leafwind
leafwind

在日軟體工程師|不務正業|碎念個人意見|聯絡我:https://linktr.ee/leafwind

LikeCoin 參數調整議案 #64

(编辑过)
簡單描述此議案會帶來什麼改變?以及為什麼這個議案重要?
(Traditional Chinese version comes after English version)
(中文版本在英文版本後面)

This is a parameter change proposal to increase fee for both x/iscn and x/likenft module.

Please go to https://dao.like.co/proposals/64 to vote.

What does this change mean?

For creators

If you only want to register ISCN: update ISCN will spend 10x more, but it will be still neglect-able (0.018 LIKE for average fee setting)

If you want to go further create your Writing NFT: creating NFT class and minting NFT will spend 2x more, but it will be still neglect-able (0.0034 LIKE and 2.8 LIKE respectively for average fee setting)

For NFT collectors

Collectors will use "Grant" module to buy NFT, so there will be no change. (0.002 LIKE for average fee setting)

For community

Those modules' fee will be collected by chain (like gas), so it will goes to validator and community pool, which makes the ecosystem more robust and healthy.

Why this is important to the community?

ISCN and Writing NFT are real products, which is quite valuable and commendable among web3 world, however, the real products always have cost, so it is essential to keep the economy sustainable.

The current fee is almost zero, and it's better to adjust it to reflect the chain cost gradually, also, a reasonable fee structure can also help improving the demand side of $LIKE tokenomics, which is critical to our ecosystem.

As a participant, we should be aware to keep LikeCoin from becoming a public tragedy. This proposal is quite a small change, thus it should not stop the growth of our product.

As a validator, I'd like to take this chance to kickoff the awareness to review the fee consistently, and it is just a start for the community to judge if this is a good direction or not.


(中文版本)

這是一個參數調整提案,目的是要提昇 x/iscn 及 x/likenft 模組的費用。

請到 https://dao.like.co/proposals/64 投票。

這代表什麼改變?

對創作者來說

如果只是要註冊 ISCN,任何對 ISCN 的更新費用都會變成 10 倍,但小到可以忽略(0.018 LIKE for average fee setting)

如果要進一步創造 Writing NFT,這部分的費用會變成 2 倍,但一樣小到可以忽略(分別是 0.0034 LIKE 及 2.8 LIKE for average fee setting)

對 NFT 收藏者來說

由於收藏用的是 "Grant" 模組,因此費用不會有任何改變。(0.002 LIKE for average fee setting)

對社群整體來說

這些模組的費用收入會被鏈上收集並分配到驗證人以及社群池中(就像 gas 一樣),使生態更健康。

為什麼這對社群很重要?

ISCN 與 Writing NFT 是實用的產品,不只在 Cosmos 生態,在 web3 的世界中也是少數可貴的;然而真正的產品一定伴隨著成本,所以適時地調整鏈上參數讓經濟可持續也很重要。

目前這些費用幾乎是零(考慮到 $LIKE 價格,基本上可以算是免費),所以我認為應該逐漸地調整費用以反應鏈上成本,並且,一個合理的費用結構也能在需求面上改善代幣經濟,這對社群是極為重要的。

作為一個生態參與者,我們應該有意識地避免讓 LikeCoin 成為一個公地悲劇。而這個提案增加的費用僅僅是非常小的改變,因此我相信也不會對產品成長造成負面影響。

作為驗證人,我也想藉著這個機會呼籲社群主動檢視鏈上費用結構、一起參與討論,這只是一個作為拋磚引玉的開始。

CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 版权声明

喜欢我的文章吗?
别忘了给点支持与赞赏,让我知道创作的路上有你陪伴。

加载中…

发布评论