This article by Zhang Yan declares the victory of the Communist Party's "Wolf Warrior" diplomacy!

When I saw Zhang Yan’s article in The New York Times, “ Mr. Biden, Stop “Speaking Hard” to China,” I thought at first that the author meant to advise the Biden administration to stop talking to the CCP bandits ( Ruthless words) without practice (without taking practical measures), and as a result, I clicked on the article and saw that it was to persuade Biden to kneel and lick the CCP bandits!

I still underestimate the "party spirit" of The New York Times.

If I guessed correctly, Yang Jiechi's "wolf power" in Alaska was a pre-estimation that Biden's Democratic government would be submissive to the CCP bandits, so it was like the pheasant that flew to my yard to eat perilla seeds. "Hohohoho!" shouted for a while, bluffing and preempting others, scaring the Americans for a moment, and they can wait for Biden to "visit Xi" at the Xi -Xi meeting.

After reading Zhang Yan's bad ideas for Biden, I just want to say one thing: when a person encounters a rogue for the first time, he is a gentleman with the heart of a gentleman; however, if a gentleman is a gentleman Knowing that the other party is a rogue who has no credibility at all, but still treats the belly of a villain with the heart of a gentleman, that is stupid.

For example, when talking about the CCP's "suppression of political freedom in Hong Kong," Zhang Yan actually believed that "the orders carried out by these officials were collectively issued by the Chinese Communist Party." Xi Fanzhu is not allowed to arbitrarily discuss the Central Committee for so many years, and has carried out a " set in one " personality cult for so many years. The so-called "collective decision-making" of the CCP has long become the personal will of Xi Fanzhu. As a reporter who "lived in China for 20 years", how could Zhang Yan not understand such a simple fact?

There is also the Confucius Institute that hangs Confucius' "sheep's head" and sells the "dog meat" of the CCP dictatorship. It is almost an open spy and infiltration agency in the United States and other countries. Zhang Yan actually puts it on the same level as the Goethe Institute and the British Council. Demands that Confucius Institutes be allowed to "operate off campus." If the thief is driven from the house to the street, will the world be at peace?

Restarting the Peace Corps and the Fulbright Scholarship are two things. The former is simply to provide raw materials for the CCP to engage in "hostage diplomacy", while the latter can almost be regarded as opening the door to thieves and bringing wolves into the house. Under the rule of Xi Wenzhu, what kind of "scholars" can the CCP bandits send out through the government to study abroad, do you still need to guess?

Thinking that most of the 91.914 million Communist Party members are just "civil servants engaged in ordinary work", Zhang Yan does not understand how the grassroots officials of the Communist Party and bandits stand in the head of the common people and make a fortune. In my hometown for a year, I witnessed how these "civil servants engaged in ordinary work" made things difficult for ordinary people: when someone needed to go to the village committee to do something, the dog officials said that they used the wrong pen to write the certificate, and then said The signature is not standardized... I made people run back and forth three times. Finally, the non-smoking uncle bought a pack of the most expensive cigarettes to honor the sesame officials of the village committee. Sealed.

Everyone who joins the Communist Party wants to gain power and financial benefits from the Communist Party, a super-bullying landlord group, which is a benefit that ordinary people cannot get. And most of them are people who swear by false oaths. They are all state capitalist capitalist capitalism. How many fools would really believe in authentic communism?

Of course, Zhang Yan is so long-winded and rambling, and perhaps suggesting that Biden withdraw Trump's order to expel the fake reporters from the Communist Party's official media is the real core. But, Mr. Zhang Yan, do you think it's possible for Beijing to "agreed once again to allow journalists accredited by US news organizations to return to China and promise not to harass them "? The dignified Sino-British Joint Declaration, which has been filed with the United Nations, is invalid if the CCP bandits say it is invalid. Such an unbelievable ruffian, would you dare to believe it if you make a promise?

Of course, these measures Zhang Yan said were "not gifts", but tributes from the Democratic Party of the United States to the CCP bandits to kneel down and beg for peace.

When I was playing on Twitter before, I saw that Chu Bailiang recommended Yi Fuxian's "demographic papers" full of lies. I once satirized him as a graduate of Renmin University (an alumnus of Mao Sanpang). Now reading Zhang Yan's article, I feel that such a talent is not like Yang Zaohanchun who joins the nationality of the Chao Dynasty, or even enjoys the demographic dividend of smog, tyranny, and overcrowding with the people of the Chao Dynasty, which is really a waste.

I used to think that The New York Times was a newspaper of the Democratic Party, but after reading this article by Zhang Yan, I realized that Dare Lovers is a newspaper of the Communist Party!

Speaking of which, these reporters in China have been in Xichao for a decade or two, but I think their eyes and vision have probably never surpassed Beijing's Third Ring Road -- but they have never really seen the Forbidden City next to the Second Ring Road. The ambitions of those gangsters are burning like fire.

When the reporters of "Three Rings Brain" dealt with Yi Fuxian, a liar who pretended to be "Mr. Sai", and Xi Wenzhu, a ruffian who pretended to be "Mr. De", they were all brain-damaged.