Zhang Gaoli's serious illegal and criminal acts should be thoroughly investigated

Those who teach the Fa are not necessarily moral, but those who do not teach the Fa must be immoral. The Fa is the minimum standard. If a person only talks about obeying the law, then he is a social scum, and if he does not obey the law, he is not even a scum, a scum. Generally, the upper and lower sides are effective, if the upper part deviates by one foot, the lower part will deviate by one zhang. Therefore, the leadership should not only teach the Fa, but also focus on virtue. This virtue is concrete, not abstract, but quantified, and not only depends on public morality, but also on private morality. In short, no more serious crimes of raping young girls. Zhang Gaoli has seriously damaged the social environment under the rule of law, corrupted human ethics and morals, and has had an extremely serious social impact. It must be dealt with seriously. This matter is a touchstone. This kind of thing has been so turbulent in the city, we must give an account to the people, and this kind of violation of the law must be explained. Those who are in trouble must be dealt with by extraordinary means, no one has the privilege of breaking the law, and such people must be dealt with severely.

China has always been a barbaric and backward society of human relations, not a modern civilized society under the rule of law. I am extremely disgusted with this backward secular culture. Why does the West stink so much without China? Obviously, this is not a problem of people, not a problem of white skin and yellow skin, blue eyes and yellow eyes, but a problem of people's living environment. I have always said that people are not born good or bad, but are determined by the system. Why does China keep doing things that should be done and not doing things that shouldn't be done over and over again? Because it has always been dominated by maximizing self-interest, ignoring party discipline and state laws, and not following the rules, how can a person who does not even speak the rules let him rise to the height of serving the people? Why are there so many corrupt elements who hold a little power and act recklessly? And this kind of favor is more of a black deal that can't get on the table and under the table, and it is a small circle of people who can't see it. It is nothing more than plotting how to better fight the central government with less cost and greater gains, and bully the people, and bullying the people is another way Indirect confrontation with the center.

The root cause has a fundamental relationship with the power mechanism that is not supervised by the people. A phenomenon that appears repeatedly, commonly appears, and appears regularly is a system defect. The essence of Chinese corruption in all dynasties and dynasties is to form factions in politics, engage in factional struggles, engage in gangs, form parties for personal gain, and create vested interest groups. Economically, it is to engage in land enclosures and land mergers. This is also true in China. It is still impossible to calculate how many vacant houses are there. Local governments, commercial banks and shadow banks are engaged in the transmission of interests, and the central government’s right to issue money is empty. Is it impossible to deal with the fact of issuing banknotes by yourself, using house prices to control the flow of social currency, and maximizing the capture of currency? Are the bloody lessons of ancient times not enough to wake up? In ancient times, land mergers inevitably led to a lack of financial resources. Big landlords and local governments colluded to pay less taxes and pay less taxes. Supported political economy.

In China, Western democracy is meant to check and balance the central government, and these people often wear a pair of trousers with local officials. They have a close relationship of interest community linked by blood, so that one day they will become an economic monopoly like the disintegration of the Soviet Union. Moreover, the essence of Western democracy is money democracy. Whoever has money is the master, and if there is no money, he is a slave. Japan and South Korea have been extremely explicit, and the chaebol monopoly power is not concealed at all. The U.S. government, on the other hand, is doing its utmost servile in front of Wall Street, and the U.S. Congress is a group of capitalist agents. Goldman Sachs Group, the world's largest investment bank, demanded that no matter who takes office, the dollar must depreciate by 15 points before the US election. This shows that the presidential election of the American people has an invisible precondition, that is, whoever is elected will not affect the elephant in that room. I wonder if the American people can see through the hypocritical nature of the so-called democracy advertised by the US government.

Most people are inherently selfish, and if they cannot understand this, they cannot govern the country well. Adam Smith's prerequisite for the establishment of Western economics is that human nature is selfish. Without this precondition, there is no truth to Western economics. I oppose that human nature is inherently selfish. I believe that there is still truth, goodness and beauty in the world, but transforming human nature is a long-term project, so our various policy designs must be based on the selfishness of the majority and the selflessness of the minority. That is to say, the majority of people must talk about the rule of law and the checks and balances of power, while the minority must not only talk about the rule of law but also morality. In short, the party and the government must exercise their power within the scope of the constitution, and this basic principle must be firmly adhered to. Historically, Legalists have minimized the negative external social effects of selfishness by restricting each other on the basis of human selfishness. And some things in Confucianism are good in themselves, but most people who talk about Confucianism just use it as a fig leaf, but in essence they are hypocritical hypocrites.