Russia is not invading Ukraine, and sending troops is based on self-protection?

Mar 9, 2022

I read this yesterday at Dr. Du Chengzhe
"Duri Has Expectations" Tiangu Satellite TV's statement actually sang double reeds with "this special page"? Is it plagiarism, or is it the same manuscript at all?

When I think about the US election, thanks to the power of algorithms, I watched several Tengu TV videos by chance, and also watched a QAnon documentary that was blocked by the whole network. In short, I was a little curious about the conspiracy theories and the deep government. What are the themes talking about, I didn't expect that these might be high-level information warfare farms. This article does not include Tiangu TV's videos. If you want to watch it, you can search for it yourself on YouTube.

Not to mention that the metaphor in the film gives people a sense of homophobia, and there is suspicion of helping Russia with grease, I just think, according to him, can't everything in the world be explained by the same theory? ? Anyway, it can be attributed to the ruling group, for its own interests, to detonate regional conflicts and cut the bottom people like leeks.

In fact, since I was a child, I have heard from time to time the argument that the United States is trying to provoke dissension and open the battlefield in order to obtain benefits from it (how can arms sell without provoking discord), and I used to think that the United States is very rogue and disgusting. Anyway, he is not the first to advocate this argument. Yes, many people in China sincerely believe in this set, but I don't know why their logic is directly linked from "the United States is a hooligan and cannot be trusted" to all kinds of capitulationism and appeasement thinking. The thinking that can influence some people may be this kind of thinking. Paradoxically, the purpose of the promotional video! ? It is one thing not to believe in the United States, and it is also true that the United States puts its own interests first (but which country in the world is not?), but not believing in the United States does not mean that the dictatorship should condone aggression against others, right ? It doesn't matter if your reason is self-preservation or denazification or whatever. It is true that a small country can only be used as a flag, but being a chess piece is at least better than if it is not the core interests of others and no one cares about it.... Right? There are Rachel gangs everywhere in the United States. If the international order must choose sides, then I would rather stand in the camp that has less impact on my freedom of speech and human rights ( ~~although I have to pay protection fees~~ )