pointed to the crux of this empty statement, and there were also many mythical-level god comments. Some people didn't turn around when the sexual assault incident was exposed, as if it didn't exist, and now immediately forwarded and sought after this vague statement, exuding a smell of deja vu, please refer to the screenshot of a circle of Metoo in 2018 .

I am far away from the public welfare circle that has invested my life and still involves my life. Except for the sunshine above my head and the wind and rain around me, nothing can affect me. Writing such an article is not for coercion or inducement. For the "public welfare" that still hurts my heart. The "Metoo Circle Text" must be quoted again:

In the case of Liu Tao's sexual assault, many people were reluctant to express their opinions publicly because of their old friendship; however, it must be understood that this is no longer a matter of standing on the sidelines, but a problem of the depth of the industry's power corruption highlighted by the incident itself...

Every philanthropist has to face all these harms to public welfare undertakings, and face cross-examination: Are you trying to mix circles, make money, staking a horse, take a shortcut to the south, or practice your ideals and practice civil society?

Two people I don't know must be thanked. "Hua Hua", one of the whistleblowers of Lei Chuang's sexual assault in 2018, made me have to write. The infringer landed smoothly at that time. Two years later, he was admitted to a lawyer's qualification and practiced in a certain firm. He was about to quietly transition and start a new life. Huahua bravely stood up again to stop the joint signature. Every step is to assert that he has failed to get justice, and he is also preventing certain people and certain forces from infringing on the public interest, and he is repeatedly tearing his own wounds. If I leave her alone, I owe this brave girl.

The other is the author of the "Metoo Circle" that has been cited many times, making it possible for me to complete this article. Thanks to the author for sorting out the facts and reflecting on power oppression and power relations, I have completed the most important work. This group of articles of mine is, to a certain extent, a supplement to the "Metoo Circle Articles".

In addition to sighing for the naked public welfare circle, having to show your ideals or being empty, we also have to reflect on our genes and China's public welfare constitution. More importantly, think about how to establish a mechanism instead of relying on human governance to solve problems and restore public trust. "The grass in your own field can only be pulled out by yourself"

The grass in your own field can only be pulled by yourself

As long as there is a way to do it, there is always

On June 19, the Ginkgo Cutting Statement unilaterally put an end to the promised investigation and justice, and I couldn't help but "sigh for the public welfare circle that is underdressed", although it is no longer my circle.

Unable to let go of his concern for "public welfare", he couldn't help but offer advice to Ginkgo people who asked for a plan. As an individual, as long as you want to do something, there is always a way. At least four of the victimized girls have come forward and demanded "disclosure". Since the Foundation has blocked this road and will not give justice, the Ginkgo partners who once stood up and lined up to express their desire to be with the victimized women can at least fulfill their commitments in their personal capacity. Let the victim's complaint not fall to the ground because of the foundation's statement. "Justice is dead, the rescue is open", since you can't expect others to give justice, at least you can make it open yourself.

The method is given, and it is also delivered through various channels. However, my suggestion is that there is no following.

Pushing Metoo to the law is a shame for the public welfare circle

During the writing process, some friends who paid close attention to this matter mentioned "law".

In 2018, many of the whistleblowers mentioned "law" in their public relations rhetoric, and even stated that they would "accountably pursue" the whistleblower's responsibility according to the law. I'm really afraid that the hooligans have culture, that they are shameless, and even more that they speak the law.

The law is the bottom line that cannot be lower, and those who fall below the bottom line will not only be spurned by others, but also punished by the state apparatus. The ideal is the high standard, the upper limit, and the bottom limit of the public welfare circle. If there is any difference between the public welfare people, they are all living beings, but the underpants are different. People who claim to be public welfare actually put up their legal underpants to resist Metoo's moral accountability, which is really a shame for the public welfare circle. It's not that we can't speak the law, but we're afraid that public welfare people will speak the law in this way at such a time. So why not talk about the law? - Talk about ideals.

Philanthropy literally means "public interest". The strongman can hold a knife and shout "Leave the money to buy the road", but if you get into this circle, you have to say a few beautiful words, whether it is to practice the ideal of civil society, or to get a salary to make a job, or to ponder the shortcut of Zhongnan. staking.

Since you want to come here to mix, then first show your ideal - open.

Open + mechanism, people can only do good things

Whether it is an ideal, a personal creed or an organization's purpose, when you come to the public welfare circle, you should always say something nice. Whether it's true or false, let the good words come out first.

Open, expose yourself to public scrutiny. It doesn't matter who you are or what you think, as long as you can only do good deeds according to your own promises in this circle, that's enough. Even if it is a heinous villain, it is enough if he can only do good things and not bad things here.

Where does such a mechanism come from? Stand up for yourself and make a public commitment, and then follow through.

More than ten years ago, long before the USDO was launched, we felt the financial chaos in the public welfare circle. We took the lead in realizing full disclosure in our own organization, which was laughed at as "public welfare financial streaking". No one asked, this is our unilateral commitment and has nothing to do with anyone.

A few years later, USDO launched a Chinese non-profit organization with financial self-discipline and full transparency. At the USDO launch meeting, we shared details, and the practice called "high standard" at the time was written into the rules and became "standard".

"What can we do?"

Not like a friend, I decided not to. After the Tai Chi statement on July 5, I communicated with my Ginkgo partner.

"Now the firepower is all concentrated on Ginkgo. We are wronged, and Liu Tao is watching the fire from the other side and stealing the fun." - Ginkgo contributed so much mouse shit to Metoo.

"What can we do?" - Open + Build Mechanisms.

If you know that the cutting statement is wrong, admit it publicly, don't make a vague Tai Chi statement and add it to the wrong one. Public admission of mistakes is the most fundamental crisis public relations, far superior to all prevarication, justification, and public relations tactics.

Openly set up a column on the website to expose his ugliness, and announce the complaints and handling of Ginkgo partners, whether it is the judicial judgment of Liu Meng's sexual assault or Liu Tao's stupid move of sexually assaulting Ginkgo. The offender's network information is recorded and advertised through network technology. Those who come here to deceive the world and steal their names, good or bad, will go away and leave a voice.

Ginkgo started to establish a publicity + self-discipline mechanism from Metoo. First promote the institutions where Ginkgo partners work to do the same, and then promote more institutions, hoping that like financial disclosure, it will also become an industry consensus and mechanism.

"What else can we do about Metoo?" - Special projects and special teams. Money is neutral, using money to do good deeds is good, otherwise it is bad money. Pay to set up special projects, purchase services, provide professional psychological companionship and legal support to Metoo complainants, and respect the complainant's request for publication. If you want to contribute to the public welfare circle, the support object is not limited to complaints about Ginkgo partners, but also extends to other...

Some people say that these contents are vaguely visible in the Ginkgo Tai Chi statement on July 5, but they are all specious. I know very well how different things are from being a donkey and not a horse, like civil society and "civil society with Chinese characteristics." Getting things done depends on the goals in our hearts.

The rivers and lakes are all mud and sand, why do we come? For the ideal of civil society, or to join the "public welfare circle with Chinese characteristics"? In the face of responsibility, life is not equal. Those who embrace ideals naturally have more responsibilities.

There is no need to justify how tired and wronged you are, and you don't need to thank me. I can only help so far, and in the end it's up to me. I'm going to hang up the phone quickly and go pull the weeds. No chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides are my own unilateral commitments. In order to write this group of articles to waste farming, the grass has grown crazy. Whatever you say is false, you have to take care of the grass in your own fields.

We are a non-profit, independent media that focuses on public issues such as the environment, education, gender/gender, and mental health, and provides responsible documentary content for the public.

Click the link to subscribe to our featured emails: https://jinshuju.net/f/sGicEk