Reflections on the Eight-Child-Mother Incident

This thing is really annoying. Just to record some thoughts here. There are a lot of discussions, but I think it should be a discussion in the public sphere, more oriented towards public power.

one

The most important thing should be the response of the local government after the incident. From the current point of view, it is extremely bad. This reaction period is actually very long, because it has been a long time since the Douyin report. Obviously, local civil servants feel that this is normal and that poverty alleviation can still be done. When things turned to detaining women, what they did was to keep coming out to explain, smooth things out, and say they would investigate. According to the normal reaction, shouldn't it be swift and violent to rescue the mother and child? Not to mention the continuous investigation results, several public statements, etc., many mistakes and omissions and explanations that go against the bottom line of civilization.

The real critics are obviously the civil servants at this level, who embody the deep-rooted evil.

If you want to analyze the reasons, all kinds of explanations based on culture, reality or lazy government are all untenable. I myself thought it was a matter of interest. Everyone knows about it, so everyone has a handle. Such a wide range of crimes must include top and bottom management, and there are interests behind big things and small things. These benefits may not be how much money the city people think, handing a cigarette and a piece of meat or a fine of several hundred dollars. Every civil servant has a share of the oil and water in the structure of rights and interests.

two

If the above goes a step further, then the most responsible public security department will benefit the most. In buying and selling female destinations, that obviously means all kinds of RBIs and fines. In places where women have disappeared, it is also difficult to file a case, and it will also involve a lot of management and power fulfillment. Not to mention, every year, the Ministry of Public Security has a project to fight abduction and missing persons. All kinds of databases and various actions are also a large amount of funds.

three

In recent years, what I hate most about this kind of thing is the way the media does - it may be more sensitive because of my professional field. Those media that were famous in the past, or successfully marketed, occupied public resources, but in recent years, they have become the most deceptive units of stability maintenance. When they are reporting, they are basically unable to interview vulnerable parties and victims. Whether they are unable, unable or unwilling, their sources of information are ultimately the power parties, institutions, officials or persons related to the institutions, etc. Therefore, In the end, the reports turned into official explanation amplifiers of some kind. But they are better at language, reporting and topic selection, so the effect will be better.

Due to their influence in the past and the huge deception brought about by the scarcity of the current media, it can easily become a finalized report result, making readers "Oh, so it is", and the result will lead to dispelling the public opinion or reducing the discussion.

Four

It's already a dead end. But people didn't even find a discussion strategy. This also has the effect of a small hot spot, and there are still many articles and discussions. Although people's speech must be respected, and speech should always be pluralistic. But unfortunately, when no action is possible, speech may be the only action. If this is simply turned into a gender issue, a simple rural problem, a simple crime problem, if it is not continued It would be even more powerless to speak in the public domain and inquire about public power.

five

I have been indulging in pain and hatred for a week because of this. After writing this, I will try my best to keep silent.