"Christian belief is also a culture of killing children!"

In Western Christian religious paintings, there is a relatively important theme, depicting a group of babies called "Holy Innocents". This type of painting usually shows the Virgin Mary holding the baby Jesus, surrounded by a group of boys, like the painting in the screenshot below:

As we all know, China has a fertility tradition of having more sons and more blessings, in which the "child" refers specifically to the "son". Therefore, after the spread of Buddhism to China, Chinese believers forcibly created a new idol of worship, namely "Guan Yin of Sending Children" (in some places, this idol is generalized as "Sending Children Goddess", perhaps to satisfy non-Buddhists Demands for a Child), usually depicting Guanyin holding a baby boy or two (some drawings even show the baby boy's chick), as in the screenshot below:

Because the two painting themes seem very similar on the surface, I sometimes joke with Christians that in order to spread Christianity successfully in China, they should make the Virgin Mary a Christian version of the "Girlfriend".

Christians are usually silent about my malicious and ulterior motives. Because they know too much about the creepy "dark history" or dark story behind "Holy Innocents" (I don't know if the word "history" is accurate here).

Those innocent and lovable innocent boys were not dolls given to any good man and believing woman by the Virgin. On the contrary, they were killed by King Herod because of Jesus. In other words, they were killed by Jesus and his own father, Jehovah (that He was indirectly killed by the tyrannical "dictatorship god" who slaughtered cities and even exterminated human beings at every turn.

From this perspective, Christian belief, "also" is a culture of killing children (how well the word "also" is used).

But this sentence is not from me, but from Pastor Wang Yi, a fan of counterfeiting master Yi Fuxian. If you don't believe me, please see the screenshot below:

When I first read Pastor Wang Yi's words, I couldn't help but feel a little bit of admiration for him: I didn't expect him to be so honest and dare to admit the dark side of his beliefs.

However, such admiration soon disappeared, because I continued to read the article, and I realized that Wang Yi was not reflecting on their "dictatorial god" who killed innocent babies indiscriminately, and even gave in to save his own son. Herod's act of killing innocent boys under the age of two in the city of Bethlehem (see Matthew 2:16).

By "killing sons," Wang Yi refers to the fact that Yahweh is said to have sacrificed his son Jesus in order to save mankind. That is to say, he pretended to criticize Christianity in a quaint way, but in fact he was washing the ground and flattering Jehovah.

Why do you say that? Please open the Bible and read it carefully.

When Jehovah sent angels to Sodom and Gomorrah to set fire to the cities and carry out terrorist attacks, Jehovah never spared the innocent children in the city, let alone the innocent fetuses still in the womb. At least, according to the records of the Bible (see "Genesis" 18-19), He never said that he would forgive them, and in the end, the only ones who managed to escape from Sodom and survived were the Lot family (his wife looked back only because A glance at the burning city of Sodom was tragically killed by the Lord and turned into a pillar of salt), which can prove that the innocent children and fetuses in the city were indeed killed by the Lord.

When Jehovah used the Great Flood to exterminate mankind, He also never spared those innocent children in the world, not to mention the innocent fetuses still in the womb. At least, according to the biblical record (see Genesis 6-7), He never said that he would forgive them.

Yahweh was tireless, long-winded, and instructed Noah in detail how to build the ark: what wood to use, how many dimensions for the length, width and height, how many layers to build the ark, how high the windows, and where the doors should be opened... But He did not have one Words speak of those innocent babies and fetuses, not a word of forgiveness for them.

Jehovah was tireless, long-winded, and instructed in detail which animals Noah should take on the ark, and how many animals of each type... However, He did not mention a single word of those innocent babies and fetuses, not a single word of the need for Forgive them.

All this proves that the innocent children and fetuses were indeed killed by Jehovah.

When Herod slaughtered innocent boys under the age of two in Bethlehem, Jehovah also did nothing to save them.

According to Christians, Jehovah is all-powerful, so he must have a way to save those children. But He only sent an angel to inform Jesus' adoptive father in advance, and asked them to escape with Jesus overnight. As for the innocent boys under the age of two in the city of Bethlehem, the Lord did nothing to save them, and watched Herod kill them so cruelly (see Matthew 2:13-16). He is omnipotent. If he wants to create the world, he will create the world. If he wants to create a flood, he will create a flood. If he wants to turn man into a pillar of salt, he can turn man into a pillar of salt. He just needs to show any spirit or perform any miracle to save those children.

But He did nothing.

Even if we assume that Jehovah's divine power is insufficient or ineffective in the presence of Herod, He could have chosen to sacrifice Jesus and save those innocent children. After all, according to Christianity, Jesus was destined to die for the salvation of mankind. Anyway, early is a sacrifice and late is a sacrifice. Why didn’t the Lord let Jesus sacrifice when he could save innocent lives, but insisted on letting him sacrifice his life in vain when he could have escaped, and also let Pilate carry a back. What about the black pot?

This is totally illogical and irrational.

In any case, when Jehovah could choose to sacrifice his own sons to save the lives of innocent infants, he selfishly chose to protect his own sons while sacrificing those innocent infants.

In this sense, Christianity is not only a culture of "killing children", it is also a culture of "killing babies" and "killing babies". The scope and cruelty (burning to death, drowning, or murdering with a knife) of Jehovah’s killing of fetuses and infants far exceeds that of the CCP’s Family Planning Commission.

So, what qualifications do Christians who have always devoutly believed in such "infanticide" and "fetus killing" religions pretend to be good people and condemn the CCP for forced abortion?

If you are a true Christian (not the kind of unloving people who use "God's judgment" all day long to intimidate and curse others, and every time they involve the CCP's crimes, they take the Chinese people to the robbery. The CCP bandits take the blame and curse the Chinese people in the name of false gods, or they are simply five-haired dogs sent by the CCP bandits to disguise themselves as Christians and provoke mutual hatred among the people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait), if my above reasoning makes you feel uncomfortable, you feel that you have been subjected to Offended, then I can only express my great regret.

But I'm not finished yet.

In fact, I've always had a lot of respect for Christianity—or, more accurately, Christians or ex-Christians who truly understand God's love and seek salvation for mankind through fact-based research.

For example, Anglican priest Thomas Robert Malthus was one of the first Christians to break through the myth of "I will make your descendants extremely numerous, if not countless" in the Bible and to study the problem of "overpopulation" realistically. .

His research is said to have influenced Charles Darwin, who studied theology at Christ's College, Cambridge, another scientist who pierced through Christian creation legends and developed the theory of evolution.

Malthus' theories also led to the first modern census in Britain, and even inspired some to promote birth control (though he himself opposed it).

If humanity is not now living in a more crowded world and being forced to suffer more from "Malthusian disasters" like Covid-19, then we can thank Malthus for being a pragmatic Christian and scholar (he is said to be a British and even the world's first scholar of political economy).

Christianity has produced so many great scientists and brought benefits to mankind. This is because they are not stuck to the literal meaning of the Bible, and they put the love of Christ in their hearts rather than their mouths.

If you are a true Christian, think about the true meaning of God's destruction of mankind and the use of the ark to save lives of all kinds.

If this world is really created by God, then please remember: human beings are not the only creation of God, other colorful life on this planet is also created by God, they have the same "natural right to live on earth" as human beings ".

God may indeed have authorized human beings to govern all things in the world, but He never said that human beings can destroy this planet and destroy other life He created at will in order to satisfy their greedy desires (including the desire for more children).

You can criticize the human rights violations that exist in family planning, but do you really think that it is correct to make false claims and encourage fertility despite the obvious fact that China's population is still huge?

You can keep fooling yourself.

But I have followed my conscience