FUCKYOU
FUCKYOU

俗爛

Announcement on talk show about sexual assault in Huang Yihao's home of Taipei Quyi Club

In the past few days, Huang Yihao (Taiwanese talk show actor) of Taipei Quyi Club has published some hell-terrier jokes about domestic sexual assault on the Internet, which exploded on the Internet, causing his fan page to be surrounded and suppressed. He also publicly said Welcome to private message him, after receiving the private message, he apologized with a heavy heart.

In fact, this is not the first time that Huang Yihao has made a similar joke. After thinking about it, I decided to write a letter to the Taipei Quyi Club. The following is the full text of my letter, which is directly made public.


The self-proclaimed member of the new generation of the strongest cross talk after the 1980s, Huang Yihao, is actually a talk show actor (should I understand it correctly?), and recently posted a talk show on his personal fan page, but unfortunately I couldn't see the wonderful talk show clip, Huang surnamed blurted out The show actors have deleted the video, because the words in the video caused victims of sexual assault (especially child sexual assault victims and victims of domestic sexual assault) to be highly uncomfortable, and even needed to take medicine. The pictures can be used to see the remarks in the film. As you can see in the attached picture, the talk show actor surnamed Huang said:

"Telling your daughter not to dress too revealing is usually ineffective, and she will be regarded as a victim of the review. I suggest everyone to put it another way: 'Daughter...if you dress like this, Daba will want to fuck you'! "

Figure 1: Huang's talk show lines, causing trauma to victims of domestic sexual assault
<gwsw id="gws-16080909058397462813937">Picture</gwsw>

The apology posted by the talk show actor surnamed Huang later (Figure 2) is even more hypocritical.

Figure 2: Huang Fawen apologizes
<gwsw id="gws-16080909380997646826816">ㄊ</gwsw>

"When I was writing the joke, I didn't realize how the viewer would interpret the joke itself when he couldn't understand the context of the joke," he said, alluding to the fact that the viewer didn't understand the joke he was telling. Context, may I ask, is it the viewer's fault that the talk show actors fail to express the context of the joke well? Isn't it because the actors are unprofessional, unprofessional, unable to write contextual stalks that others understand better, but they insist on using them? Wasn't it his own fault that led to this ending? Besides, aren't the films of actors surnamed Huang put on the Internet by themselves? Did someone upload it for him? Is this also a mistake of his own decontextualization operation, caused by his own mistakes and his inability to professionally control the talk show film?

Also, the actor surnamed Huang said: "I dare not say that I can fully understand the feelings of these people. After all, I have not suffered similar injuries, but I understand these strong emotions and do not allow external forces to touch them." Once again Yes, we see that the actor surnamed Huang is reviewing the victim just like the common argument in domestic violence and sexual assault cases. "These strong emotions are not allowed to be touched by external forces." It is obviously blaming the victim. You are all glass-hearted. It will shatter, and no external force can touch you. So, I think the actor surnamed Huang should ask himself: Does the victim deserve to be touched by you? What are you doing? It is a pity that the actor surnamed Huang did not understand each other's feelings from beginning to end, and it is even more outrageous to review the behavior of the victim just like domestic violence and sexual assault.

The moral and ethical boundaries of talk show actors' use of "hell stalks" have always been a dialectical topic in society. However, talk show actors have no experience of sexually assaulting others or being sexually assaulted. , don't understand" to excuse the "hell" caused by personal jokes (yes, as a friend of mine said: that is not a hell stalk, that is creating hell), is it not responsible? Is it possible to excuse "I haven't experienced it and I don't know"? Do talk show actors "don't need" to do their homework before performing to understand what the content of the jokes they are talking about, what impact it will have, and what ethnic groups are they appealing to and who are the influence groups? Don't you need to know about the ethnic group you are talking about, so you can talk about it freely? If a talk show actor casually googles a victim of sexual assault at home, he must have a lot of information. If a talk show actor surnamed Huang does some homework before the talk show is published, or go to the home sexual assault case first The psychologist understands the situation of sexual assault at home. Can his joke be presented in a more professional and complete way? Instead of this kind of hypocritical words that cause public outrage and arouse the traumatic experience of the victim, you can only apologize over there and say something like "You don't understand my stalk, I don't understand your experience, I'm so sorry"?

It is hoped that Taipei Quyi Club, as an important and key performance community in Taiwanese cross talk and talk show circles, can bring more excellent and good performances to Taiwanese society. We are not demanding that Taiwanese society can only have politically correct performances, but politically incorrect hell terrier performances should be presented to the audience in a more appropriate and comfortable, inclusive rather than exclusive way, rather than causing another wave of unnecessary moral harm, or even The debate over social tearing may be the most essential humanistic concern of performing arts.


I ended up signing with "a man who likes cross talk" and my own name.

Huang also has an article asking why the crowd is so angry (below), which shows that the performer surnamed Huang never tries to understand the crowd he talks about in his talk show, but instead talks about their life, life major events in. And obviously it was a "sexual assault" incident, but he asked "where does this offense come from?" and named himself "I really don't understand why some people reacted so badly", all showing that Huang is a professional comedy performer and blurted out. Show actor's non-speciality. It is a great regret for Taiwan's contemporary performing arts circles that Huang has caused this kind of turmoil more than once.

Figure 3: Huang expressed that he did not understand why "some people" responded so strongly
<gwsw id="gws-16080909908143437580996">Picture 3: Yellow</gwsw>

Also, in Huang's personal apology, he asked everyone not to continue to repost his pictures. Is this what he said in his article: "Please also those who are still distributing screenshots, don't let it hurt other people", or is he? In the message (picture 4), "I have deleted this joke. You guys let the screenshots continue to circulate. If it continues to make other people uncomfortable, I'm not sure whose responsibility it is." The dissemination of Huang Yihao's screenshots has hurt more people. When did it become the responsibility of the transmitter? The communicator is calling for this kind of language not to exist, and the communicator is thinking of the victims of sexual assault at home. On the other hand, Huang Yihao's repeated appeal "Because I have deleted the text, please don't retweet it again. Is the act of spreading the word just to prevent more and more people from seeing their bad words and deeds and saying excuses? Has Huang Yihao really reflected on the mistakes of his personal speech? If so, then why does the word of apology still vaguely imply that other people can't understand your jokes, and there is still no sincerity in the words, and you still have to secretly get stuck, and even quote Zhuangzi's remarks to gain spiritual support for yourself? victory?

Figure 4: Huang Sophis said that it is the responsibility of the spreader to continue to let the screenshots circulate
<gwsw id="gws-16080910420127841760309">ㄊ</gwsw>

If Huang Yihao really thinks his words are wrong, and wants to "sincerely" apologize to the injured people because of his words, why did he delete the article, and why he refused to face his personal talk show mistakes, unprofessional comments in a calm way wrong expression? Why do you ask others not to repost after apologizing? Is this an insincere act of facing personal mistakes?

Maybe we don't have a way to answer it now, and we can't guess.

I can only expect Huang Yihao's follow-up talk shows to have different presentations. Of course, we also hope that Taiwan's performing arts circles, whether cross talk or talk shows, can bring better performances to the Taiwanese people.

CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Like my work?
Don't forget to support or like, so I know you are with me..

Loading...

Comment