"M" Matt City - Feature Suggestion: Tracking and Tag Usage

Dear @Matty-ies Two things, short first. Can the tracking function be divided into works and comments like the personal homepage? In this way, people who want to follow articles can easily find them, and it is also convenient for people who want to follow topics to chat and discuss.

The long thing is that I found concepts that can be related when I read other people's articles. Although the themes and types of the two articles are different, I just want to explain why I related the two articles. To understand whether this related article also has topics or thoughts that they are interested in, you can click on it.

Examples: [Old World Story] The Last Amazon, The Eternal Amazon and "Push" A bloody, friendly, beautiful film with a certain sense of humor.

Both articles mentioned a feeling of living in the middle and the present moment, one said that it was awe-inspiring, and the other said that it was worthy of awe, and would not kill life. The associated label for "feeling/concept development" is "sacred". If others have similar experiences and feelings, they may add to this concept, and it must be an asset for us to write together.

At present, I can only link the later text to the previous text. The reason for the connection is also left in the comments of the previous text. The author of the previous text may see it, but others will not know if he wants to link the later text. However, if the display of the related work has a label, Or the display of related works can be more helpful if you can see the description first.

Then this matter may be extended to pure readers who are completely third parties. The readers find that the articles of the two authors have related concepts/feelings/thinking, etc. Is it possible to make an inductive label? The first layer is not only to make classification to facilitate retrieval, but the second layer will actually be the exchange of readers' experience. Later people found that the previous people made an interesting connection because of their original opinions. The following plot may be very diverse, but only after continuing, can they figure out what the function of this third party needs to be written. degree.

For example, the label of the work was selected by the author himself, and later a "hobby label" was selected by many hobby Matt citizens: "Matt's love by a certain number of citizens", but another group of people thought that it should be more consistent with other people. The theme of the event is sometimes related, so a new "controversy label" was born: "The Rebellion of OO Beginning by Citizen on Date"... This is all reserved for someone to organize an archaeological exploration team to visit the old Matt in the future. The birth and evolution of the city and a piece of work.

Above, I hope that my needs are clearly expressed, and the idea of extension may also be interesting to everyone (the new gameplay in Matt City, it seems that many citizens are mainly reading). Shrimp (Taiwanese: "Sweet Shrimp / Shrimp" = Thank you!).

The following are my observations on the use of community tags and my thoughts on how to use them. It is not complete. The only thing related to the present is whether to display all tags, because for me and some practicality, the author used What label, whether to follow it is the first consideration, so it is important to display it completely for everyone to see.

－－

I forgot where I asked Matty last time if the Simplified Chinese Traditional Chinese of the same tag will be integrated into the same one, and then I sorted out my thinking about the use of tags. The following is for reference: I am also in the process of tagging. Two types of thinking about tagging were found, one more like the keywords used when looking for library materials, and the other was to pick or add a related subject category.

For example, my article talks about the relationship between the United States and the United Nations in the last century. In terms of categories, you may simply select "United States", "Politics", "United Nations" and "History" and then create a "back garden".

In terms of the volume and topic of the articles in front of me, it's not bad. If the volume is large, it will require more specific and smaller topics to be retrieved. If the tags cannot be added in the future, I am not sure how troublesome it will be.

After the recent revision, I can’t see all the tags (I can still see it when I posted last time), why there seems to be a need for this, because in the previous version, at the end of the article, all the tags felt like the emphasis was strengthened In order to read, or feel the same, I will also want to write an article that uses the same tag.