Long Wenshen: Tell me why I published the article the day before yesterday, and tell me how I feel about the incident and the whole community

Since I received some feedback after publishing this article yesterday, I decided to revise and repost it. It is a pity that I have never successfully implemented the function of modifying the article in Matt City. Every time I change a word or a whole sentence, I press "Save Modification" and return to the article, it is always intact. So I had to hide the article and publish a revised new version. Those who have clapped do not need to clap again.

----------------------------

My "Building Matt City Art Gallery" campaign started eight days ago, and I have already received 11 works. Every piece of work makes me happy these days. Let's use my activities as the actual situation that provokes thinking. My campaign stipulates that each entrant can only submit one entry. If you submit more than one piece of work, the one with the most clapping will be used for scoring. Just imagine, if one of the contestants opened two trumpets and submitted three works as three people, then his/her three works will be regarded as one submitted by one person without being screened. To make matters worse, I love the bonus calculation so much that all participants will receive bonuses regardless of their rank. In this way, the person who submits three articles on the trumpet account will get three bonuses, the only question is how much. Of course, you can say that they also produced three works and paid for it! But if you want to go deeper, will those who do not open a trumpet make the same effort to submit three works, will they have the same reward?

The day before yesterday, I published an article "I may have been deceived, deceived by money, deceived votes and deceived feelings". Some users are desperately leaving messages under my articles, and in addition to quarreling with other users, they also accuse me of chasing shadows, judging others, and posting only for gossip and watching dramas. So I really want to talk about the reason for posting that article the day before yesterday, and what happened before.

I leave messages and post on the Internet, and I have always been afraid of "speculating cars", so I will not talk nonsense if I don't have enough information to convince me. As I said before, I did sincerely believe that it was children who committed plagiarism unintentionally. But after reading @Cherryyoko Cherry Yoko's article " When will the crime rate in Matt City drop ", I saw another version that is more naive. Of course, I said that I am a person who is afraid of speculating on cars, so I will not only read the cherry-picked words. In addition to reading the doubts raised by the article and the evidence presented, I also carefully read the comments below to see what users have said. No other opinions and views. I admit that although the article I published the day before yesterday did not insist that it was a trumpet incident, I do tend to believe it was a trumpet incident. According to the information I have obtained, I can briefly summarize the following three points. If I have any misunderstandings, please welcome Cherries and @宮頭MMTingting to correct them:

One, Sanming users, including teachers and students in the event, were found to have plagiarized while participating in an event. The style of plagiarism, as well as the fallacy of problem solving for activity requirements, are strikingly similar. To use a more life-like analogy, several students copy the same homework, and the results are right together and wrong together.

Second, teachers and students seem to stick together almost 24 hours a day. Students even left a message at 7:00 a.m. claiming that they were at the teacher's house, promising to delete the article immediately. The teacher's two apologies often give a general impression that the teacher and the student seem to be together all the time.

Of course, there are other explanations for the above two points: the similarity of the articles may be a coincidence; it is also possible that the teacher and the students are very close and often together. But the problem is the third point.

Third, as mentioned above, there are three highly similar plagiarized articles from teachers, students and another user. It just so happened that the teacher had a conversation with another user in the incident, and it was discovered that the account and person were set up by Zhang Guanli. This is the most critical factor for the trumpet to be captured. The previous handsome trumpet incident also relied on this evidence to solve the case. At the time, the handsome guy responded with an excuse that he was framed by hackers. so funny! Hackers don't have time to extort more money from several large American companies, and waste time to engage in a little-known Internet author?

After talking about the reasons for my post, tell me how I feel about this community. Honestly, I'm very disappointed, and I feel really powerless for these nasty things to keep happening. My disappointment is both for Matt city officials and for the bad ethos of the community as a whole. It has been two days since the incident, but the officials of Matt City have not said a word. As early as last year's handsome guy incident, in fact, I can't see what the official has done. At least it is invisible at the level of announcements. Maybe I can't see the official work! As for this community, I have begun to doubt whether it can be called a community again. Matt's injustice is not the only one or two, but most people here only care about their clapping hands and wallets. What does it matter to me how unjust my circumstances have become? Indeed, in a social environment, you need to clap a lot, so that you can earn more coins by clapping your hands. Of course, it is best to be kind to others and not to offend others. So most people choose to turn a blind eye to the dirty things that happen together again and again, and it's just right to smoke positive energy opium every day.

Yesterday, I saw an author who stated that she was disgusted by the trumpet incidents here and there, plus personal considerations and other problems in Matt City, the result was that she decided to complete the activities at hand and say goodbye. This is a very knowledgeable and experienced author. I am deeply saddened by her decision to leave. Although the trumpet incident was not the sole reason for her decision to leave. But trumpets, likes, and coins affect the community atmosphere. Shouldn’t they really be responsible for driving away high-quality authors? Do I want to leave too? Not yet. I'm not a good writer in the first place. I'm here for a dual-track experiential learning of hands-on reading and writing. There are so many amazing people here that I watch and learn from. This event also made me meet more people who are worth making friends. In addition to the above-mentioned Miss Cherry and the shooter Mummy, there is also the one who spoke for me this time @huitingman. Therefore, I still want to work hard here, try my best to promote change, and improve the reading atmosphere. Of course, if this is an outright place of reverse elimination, so that all the high-quality authors have left, then I will not have the slightest nostalgia. Wonder if this day will come?