A recent myth

I have never understood why many people trained in the social sciences or even the humanities (and even history) think that things in our habitat happen and end suddenly and with clear boundaries. Suddenly there is a ten-year cul rev, and suddenly it's fine. Is it possible that the entire group of such a large size was invaded by aliens? Emergencies? What happened in the 1960s, 1950s, 1940s, 1930s... and even the 1910s? How many people, everyone made it with their own hands, step by step, who has no blood on their hands? Understanding things as emergencies can remove as many responsibilities as many people at once.

A perfect strategic understanding that avoids all conscientious responsibility.

When I was a child, I read an article and interviewed an old man from the previous dynasty. She said: Many people thought that starting in 1966, everyone suddenly fell into the boiling water pot, and cooking was painful. But who knew that from the very beginning, from the beginning of this pot, we started to burn wood, and we were already in pain when we were close to the bottom of the pot?

To this day, the principle is the same. If a person feels that he does not need to stand up to express and defend, it is because he is fortunate enough not to stick to the bottom of the pot. It is not morally necessary for him to express and defend absolutely, but his denial, ridicule, or just turning away from the expression and defense of those who are at the bottom of the pot is not only a moral act of evil, but also suffering for his own cooking. Add firewood. How can there be people in the world who are unwilling to save themselves and wish to harm themselves? This is not only where the conscience is, but where is the mind?

There is no need to fight just because you are still in a relatively privileged position for the time being. You don't need this level of struggle just because the privileged position you are temporarily in is "enough" high enough. But this pot of cooking water with firewood, can you escape?

In response to some women asking me recently "Why are they so intense, decisive, exaggerated, out of place?"

Not to mention that women are in the pot, aren't men not there? Are there any other genders?