just support sexual minorities

野人
·
·
IPFS
·
Then, by the way, make a politically correct sexual minority organization~

1

I accidentally found a message from a homophobic demon somewhere else (what?! It’s almost 2023?!), it’s great, I’m also afraid of the illogical demon, so I suggest that the illogical homophobic follow the same logical principle to die~

What needs to be explained first is that the homophobic "devils" I am talking about are not those who simply hate homosexuality, but those who still think that homosexuality is a disease in this era, and want to eliminate homosexuality like a disease and deny their existence. Logically deficient patients. It's normal not to like it, and it's also normal not to understand it, but because you don't like it, you think it's a disease. Usually, the behavior of thinking with this narcissistic logic is the real disease.

These demons "understand righteousness" and the high-sounding "big principles" are nothing more than:

a) Physiological identity:
It is "normal" to think that since others have a penis, they must think of themselves as men, and if they have a vagina, they must think of themselves as women. Unswervingly abide by the dogma of "substance determines consciousness" in disabled Marxism (Oh, I'm really sorry for accidentally exposing the spiritual belonging of these patients ( ̄y▽, ̄)╭ ).
If the material form has the ability to "determine" the connotation, should you consider posting photos for us to judge you, instead of writing words for others to see? Ah, the outside decides the inside~
Such people generally think that the universal standards they recognize should be applied to all people, and they don't know that the so-called "universal" is not, and almost never equal to "all". The so-called universality is also an attribute that human cognition extracts from the observation of the nature of things. If such extracted attributes are used to define individuals without such universality, it is undoubtedly a logical inversion.

b) Reproductive supremacy:
It is believed that homosexuals cannot have children. Once the identification of homosexuality is opened, it will lead to population reduction and eventually the extinction of human beings.
So homosexuality is contagious? I am also more worried that speech without logic will cause infection. Should this kind of person consider soaking the whole body in aqua regia to disinfect?
Seeing the increase of individual cases (single), immediately infer that it will inevitably continue to increase until there is no upper limit, but it is not known that the change of "increase" is usually controlled by conditions. It should also be a logical implication error: for example, the inference that C can only be derived from A and B, this kind of person immediately believes that C must appear when they see A. As for whether there is B, he doesn't care. It is generally a habit formed by using simple logic for many years. For example, if it is either A or B, or if A then B, adding an additional judgment condition may be too complicated for them.

c) Of course, it does not rule out the shadow of the crime of homosexual violence. Basically, it is an inference of irrelevant nature: it is to forcibly link the two characteristics of "crime" and "homosexuality", and directly deduce the most general nature or consequence ∀ from the individual existence ∃ without any additional conditions.
This part of people can also understand it, and it may be better to see a psychiatrist to get rid of this wrong logic.

At this point, I really believe that the devil who only understands a single judgment or a dichotomous judgment will want to say: Ah, you support homosexuality in this way, are you saying that homosexuality is absolutely "correct"?
come and see my expression

:)

I don't understand the rationality of existence, do you? ~_~

2

In contrast, there are also extremes in the group that supports homosexuality. Some players were boycotting Warner's "Hogwarts What" game (I forgot the full name and I'm too lazy to find it~_~). This game has almost nothing to do with Rowling, but because Rowling complained about not using women well and using people who menstruate menstruating people instead of this kind of speech to resist everything that seems to be about her. The cheap thing about this kind of political correctness is that they want to impose their own perceptions on others and tell others: You must recognize me as I recognize myself in order to respect me.
This is obviously because these politically correct people regard their own cognition as the yardstick for measuring everything. Translated into vernacular: they take themselves too seriously.
In other words, you can think that you are the center of the world, or that your cognition is the ultimate truth of the universe, but you cannot force others to think so. It's as if I'm writing an article, not telling you that I am "right" and everything that doesn't fit me is "wrong", but telling you "what I think is right". You can also come and tell me what you think is right (although I don’t care), but if you tell me with your extremely limited cognition that anything that doesn’t match your cognition is wrong, I will Intuitive suspicion: Are you sick?

Originally, I wanted to talk about whether I should hurt these illogical monsters in the way of gay Wilde, but think about it or forget it. They can’t even accept the cognition that others have nothing to do with them. Heart and cerebrovascular, I did not commit crimes~_~

It's better to type in the way of gay Alan Dulin, so that at least you won't die suddenly in a public place, otherwise it will be a waste of medical resources.


postscript

Thinking of my previous article on the misuse of logical implication, I originally wanted to absurd the thinking mode of people who think illogically, but then I thought that people who can understand just understand a form of explanation, and do not get it in essence. New things; and those who have no logic in themselves have no basic ability to correctly understand that kind of article, let alone practice. In this sense, logical articles like this should also be considered rubbish. Useless crap in every sense (not even entertaining). (After all, the whole waste article tag is already in my pocket, hehehehe~)

Waste text is awesome ( ̄y▽, ̄)╭

CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

廢文,請勿支持~

logbook icon
野人學中世紀哲學,暫時還沒死的怪咖野人。正在學習如何假裝人類。 ⋯⋯ 喔幹,學不會。
  • Author
  • More

聊玩

聊吃

偽經驗|當書店的書架上沒有你喜歡的書時