洛書
洛書

台灣居住政策研究;社會住宅推動聯盟研究員。 這邊都是有關居住正義的硬核文章,偶爾有幾篇沒那麼硬的。 贊助連結:https://liker.land/limitroy/civic FB:https://www.facebook.com/limitroy/

Ah Di was exposed to endorse the B-type industrial house. What is the problem with the B-type industrial house?

First of all, due to the difference in policy risk, plot ratio and building coverage rate, industrial houses are usually sold relatively cheaply to attract the public. But at the same time, its loan limit and holding tax rate will be higher than that of ordinary houses. In addition, if the owner of the house is found to have residential use, he will also be fined, unless you really intend to do a studio or other residence. use, otherwise it is highly not recommended to buy.

The construction project of "Changqunxiangxiang" endorsed by Adi was revealed to be a Type B industrial house. What exactly is a Type B industrial house? What's wrong with B-type industrial houses? I don't play anything fake, I directly found the license that Changqun enjoys, and I will talk to you about this a little bit.

【What is an industrial house? 】

Industrial land cannot be used to build residential buildings, and its floor area ratio and build-to-shade ratio are different from those of general residential land. Industrial houses, as the name suggests, are houses built in industrial areas in violation of the Urban Planning Act.

Type B industrial zones are used for factories or industrial facilities with mild pollution, including "editing and recording studios" and "corporate operations headquarters", so compared to other industrial zones, there is more room to be converted into residences. In the past, "general commercial facilities" could also be placed in Type B industrial areas, but they were later deleted because there were too many industrial houses.

[What happened to the case of Changqun Xiangxiang? 】

Changqunxiangxiang is a standard B-class industrial house. In fact, this construction project was also submitted with "general commercial facilities" during the construction license period. Later, due to the above deletion, the license was finally changed to "industrial product display service". industry".

The legal advisers of the builders will never let them expose loopholes for the government to catch. After the people buy it and use it as a house, they will be fined, which is the personal behavior of the people. This is also the reason why the photos of this case are not put on the bed, and the picture endorsed by Adi also has to write "the destination of this case: B-type industrial zone", that is, the builder has to prove that he has fulfilled his obligation to inform.

【What's wrong with industrial houses? 】

First of all, industrial houses are usually sold at a lower price to attract the public because of the different policy risks, floor area ratio and building coverage rate.

But at the same time, its loan limit and holding tax rate will be higher than that of ordinary houses. In addition, if the owner of the house is found to have residential use, he will also be fined, unless you really plan to do a studio or other residence. use, otherwise it is highly not recommended to buy.

[Why is it difficult to understand the industrial house? How to deal with it? 】

So why are industrial houses repeatedly banned? Because the builders have already dismissed their responsibilities, they won't say that this is a "residential house", so they can't help but let the builders build their studios.

As for the residents, most of them know that industrial houses have these problems (because the loan application, tax rate, and architectural design are different), but they are buying with a fluke mentality. What they hope most is that after a large group of people have violated the law, they demand that the urban plan be changed, and then pay a small fee to be legal on the spot.

Therefore, to curb industrial housing, one possible direction is to make such products more inconvenient and difficult to use when turned into housing, making this thing gradually unprofitable. You can refer to the Taipei City release in 2020, "The use of residential areas in Taipei City's industrial areas violates Article 79, Paragraph 1 of the Urban Planning Law." .

Because if the household registration is to be established in the industrial zone, the fact of residence is required, and the civil affairs unit will first advise the public and the industrial zone not to be used for residential use; Once a building in an industrial area is seized for residential use, fines will be imposed.

We have also discussed this case with the New Taipei City Urban and Rural Bureau, and it is currently being processed. If there is an update, we will tell you.

--

To support us please donate to OURs Urban Reform

https://lihi1.cc/tlPjY

CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Like my work?
Don't forget to support or like, so I know you are with me..

was the first to support this article
Loading...

Comment