EP17. 1+1=10, correct answer or wrong answer?

foreword

I mentioned earlier about my views on right and wrong. In the past, it was all black and white, but after that, I used various angles to evaluate and make a decision to see which direction is more correct. I actually thought about this issue. For a long time, I have been wanting to find a method or formula to apply all things to judge its results, and then draw some conclusions and the like. This episode will share this judgment in more depth, of course, this It's just my own personal opinion, so everyone is just a reference.

individual case

Filter subjectively and objectively before right or wrong

The first thing to define is the subjective and objective judgment mentioned above. When you are judging something, you can check to see if your sentence uses adjectives. If you use adjectives, you are subjective. On the contrary, you only state In the fact part, for example, this dress is beautiful and easy to wear. This is the use of adjectives, which means that this is a subjective judgment. Everyone’s subjective judgment is inherently different, not limited to aesthetics, because it is often I heard someone say that everyone's aesthetics are different, and then there is no right or wrong, but in fact I think that as long as it is subjective, there should be no so-called right or wrong, why? I will tell you later, then let's change it now The way to describe it, that is, the material of this dress is down, that's all, that's all, then this is an objective statement, because I'm talking about a fact, if you add some more, like it's warm , then this will become subjective again. As long as it is subjective, it is to judge whether it is good or bad. These are all comparisons. Why is down so warm? Is it because it is compared with another thing, compared with a windproof jacket Is it? Of course it will be very warm, but what if it is compared to goose down? It seems not necessarily, so I came to the conclusion from this place that "judging right or wrong first filter subjective views", it is an SOP.

Determine the bottom line for deciding right and wrong

Then you will know what is right and wrong. Why do you need to filter subjective and objective first? Because I think this is how you can evaluate whether the right or wrong is told to you by yourself or others, or whether it is really objective and bad, right For me, I think as long as what I believe in is right, just like religion. Do you want to say that belief in religion is right? Or is it wrong? Or which religion is right? Then which religion is wrong? ?Like this question, if it was when I was black and white in the past, I couldn't answer it, I could only say "this depends on the individual", but this answer is an answer that evades the answer, but it is a fact , so I come to a conclusion about your personal judgment of right and wrong, that is, as long as you believe and believe in it, then it is right, but at this time, I will feel that the scope of this sentence seems to be too large. I believe... For example, if it is right to kill, then I can kill, so under the premise of this, I need a restraint. I myself think "You don't want to affect other people, and don't talk to the majority." If someone touches the law, then it’s OK.” To put it bluntly, it’s the law. As long as you don’t touch the law, you can basically do anything. For example, if I want to swim at the beach today, it doesn’t matter how long it takes to swim. It’s ok, but I took a tour, and the tour was too far, and it turned into saying that I smuggled the law, and it’s not OK to violate the law, but the law is basically made by people, so it is made by many people subjectively. Well, that’s why it needs to be optimized all the time. It’s not an absolutely correct rule, but it’s the bottom line for everyone to restrict, so everyone agrees, so it becomes a rule for everyone, that’s why I say” Don't affect other people, but also can't get in touch with the majority of people." In short, it's a matter of accusation. If the law itself is wrong, but the law is set like this, so you can only follow it. At most, it’s just a matter of slowly cultivating the Fa, so that everyone can understand this point of view? It’s just that I don’t always feel that people tell me right or wrong is right or wrong. I hope that my right and wrong should be thought from the bottom of my heart, and then I understand it before going. Accept it, I think it will be better to convince yourself this way, otherwise you will get used to receiving information blindly, and then you will slowly refuse to think. How can you maintain independent thinking and judgment? Especially if you are a A leader or a decision maker, isn't that the same as taking everyone to death?

The Unfounded Right and Wrong of Modern Education

This is also related to the things I mentioned about education in the previous episodes, that is, everyone has been told you right or wrong by other people madly since childhood, but few people discuss why, so many people can't think independently. I haven't even thought about "why think about why?", excluding the conflict that I said before, if I really love to play, why do I have to...have to follow everyone to memorize the text over there? The meaning of education is not that it should be Let you try many ways, and then choose what you love to play? How can you perform very well in every project? If you are strong in everything, doesn't it mean that you have no strength? And the most tragic thing is that you don't have any strengths at all. I don’t know if there are any of these things that you are very strong in. I don’t know if it’s because I don’t see much, or when I was studying in the past, those students who got good grades and performed very well in various subjects, now Many of them are very painful to be a salesman there, sell insurance, etc., and then don’t like to read, and play guitar all day long. Now they open a studio and work as a teacher to create their own brand. Don’t get me wrong, I mean, I hope everyone can reflect on it. When you are telling others that you are right or wrong, what is the basis for the answer you give? Then do you think there is any answer to this question? Question? Are you responsible for the answer? If you don't know how you got your answer, why would you pass it on to the next person?

you decide is right

Then another part I want to add is the point of "there is no way to go in vain". I forget whether I have mentioned it before, but it can be added here, that is, when you judge your right or wrong, it will not affect other people. After people and most people, you decide to do this, then it is right, even if there is no result in the end, at least you have experience. In terms of programming, I think it is very appropriate, that is, I used to be tricked several times. Baigong, I wrote a bunch of programs, and then I didn't have pay, but there are many similar cases in the back, I can directly use the previous things to change, and the whole change is super fast, and then I also watched a video, I Forget who it is, it seems to be an interview film, it just asks, what should I do? It seems to be about going abroad for development, and then the person in the film said, "If you now assess that going abroad can have If there is a good opportunity for development, then... that is what you want, then you go abroad, and if you decide not to go abroad in the end, it is also right, maybe you will encounter an air crash when you go abroad." But he did not say It's so extreme, I just think he said it very well, and then shorten it and strengthen it a little bit, that is, if you make a decision that you believe in, how can you regret it? Do you really want to do it all over again? Will you choose another option? Then your life will be all over again. Do you still need to come to such a life? The whole is super boring. The conclusion I came to is probably a meaning, no one knows. The real right or wrong, as long as you believe in yourself, you believe in yourself, and then don't affect other people or groups, then basically "the key to the right or wrong decision you make is up to you".

practice experience

This is different from the previous two-point thinking and the golden circle. Those two ways of thinking are to help you focus and plan, but before planning, you have to decide where to go. The thinking in this episode is a bit more advanced. , when you are planning the next step, try not to define right or wrong. Right and wrong can be changed due to different angles. You can use a more positive way to evaluate this matter, that is, use the "this choice is better" this Make a decision with your mentality, don’t define it as right or wrong, because you may think it is wrong from this point of view and in this link, but you will find out later that it is actually right from a macro perspective. It has been defined as wrong, then in the decision-making process later, if you have defined it as wrong at this time, then it will no longer be an option in your entire decision-making process, then it will be a pity, this is My own opinion, I don't know what other people think about this.

Original link Independent sample creation process