Regulations, restrictions, orders about those platforms?

One thing first.

Recently, an article on "Withdrawing the CFO" written in PM was officially retracted. Fortunately, I have a backup copy here, which can be seen from the related article later.

Why was it blocked? The answer is "article classification"! 🤣

In the early days, PM encouraged posting and inviting comrades in arms (offline). I interpreted it as the need for new media to gain momentum. At the same time, many Internet celebrity writers were invited to join the writing ranks. There were indeed many rewards in the early stage. The prize was CFO tokens. Taiwan dollar (now has more than doubled), many people flocked to mining at the beginning, and they gained a lot. According to my observation, highly popular authors should have hundreds of thousands of coins. This is the benefit of traffic. . But what do PMs earn? Earn advertising click revenue and publication revenue. This kind of commercial dividend profit is actually quite good. Later, some smart users even exploited loopholes to earn points, which led to the decision to be a problem platform and the decline in advertising revenue. Therefore, the official began to tighten certain policies and regulations. As long as they are found to violate the rules, their accounts will be locked and suspended. right.

After a few months of observation, PM has indeed made the platform a little fresher through its powerful reporting mechanism and "high-speed" withdrawal methods. Since then, the website has been continuously updated and expanded, and more regulations, restrictions, and even more restrictions have been added. "Order" is not an exaggeration.

Because I even manage the "category" of articles 🤔

In contrast, the writing platforms such as Ruffian, Pathfinder, Matt City, and Fangzi that have been added in the past four seasons, only the emerging platforms such as Matt City and Fangzi do not have the option of "category", but use publishing and tags as categories. So it's actually pretty good for the writers to decide on their own categorization. However, Matt citizens really hope to have this "category option" for readers to find.

However, due to different atmospheres, after a few months, my feeling is: in PM is like "walking on the tightrope set by the official to write"; on the other hand, in Matt City, it is like "a platform willing to openly discuss and share good writing " .

Is this the so-called "decentralization?"

This is really the first time in the four seasons that it has been removed from the shelves due to "article classification". You are right, that is, it is removed from the shelves, and it cannot be revised and put on the shelves again. Only by deleting it, the punishment is very strong!

Although I think the whole story of the whole incident is a bit interesting, I personally still "disapprove" the official approach. At least, I will still classify my articles, passers-by don't like it and want to report it, so let's talk!

🫥 Let's talk about the recent currency value and writing value

Yesterday, because the validator I was concerned about was disconnected, the interest income was stagnant, so I took all the interest and cleared all the LikeCoins or transferred the delegation from the disconnected validator, and returned to 0, and the interest earned after noon The funds and distributions are my income today.

Leaving aside the price of the coin (it would have been up and down in the first place) Four Seasons has been in Matt City for 500 days, whether it is LikeCoin or the number of positive readers it has received, in fact, it is far more echoed than any platform!

In terms of the freedom of articles, the depth and breadth of writing, Matt City's achievements and members are not inferior to other platforms, and even more "in-depth" discussions under the original text are more popular, which is not found on other platforms. I like it here, and I hope more writers will maintain it in the future to create a beautiful writing environment and enjoy the life of writing .