I'm LGBT, tell me what I think

The recent controversy over the LGBT community has been amplified on Matters, and I express my views through a rational exchange of religion and the LGBT community in this article with @AOC @DrunkenDonkey in Hans @weiminzhizhi Also gained a lot of knowledge. I cherish this discussion mode of fighting for reasons and maintaining respect. Therefore, as an LGBT member, I would like to express my opinion on the latest article by this citizen @Red Flags all over the world .

Thank you Hans, Drunk Donkey, William, and the many readers in the comment section for speaking up for me and the entire LGBT community many times. @red flags all over the world My response to you is not to attack and hurt, nor to try to turn you into supporting me and the entire LGBT community. Suffice it to say, in many ways, you misunderstood us.

Reply to your points one by one:

I am a person with a normal personality. If I find out that a same-sex likes me very much, and wants to fuck me, or even wants me to fuck him, then the thought itself is a very, very, very serious violation of me.

You are heterosexual and we must respect your sexual orientation. So if someone wants you to do these things, he's not right. I also hate these people who stick to people casually, no matter how straight they are. I'm ashamed that there are people like this in our community who violated you, and I'm sorry too.

but! Please define what is normal sexual orientation. Is it normal to reproduce? That Dink, Plato, are not normal? Is it normal for most people? That day was also a minority, were they abnormal? Is it normal not to harm the society? Then we are not harming the society.

So in fact gays can only move within their own circle, and it is not difficult for them to get out of this circle.

But this is not the case with smoking. People who don't like the smell of cigarettes are quite disgusted by the behavior of smoking. Therefore, no smoking is required in public places, and there are special smoking rooms.

You're right, you can't just smoke. But smoking and being gay are not the same thing.

One, smoking is a hobby and a choice, and homosexuality is not.

Second, smoking damages the lungs, and second-hand smoke is not good for other people, especially pregnant women and children. But who is it bad for me to be gay?

Third, people who are smoking can be seen at a glance, but sexual orientation is often not seen by appearance. You said that we can only operate in our own circle, so you go to a place and ask "are you gay?" one by one, and then kick out the people who are?

These people should be like the smokers in the smoking room, you can't get out of the smoking room and go out in public to endanger others.

This goes back to the question of "hazardousness". We didn't kiss in public, we didn't yell "I'm gay!" anywhere, and we didn't say anything like "Gays are great, join in". We have no grievances and no enmity, do you feel nauseated when you look at me? The point is, if you see me in person, you don't necessarily know my sexuality.

Your later discussion of degrees of freedom makes sense. But you say that we are not normal, that we are monsters and monsters, I want to ask:

The father of computer science, Alan Turing, was gay.

The founder of Nursing, Florence Nightingale, is gay.

Apple CEO, Tim Cook, is gay.

The former Prime Minister of Iceland, Johanna Sigurdardotti, is also gay. Are they monsters?

If you think they are foreigners and they don't mean anything, what about Qu Yuan? He's gay too, is he a monster? You probably have memorized his poems.

We are not the same except the people we love. We have feelings, we will protect ourselves, and we will respect others, even if the other person hates us and even wants to kill ourselves. How many people who have contributed to the society belong to the LGBT group, and you, killing everyone with one shot, labeling us all "disgusting" and all as "perverted".

Next, let's talk about the AIDS problem that "a grain of wheat" often mentions. You must have the same idea as him on this matter, thinking that all homosexuals have AIDS and are all promiscuous.

The WHO statistics on sexual orientation and HIV infection are as follows:

"Having sex under unprotected conditions, the probability of AIDS infection among gay men is about 0.5% to 3%; while in heterosexual AIDS infection, the probability that the man is infected with the pathogen is 0.1% to 0.2%, and the probability of the woman is 0.1% to 0.2%. Pathogen infection to men is 0.03% to 0.1%, and the probability of lesbian infection is lower than the above cases."

Without protection, gay men are indeed prone to AIDS. This one doesn't have to be washed. I always go to make appointments, there are also group p's, and I think they are unreasonable if they don't take measures. But if you say that 3% is the whole thing, I don't agree. To generalize the whole book is misleading. Just like everyone thinks that Northeasterners are uneducated and of low quality, I was the first to stand up against it because I knew I was not like that. You should also know that you are not the uneducated and low-quality person they say.

Also, you have a logic, if everyone is gay, then there will be no children, and mankind will not perish.

The number of LGBT populations varies from country to country, but does not exceed 10%. What's the meaning? More than 90% of people are people like you who can have children through xxoo. If you do not become extinct, mankind will not become extinct. Stop worrying. Besides, among LGBT people, there are many people who adopt children, and there are many lesbians who use sperm to give birth to children. The world's population is still growing, with 8 billion people just around the corner.

We continue.

Now everyone just needs homosexuality not to come out to harm normal people, to disgust normal people, or not to try to reverse normal people's cognition, but it can't be done.

You think we are disgusting, yes. We're not even trying to reverse your perception, because. . . Can't be reversed. Your concept has been formed, and I am not qualified to force you to support me. But with so many people on Matters supporting me, can you say I reversed their perception? If so, then I'm still pretty good.

Since homosexuals have organized and premeditated attempts to occupy the position of public opinion to reverse the values of children, then why do we normal people not stand up and fight against it?

You should be older than me and probably more qualified to educate children than I am. However, if I had a child, I would say to him: "Homosexuality is not noble, heterosexuality is not noble, only love is noble. I will not advise you to be gay, but if you are, I love you just as much."

Not to mention that sexual orientation has nothing to do with education. Even if it does, the LGBT community has already faced so many disadvantages, misunderstandings, and suppression. Do you think I would be so shameless as to persuade my children to go into troubled waters with me and be criticized?

You want to fight, how to fight? Forcing a child to be another person?

You've seen a lot of domineering gays and lesbians, but I refuse to let them represent all of us. I also have to admit that not all good people are in the LGBT community. I wouldn't unconditionally support everything a person does just because he's LGBT , and even, I agree with some distinctions. For example, gay men cannot donate blood if they have had sex with the same sex, because of the undeniable high probability of HIV infection.

But this does not mean that you can beat gays when you see gays on the street; this does not mean that as a teacher, you can deliberately target gay students and give them a low score; this does not mean that you can deceive gay customers as a salesman; Representatives, as judges, can judge homosexuals more than heterosexuals.

I don't care if you speak ill of me. Because of your punch, it's not a bullet, it's a ball of cotton. But if anyone makes a personal attack on the grounds of sexual orientation, I will use the resilience of cotton to defend our dignity as human beings to the death.

Any idea why I'm studying like crazy? Do you know why I'm in such a hurry to get my name right? Know why I always want to leave the house? Because, only when I become extraordinarily good can I leave the shadows, get out of the closet, and have the most ordinary treatment like heterosexuals. Silence only makes us lambs to be slaughtered.

Whites used to decide whether blacks could vote, men decided whether women could go to school, and now heterosexuals decide whether gays can fall in love. Why.