【推文】James Lindsay - Stakeholder capitalism is literally a rebrand of the Worker's Soviets

這是 James Lindsay 最近寫的不算很長的推文串

連結

• 原推文 - x.com/conceptualjame...

• Thread Reader App版本（一頁版本） - threadreaderapp.com/...

原文及個人翻譯

In the 1920s, the Soviet Union pandered to its "native" (koreni) ethnic minorities that had been swept up under Russian and then Soviet rule with a program called korenizatsiya (nativification or "rootsification") in exactly this way to turn them against their class enemies.

在1920年代，蘇聯以一種名為「本土化政策 / 去俄羅斯化」（korenizatsiya）的計劃，完全以這種方式迎合其「本土」（koreni）的少數民族，這些民族在俄羅斯和隨後的蘇聯統治下被捲入，以使他們反對階級敵人。

I know I've really been harping on korenizatsiya lately and that it's a very foreign concept, but it's extremely important for us to understand. It's the fundamental basis for the DEI programs we've been running, and it's also the exact mechanism of the "native" Woke programming.

I think it's generally very important for us to understand when we're running a direct Soviet Communist import program and for people to learn to recognize a direct Soviet Communist import program, so I'm talking a lot about it. It's not just "Leftist insanity" or empathy.

我知道我最近一直強調「本土化政策」，這是一個很陌生的概念，但對我們來說理解它是極其重要的。它是我們一直在執行的DEI計劃的基本基礎，也是「本土」覺醒（Woke）程式運作的精確機制。

我認為，理解我們正在執行的直接來自蘇聯共產主義的進口計劃，以及讓人們學會識別這種直接來自蘇聯共產主義的進口計劃，是極其重要的。這不僅僅是「左傾瘋狂」或同理心的問題。

Land acknowledgements are a direct ideological descendent of Soviet korenizatsiya, as are many of the other features of both DEI and Leftist incursion into reservations and with native populations, esp. in Alaska, Hawaii, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, etc. It's a tactic.

The way the imported Muslim populations are being treated and handled in Europe, the UK, and Canada (eventually further) are also a form of the korenizatsiya playbook being run by modern Communists in a novel way: import the "natives" with a flipped script.

The same is true for illegal alien "migrants" in the US, Canada, etc. It is also a form of the korenizatsiya playbook being run by modern Communists in a novel way: import the "natives" with a flipped script, same, same.

土地承認是蘇聯「本土化政策」的直接意識形態後裔，正如DEI和左翼勢力入侵保留地及與原住民接觸的許多其他特徵一樣，特別是在阿拉斯加、夏威夷、加拿大、澳大利亞、紐西蘭等地區。這是一種戰術。

歐洲、英國和加拿大（最終可能進一步擴散）對待和處理輸入的穆斯林人口的方式，也是現代共產主義者以一種新穎的方式運行「本土化政策」手冊的一種形式：以翻轉的劇本輸入「本土」人口。

美國、加拿大等地的非法外來「移民」也是如此。這也是現代共產主義者以一種新穎的方式運行「本土化政策」手冊的一種形式：以翻轉的劇本輸入「本土」人口，如出一轍。

Korenizatsiya (DEI + Indigeneity, cf. Affirmative Action) doesn't work. In the Soviet Union by the end of the 1920s, it became a serious source of ethnic strife. The people implementing it KNOW it doesn't work except to consolidate power and cause problems with Soviet solutions.

Korenizatsiya ran alongside the USSR's "New Economic Policy (NEP)" through the 1920s and eventually became a serious impediment to the implementation of its later initiatives and agendas by the early 1930s, so it was discarded violently, as in the Holodomor in Ukraine.

「本土化政策」（DEI + 原住民身份，參照平權行動）行不通。到1920年代末，在蘇聯，它成為民族衝突的嚴重來源。實施這一政策的人知道，它除了鞏固權力和製造需要蘇聯解決的問題外，別無他用。

「本土化政策」與蘇聯的「新經濟政策（NEP）」並行於1920年代，最終在20世紀30年代初成為實施其後來的倡議和議程的嚴重障礙，因此，它以暴力方式被拋棄，正如烏克蘭的霍洛多莫爾大饑荒所示。

We see a similar phenomenon now. Larry Fink (BlackRock) and all the other globalist players all talk about "transition investing," "sustainability," and "inclusive capitalism" with a "stakeholder capitalism" model. These are all just rebrands of old Communist schemes.

Transition investing and "sustainability" are effectively our New Economic Policy, and Western korenizatsiya (DEI) has been a central feature of it. Now it's a liability, so they're jettisoning it to advance the NEP. ESG and sustainability continue while dropping DEI.

Stakeholder capitalism is literally a rebrand of the Worker's Soviets, which had Affirmative Action korenizatsiya representation (inclusion) shot right through them. Instead of workers' Soviets, we now have experts' Soviets, i.e., "stakeholders." It's a new Sovietism.

I'd be quaint and say "history is rhyming," but that's BS. The same bad players are trotting out the same bad playbook to create the same bad results, just with new faces and a new facade. We are heading for a bad time if we don't comprehend these moves and fight back smartly.

我們現在看到類似的現象。Larry Fink（黑石集團 / BlackRock）和所有其他全球主義玩家都談論「轉型投資 / transition investing」、「可持續發展 / sustainability」和「包容性資本主義 / inclusive capitalism」，並採用「利益相關者資本主義 / stakeholder capitalism」的模型。這些只是舊共產主義計劃的重新包裝。

轉型投資和「可持續發展」實際上就是我們的「新經濟政策（NEP）」，而西方的「本土化政策」（DEI）一直是其中的重要特徵。現在它成為負擔，所以他們將其拋棄以推進新經濟政策。在放棄DEI的同時，ESG和可持續發展繼續進行。

「利益相關者資本主義 / stakeholder capitalism」實際上是工人蘇維埃（Worker's Soviets）的重新包裝，後者具有平權行動「本土化政策」的代表（包容）。現今的不叫工人蘇維埃，我們現在有專家蘇維埃，即「利益相關者」。這是一種新蘇維埃主義。

我可能會說「歷史在押韻」，但這都是胡說八道。同樣的壞人正在拿出同樣的壞手冊，創造同樣的壞結果，只是換了新的面孔和新的外殼。如果我們不理解這些舉動並聰明地反擊，我們將面臨艱難時期。