Chinese dissidents who deny Trump's defeat reinforce China's propaganda

楊建利
·
·
IPFS
·

BY JIANLI YANG AND AARON RHODES

Many diaspora Chinese who oppose Chinese President Xi Jinping’s policies have supported President Trump, despite his abortive early attempt at developing a “bromance” with Xi. Many have admired Trump as a strong leader who was unafraid to use the economic and political power of America to defend the country, and ready to act unilaterally to resist Chinese Communist Party (CCP) subversion and hegemony. They have appreciated Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s honesty in clarifying the differences between totalitarianism in China and the guiding moral principles of individual rights and freedoms that are America's central political creed.  In general, many Chinese dissidents considered the Trump administration as an ally in their uphill struggle to make the world understand — and to confront the threat of — a fascist, expansionist regime.

But with Trump’s refusal to accept defeat, the wave of political irrationality that has enveloped many of his followers appears to have infected the Chinese dissidence movement and exposed moral weaknesses that need to be addressed if it is to pose a serious alternative to the CCP. Since real political change in China can come only from the Chinese, this problem could have profound implications for the future.

Democracy is not compatible with hero worship and the domination of a society’s politics by any particular personality; in order to function, democracy demands rational reflection and emotionally detached choice. Like all American presidents, Trump made mistakes, although some of his policies were effective. But many of his supporters are unable to acknowledge his mistakes and turned vitriolic.  

Democracy also depends on the peaceful transfer of political authority. It follows that if his supporters believe that Trump is infallible and politically invincible, it should be impossible for him to lose an election. Many Chinese dissidents who are active on social media apparently believe that Trump, in fact, won the election but that a vast conspiracy, in which the CCP has colluded with other leftist forces, illegally overturned the results. 

Civility, including respect for opposing views, is essential in any real democracy. But too many of the expressions by dissidents in support of these theories have been extreme and fanatical. Indeed, many of the actions of some of Trump’s American followers in the aftermath of the election have been intellectually and physically destructive, manifesting a mentality that reminds us of how populations sometimes have reacted to massive psychic setbacks caused by military defeat or natural disasters.  

The Chinese pro-Trump dissident community, like many Americans, appears to be largely in denial. In their search of answers for how Trump possibly could have been defeated, they promote extremist explanations that inadvertently converge with, and reinforce, the CCP propaganda they oppose. Indeed, they are reinforcing the CCP’s grandiose ambitions by claiming the CCP has the capacity to influence local, state and federal election officialdom and American courts. If anyone claims that the Chinese communists managed to corrupt the entire American electoral apparatus, they are saying American democracy is finished — which is exactly what the CCP would have the world believe.

It is not uncommon for political refugees from tyrannies to drift toward extreme and impractical views, driven by frustration that overpowers democratic impulses. Politically marginalized and cut off from possibilities to improve life for their compatriots at home, they feel moral outrage that has no outlet. 

But America’s post-election foibles should offer lessons for all who seek the political freedoms the system was founded to protect. Our leaders are fellow citizens entrusted with temporary and limited powers. There is nothing more essential to democracy than losing an election gracefully and pledging cooperation with the victor. We are all entitled to our views, as long as we do not advocate the violent suppression of others. The self-discipline of citizens must ensure that political passions do not overcome rational thought.  

Let us work together so that Donald Trump’s loss does not become a victory for China’s totalitarian bosses, who encourage and exploit America’s failures to live up to the challenges of self-rule.  

楊建利

Jianli Yang is founder and president of Citizen Power Initiatives for China, a Tiananmen Massacre survivor, and a former political prisoner in China. Follow on Twitter @CitizenPowerIFC.

Aaron Rhodes is president of the Forum for Religious Freedom-Europe and the author of “The Debasement of Human Rights” (2018). Follow him on Twitter @Rhodesaaron.

The Hill

CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 授权

喜欢我的作品吗?别忘了给予支持与赞赏,让我知道在创作的路上有你陪伴,一起延续这份热忱!

楊建利中国山東人,伯克利加州大學數學博士,哈佛大學政治經濟學博士。1989年從美國回国参加天安门民主運動。1990-2002年任「21世紀中國基金會」主席,期间推出《中华联邦宪法(草案)》,2002年4月秘密回國支援工運被捕,後以危害国家安全罪判刑五年,2007年釋放後流亡海外,同年末,在美國創立民主運動NPO「公民力量」。2010年代表刘晓波出席诺贝尔和平奖颁奖仪式。是多项国际人权奖的获得者。
  • 来自作者
  • 相关推荐

中國得益,俄羅斯衰弱 ——專訪民主活動家楊建利

【推薦閱讀】選舉訴訟文獻(九)亞利桑那州共和黨訴州務卿HOBBS等計票不當案

【推薦閱讀】選舉訴訟文獻(八)特朗普競選團隊起訴內華達州選舉人投票結果無效案