陶樂思
陶樂思

社工系學士。現職行政人員。業餘寫作。喜愛自學。寫作領域涵蓋觀點、社會科學、歷史知識、寓言短篇等。Github: https://github.com/Dorothy1984

I have to accept a cruel reality: it turns out that Tao Lesi is not the author, but the reader

Today, as a reader, I have something to say to you, who are also readers. I'm not qualified to teach anyone how to be a good reader, I just want to share my own practice, which can be used for reference, and those who have different ideas are welcome to express.

Although I said before that I would take a long break until the chaos on the page disappears, but in fact there is still an activity to be completed, so in fact, I haven't left here for the past two days, just haven't updated the article. But when it comes to rest, there is indeed a rest. In addition to not updating, the clapping is limited to the works that I really like very much, and I like the works that I immediately support with my pockets, and the human clapping has stopped. It turned out to be really light and comfortable! Light and comfortable to a point, I decided to stay in this way in the future. Because of this, I also took advantage of the non-updated time in the past two days to clean up my tracking list, in order to simplify my tracking list as much as possible when there is so much information in the new page. The cleanup this time is mainly to withdraw some life writers and social writers. This announcement is actually meant to remind those authors who have followed each other with me to check the list of followers and withdraw me if necessary.

What does the above paragraph have to do with the title of my article? Let me explain slowly. Why don't I use some questions to clarify my thoughts!

Question 1: You seem to be completely out of touch here, are you not afraid of not being able to survive? Okay, let's talk about it in two ways. If my identity is the author, I am eager for my works to be truly liked by readers. How can it be allowed to mix human feelings to make a fake result? Especially someone like me who has been a result-oriented person since I was a child. I value real grades. Giving me beautiful fake grades is not as good as killing me. But as the title of the article says, I found myself unworthy of the title of creator at all. Like me, I can't write novels, poems, and screenplays... What else is a creator? I love to read, and there are so many words in my heart that I have to write them out. Therefore, the extremely large amount is just a reader with a lot of words. As a wordy reader, I just want someone who is willing to listen, understand and treat with heart. So those who want to win back the pat, clap their hands without even looking, or want to reciprocate because I patted him/her, sorry these are not what I want at all.

Question 2: Why do you specifically say that you should quit life writers and social writers? Do you hate or despise them? I don't know almost anyone here, so what's the material that arouses my hatred or contempt? It's just that as a reader, I take full responsibility for my own reading needs. With my current experience and state of mind, the works of life writers and social writers cannot meet my spiritual nutritional needs. What I need are works with high intellectual content, high content of knowledge and significance of the times. Only this kind of work can satisfy my personal aspirations and spiritual development needs. I have to be a responsible reader for myself, so through screening, I remove those that are not suitable for me and leave those that are suitable for me. This is a necessary process.

Well, after pretending to answer two questions, now I would like to throw a few questions to you, you as readers, as readers: As readers, do you want to read high-quality works (although the definition of high-quality can have thousands of species)? Do you think that as a reader, do you have a role and responsibility for creating the shape and number of ecology? In my mind, the answers to the above questions are all yes. If readers have roles and responsibilities for the entire creative ecology, then human clapping and social clapping, these things that have nothing to do with the quality of the work, are involved in the evaluation of the work, and especially affect the distribution of income. It really has no negative effect on the entire creative ecology. Affect?

I remember that in May of this year, @shooter Mommy Tingting wrote an article calling for the quality of the article to not deteriorate, so it is better to start with prudent clapping. To this day, I really have mixed tastes. At that time, many people thought a lot, saying that she wanted to censor other people's clap; they said that she did not censor the writers who wrote nonsense, but the readers who clap. He even made waves because he was jealous of the number of other people clapping their hands. And as a reader, I have also read the article of the shooter mummy, and I don't feel that I am restricted to clap freely. As a reader, do you really have no responsibility for the creative ecology at all? Readers' comments reflect market demand. If the articles in the running account, counting the white baskets from morning to night, explaining what you have eaten, what you have drank, when you poop, when you urinate, and when you fart are appreciated and supported by readers, the market will be full of such articles. As a reader, Tao Lesi absolutely does not want such a day. So I don't like this kind of work, and I don't even bother to waste time watching it. If, for various reasons, whether it is human or self-interest, I participate in praising articles like this, and as a result, such articles flood the market, I have absolutely no right to stand in the position of the victim and say that I have no responsibility. Of course, everyone has the freedom to support the work they like. Here are just a few questions. I hope that readers with a serious attitude will think more, and I hope that more readers will be more conscious of their roles and responsibilities.

Conclusion: After the break, my mind is clearer, and my determination to be a good reader is more determined. The layout of Matt City is still very chaotic, but this has made me think of ways to better take care of my reading needs. I'll pick ten or less authors here, bookmark their homepages, read them all in one spot, and support them like crazy. This approach not only helps me solve the problem of fragmented reading, but also reduces a lot of distractions. I hope this way of reading will bring me significant improvement. When there is a chance in the future, I will introduce to you the authors who have been bookmarked by me.


CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Like my work?
Don't forget to support or like, so I know you are with me..

Loading...

Comment