Weekend Talk｜I watched Molière's comedy last night

It's been a long time since I wrote a weekend talk, and there are almost no weekends in these months.

My life has undergone unpredictable changes in the past two or three months, but I always know that real life is always more outrageous than drama. Reality is not a script written by playwrights with logical thinking, and it will not force chicken soup; It might be like a ridiculous comedy with dark humor, but it will never be to ridicule current affairs or smear others, because strange things always happen by surprise, and there is no time for rehearsal.

In mid-July, that was what actually happened to me, and I was in a passive role, impossible to plan in detail or to make everything logical, which then led to a series of horse grabs, and at first trying to express myself in a vague way The feeling of being offended does not want to cause trouble to anyone or confuse the public. It is very simple to vent in words, and then the plot is still unpredictable.

On the night of the incident, I first expressed that I would not explain my "mindset" that I wanted to express my emotions - I couldn't imagine that it would detonate if I posted it on purpose, but I wanted to be offended because of human nature. To express, there is no suppression of specific objects... At that time, I wrote a little arrogantly: "I only care about people who usually read my words, and I believe they can understand what I am expressing. As for other people who want to explore because of rumors and gossip The people of the matter are out of consideration.”

I am well aware that my values are the same (but I never consider myself to be virtuous and have never advertised it), unless I am not expressing it clearly to be misunderstood or misinterpreting it to add to the confusion. On the writing platform, you can only understand a person from the text, so I cherish those who can read the air between the words, and will not be sad because of misunderstandings by others. I believe that if they have the same reading habits and tastes, the values between each other will be very different. It is not easy to misunderstand each other when you are close. This belief in words is something I have always had. In the short story I wrote last year, I also mentioned the narrative of "people with the same reading habits should not misunderstand each other".

So, thinking back to what happened two months ago, there is no trace of script design, so I can't remember the sequence of events clearly, and I don't understand why such a deviated script was developed later. Just remembered that I said at the beginning that I don't need to explain too much, as long as my readers know it! At first glance, it sounds a bit arrogant, but in fact, it also expresses a small feeling about writing writing for a period of time last year: readers can read a person's values from words, and a keen person can read the truth and falsehood, and the author himself does not need to. Instruct the reader how to read.

I’m sorry, but this miscellaneous talk is still written at will. It should have something to do with Molière, but I don’t remember the reason why I just wrote it down here... I watched Molière’s comedy and its introduction last night, and I (I don’t know why) ) Thinking of Rousseau, who was born nearly a hundred years later, perhaps the delicate and sensitive French spirit? It is easy for them to feel other people's "dislikes", but I am a very direct person, and I am too lazy to express any metaphorical state in words, let alone satirize others with words.

People who often read my articles will probably find that if I want to express my negative thoughts about a phenomenon or person, I always write it directly, and I am not able to write too tactful words. I was born in a country where there is (should be) freedom of speech, There are no politicians and powerful people to please. This is probably the reason for developing "direct"?

Molière's career got off to a good start when he received the patronage of Louis XIV's brother Philip I and the nobles to direct plays at the Louvre (before the king), of which "The Hypocrite" is a satire of the Church and the Moralists But he was liked by the royal family and Parisians, and the king was so fond of him that he gave him a space suitable for rehearsal, and also allowed his troupe to enjoy the royal pension.

A good drama, such as Molière's comedy, requires that he write it to be natural and reasonable. He wants to satirize the object of his tacit understanding, and the other party will hate him so much. That kind of planned choreography arrangement is It takes time to ponder, but also has profound literary attainments. Isn’t it an ability that ordinary people can master.

Finally, there is a sense of humor. Gibran once said: "Not everyone can have a humorous attitude. It is a rare talent, and many people do not even have the ability to enjoy the happiness that people present to them." It is to take seriously the jokes I have said, and the acceptance of the sense of humor is the same as the values.

(Small thoughts handwritten, don't take it too seriously.)