[Three-Headed Dog Chain] SF RES Land Voting Record

Following Daisy's article , it has been explained in detail what the three motions are. I will not repeat it.

Briefly talk about the comments and voting directions of the three motions.

Motion 3:

It's completely random proposals to take advantage of the low cost of proposals. And he himself is happy to see the deposit confiscated.

This guy is very well known in HUAHUA discord or Cerberus discord. I really don't dare to compliment, and I don't want to say good or bad.

SF RES Land voted No with Veto.

Motion 4

The team that appeared out of nowhere, the lion opened its mouth, but it was not developing anything, and even the proposal for the use of the community fund and the proposal for the text could not be distinguished. It must have come for luck.

SF RES Land voted No.

Motion 5

The verification people saw the chaos on the day of the launch of proposals 3 and 4, and decided to propose amendments to increase the proposal deposit.

But there is an out-of-package position, the text says 15M CRBRUS, but the submitted one is 10M CRBRUS. The proposer forgot to change the text.

But anyway, SF RES Land absolutely supports it!