Zhang Jing, you are still lying!

Today, on the Epoch Times website of the " Truthfulness -Compassion-Forbearance" group, I read an article by Zhang Jing, chairman of "Women's Rights in China", " Zhang Jing: How did the mother of eight children form the purgatory with chains around her neck?" ", this article is Zhang Jing's voa program "Everyone Talks about Current Affairs: Mother of eight children is tied to her neck with a chain in the earth house, what about the purgatory in the rural world?" The article supplemented the remarks that the Xuzhou Iron Chain Girl was reduced to a breeding slave and cast the blame for family planning. The purpose of her writing this article was to "solidify" her conclusion that human trafficking was blamed on family planning.

Then I will analyze the cases provided by Zhang Jing in the article to see if they can support her conclusions.

First of all, Zhang Jingwen quoted data from the book "Ancient Sins", stating that " from 1986 to 1989 (when the book was published), 48,100 women were trafficked from various provinces to 6 counties in Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province. ."

If the age of 20 is used as the adult standard (actually many bachelors are over 30 years old), then according to the years 1986-1989 mentioned in the data, it can be calculated that those men who bought women in Xuzhou should be born in 1969 and before . They are singles, which means that they cannot find women of the same age as themselves to marry in the local area. That is to say, there is a serious gender imbalance in the local marriageable population born before 1969, with more men than women . Family planning was gradually implemented from the late 1970s to the early 1980s and was written into the constitution in 1982. Therefore, these men in Xuzhou who were born in 1969 at the latest were bachelors and had nothing to do with family planning .

In fact, as far as the woman who became a reproductive slave in Fengxian County, Xuzhou was concerned, due to the mandatory family planning and birth spacing measures, the family planning policy actually gave her unintentionally for 10 years. some protection. On the contrary, it was the "free birth" brought by anti-birth control factions such as Yi Fuxian, Yang Zhu, Zhang Jing, etc., which led to the gradual relaxation of the family planning policy. , became a breeding slave of the Dong family. (Refer to " The Mystery of the Girls' Gap in Xuzhou Iron Chains ")

Let’s analyze several “opened cases” mentioned by Zhang Jingwen.

The first case, "Deng Lu, a girl who was abducted, trafficked and abused in Wangwu Village, Beiyu Township, Susong County, Anhui Province", I searched several times on the Internet, except for this article by Zhang Jing reprinted on the "Truthfulness-Compassion-Forbearance" website Other than that, no clues were found. Zhang Jing also concealed the age of the bachelor who bought and abused Deng Lu, so only Zhang Jing knew whether the bachelor was born in the family planning era.

The second case was Ma Panyan, Wushan Tong’s bride-in-law. Of course, Zhang Jing once again concealed the age or birth year of the man who bought Ma Panyan, student Chen. However, the impact of this case is relatively large, and it is not difficult to find out the age of student Chen. According to wiki data, in 2001, Student Chen was 29 years old. It can be calculated that he was born in 1972 , also in the pre-family planning era.

The third case mentioned by Zhang Jing, the case of Chen Xiaoping in Hunan, is based on the phrase "A 76-year-old man and his 29-year-old wife are lovingly guarded by the first episode of the 2013 Hunan Metropolitan TV Station "Seeking Love". In other words, it can also be easily calculated that the old bachelor Li Yaxun was born in 1937. He was a bachelor, and he couldn't even fight with family planning.

Zhang Jing also mentioned the case of "there are more than 150 households in the village of Xiaqian Township, Fenghuang County, and there are more than 40 people who can't find a wife if they are over 30 years old." But I searched Google several times, but I couldn't find any "Xiaqian Township" in Fenghuang County, Hunan Province, but only one town of Qiangongping. Combining the search keywords "Qiangongping" and "bachelor", I found such an article " Documentary on Targeted Poverty Alleviation of Hunan's "One Visit and Two Visits" , which mentioned that when local cadres went to poverty alleviation in 2015 , "in Changqing In the village, like Guo Wensong, there are as many as 51 people over the age of 35 who are still working as bachelors.”

Over 35 years old in 2015, indicating that these bachelors were all born before 1980 . The selective abortion of female fetuses caused by the popularization of B-ultrasound technology after the implementation of family planning mainly occurred in and after the 1990s. This batch of bachelors in Changqing Village could not find wives, mainly due to the serious gender imbalance of the local population born before 1980 (Mu Guangzong said in "There are 34.9 million "baches" in our country! Is the single society coming? "" The post-80s generation has an excess of 1.3836 million males”), making it impossible for them to find women of their own age to marry. Those people who played bachelors had something to do with the family planning policy, but it didn't matter much. This is because the most stringent and harsh period of family planning in China did not include the 1970s, as Zhang Jing said, but the mid-to-late 1980s and 1990s. . The mass selective abortion of female fetuses brought about by the popularization of B-ultrasound technology in the late 1980s also occurred in the 1990s and later: “By the mid-1990s, all county-level hospitals, township-level clinics, and family planning offices were equipped with Ultrasound scanners to identify gender before birth." (Refer to "The Missing Baby Girl: Ultrasound Technology and Gender Imbalance ")

Therefore, the five cases in China listed by Zhang Jing in the article, plus the recent case in Xuzhou, are six in total. Except for one of them, no third-party evidence could be found on the Internet, and the rest either had nothing to do with family planning, or had little to do with family planning. These cases simply cannot support Zhang Jing's conclusion that the rampant trafficking and sale of women in China "is the result of the nearly 40-year-long one-child policy."

Speaking of which, I remembered that I commented on the video that voa posted on youtube a few days ago. Someone told me conclusively that the serious gender imbalance in China is entirely caused by family planning. Before family planning There is no serious sex ratio imbalance.

What is the actual situation? Let's take a look at the data from the first census of the PRC in 1953 (refer to the wiki entry "The First National Census of the People's Republic of China ").

In 1953, shortly after the PRC was "founded", there was no exaggeration and no family planning. Therefore, there was no motive for overreporting or underreporting the population. The data from this census should be relatively reliable.

From the data in the screenshot above, we can see that in 1953, the population of all age groups in China from the age of 0 to 59 had an imbalance in the sex ratio of males to females. After calculation, I found that:

There are 2,934,646 more men aged 0-4 than women, or more than 2.93 million, about 6.8% more men than women, and the sex ratio is close to 107 ;
There are 3,754,345 more men aged 5-9 than women, or more than 3.75 million, about 12.7% more men than women, and the sex ratio is close to 113 ;
There are 4,374,748 more men aged 10-14 than women, or more than 4.37 million, about 17.7% more men than women, and the sex ratio is close to 118 ;
There are 2,419,181 more men aged 15-19 than women, or more than 2.41 million, about 9.8% more men than women, and the sex ratio is close to 110 ;
There are 1,111,803 more men aged 20-24 than women, or more than 1.11 million;
There are 1,107,467 more men aged 25-29 than women, or more than 1.1 million;
There are 1,103,470 more men aged 30-34 than women, or more than 1.1 million;
There are 1,275,660 more men aged 35-39 than women, or more than 1.27 million;
There are 1,253,725 more men aged 40-44 than women, or more than 1.25 million;
There were 592,307 more men aged 45-49 than women, nearly 600,000;
There are 514,263 more men aged 50-54 than women, or more than 510,000;
There are 236,380 more men aged 55-59 than women, or more than 230,000;

Analyzing these data, I found that the sex ratio imbalance in the 0-19 age group is the most serious, with a total of 13,482,920 more men than women, reaching more than 13.48 million ; 20-59 men 7,195,075 more than women, nearly 7.2 million . Men aged 0-59 outnumbered women by a total of 20,677,995, or more than 20.67 million .

On the surface, the gender imbalance in the 20-59 age group at that time does not seem to be too serious, but it should be noted that before 1953, China experienced three large-scale wars in succession: the Anti-Japanese War, the Second Kuomintang-Communist Civil War and the Korean War . War will lead to the death of a large number of soldiers (mainly male young adults), and the main warring countries in Europe after the two world wars and Japan after World War II have experienced "man shortage", which shows that the war caused men (especially men) young adults) how severe the reduction.

On the other hand, China experienced three consecutive wars that lasted for more than ten years before 1953. Not only did there not appear to be a "men shortage", but the population of young and middle-aged men was actually larger than that of women of the same age. If there was no war, then the young and middle-aged men would have It is hard to imagine how serious the actual gender imbalance would be.

We might as well use the data provided by the wiki to make a simple estimate. According to the wiki entry " The Second Civil War between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party", in the second civil war between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, the death toll of the Kuomintang army alone was as high as 8,071,350 . These dead soldiers are naturally mainly male. According to the calculation of the death toll of the national army, the three large-scale wars should have killed at least 10 million male soldiers in China (including the two parties of the Kuomintang and the Communist Party). These soldiers are naturally mainly young adults aged 20-59.

In addition, there is a small line at the bottom of the screenshot of the previous wiki page about the data of the first census in 1953: "Does not include unidentified age and active military personnel." It is difficult to find out the number of people whose age is unknown. But it is not difficult to find out the number of active military personnel. According to the " Several Major Streamlining and Reorganization of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (after 1949) ", at the end of 1953, there were still about 4.2 million troops in the streamlined CCP army, and these soldiers were naturally dominated by men.

The magnitude of the gender imbalance in this age group is immediately apparent if you include the soldiers killed in several major wars and those in active service in 1953 (both predominantly male) (at least 15 million) Now: 20-59-year-old men should actually outnumber women by more than 20 million (10 million + 4.2 million + 7.2 million ). Combined with the 13.48 million 0-19 year old population, we can say with great certainty that in the middle of the last century, China's 0-59 year old male population should have been at least around 35 million more than women had it not been for a few large-scale wars. At that time, China's population was only more than 600 million, and the number of soldiers and civilians killed in the war was estimated to be less than 700 million.

In the middle of the last century, when there was only about 700 million people, there were 35 million more men than women aged 0-59 in China. Today, there are about the same size of bachelors in the population of 1.4 billion. Which era has a more serious gender imbalance? Something obvious at a glance?

These data at once dispel the lie of the anti-birth control group that the sex ratio imbalance in the pre-family planning era was not serious.

History and reality have repeatedly proved that the main factor leading to the imbalance of sex ratio in China and other Asian countries is the abnormal death of women caused by the idea of male superiority (including infanticide, torture and selective abortion after the popularization of B-ultrasound technology). The sex ratio imbalance in China's family planning era is just a continuation of the sex ratio imbalance that has lasted for hundreds or even thousands of years. The phenomenon of human trafficking and trafficking in China is almost as "long history" as the idea of male superiority. The local governments' public security women's federations and other departments do nothing to abduct and sell women, or even help them to abuse them. In addition to the corruption of officials, they are also influenced by the patriarchal society's tradition of not treating women as human beings.

In the second half of her article, Zhang Jing listed a large number of women from Southeast Asian countries being trafficked to China, but this is just a continuation of China's long-standing ideology of male superiority, long-term gender imbalance, and long-term human trafficking. She blamed it all on family planning, a blatant lie.

By throwing the blame for gender imbalance and human trafficking to the "universal scapegoat" for family planning, Zhang Jing hid the real culprit behind all these problems—a patriarchal family that favors sons over daughters and has more sons and more happiness. , to cover up the monstrous crime that the patriarchal family has been drowned, murdered, tortured and murdered women for thousands of years, and then abducted, imprisoned, raped and forced women to conceive and give birth. Zhang Jing, the chairman of "Women's Rights in China", is actually an accomplice of a patriarchal family that has harmed women for thousands of years.

As a liar full of lies, Zhang Jing should rename her "Chinese women's rights" to "Chinese patriarchal rights" or "Chinese husband rights", perhaps closer to the truth.