Chat │ Literati Xiangqing

Literati is light, since ancient times.

 Literati despised each other, since ancient times.

Cao Pi, Classical essays.

I still remember that in high school, there was this article in the Chinese textbook. At that time, I just thought it was very boring. I didn’t expect that one day I would be able to remember this article.

In my opinion, this article written by Cao Pi is the most suitable for the theory of rubbish essays in Matt City. Others' articles may be rubbish articles, but my own article is definitely not rubbish. It definitely has a certain value. Isn't this kind of thought a contempt?

Madam is good at self-seeing, but the writing is not one, and she is seldom able to prepare good things. The Chinese language says: "The family has a broom and enjoys a thousand pieces of gold."

 It is easy to see your own advantages, but there is not only one genre of articles, and few people are proficient in various genres, so they often use their own strengths to despise others' weaknesses. As the saying goes, the broken broom at home is regarded as a treasure. I just can't see my own blemishes.

I think it's a good thing to have confidence in your own work and in the field you are good at. After all, if you are not sure about your own work, who would appreciate it? However, Matt City is a big boiler. There is no special restriction on what kind of themes or what kind of style can be written. As long as the content does not violate the community norms, it can be written. Unlike some websites, he There are limited topics, such as science and technology articles, travel food, or novels. If you go to a technology-related website to publish historical articles, it will be wrong, because this is called the wrong title, so I think, as long as it is in Matt City The original articles are all valuable.

Besides, everyone is good at different fields. Some people are good at novels, some people are good at literature, history and philosophy, some people just want to write a diary in Matt City, and who can be proficient in all fields. If you only study history today , if you were asked to write a science and technology article that you did not study at all, would you write it? So why bother with in-depth essays or everyday essays? Because each has his own strengths, he also has some things he doesn't understand. Because of this, Matt City has a variety of characteristics. Wouldn't it be nice to find inspiration in other people's articles?

When you despise the work of others, similarly, your own work is also likely to be despised by others.

The reason is very simple, because no article can be liked by 100% of the people.

Why do you say that?

It may be because of the author's own relationship, because of personal interests, or because of personal opinions or because of the writing style of the other party.

Some people will because they don't like a certain author, and at the same time they don't like any of the other's works, but this is not the right way to write about people, and I think this is a loss of objective appreciation.

Some people will be interested, if you are asked to read an article that you are not interested in, can you read it? Do you even understand appreciation? Likewise, it is also possible that other people will not be interested in the articles they write

Because everyone's background, experience, and thinking mode are different, there is no need to use their own subjective consciousness and the views they agree with to press on other people's bodies. discuss.

In my opinion, unless a person is very talented in writing and writing, who can write a moving article from the very beginning? I think that you can give advice to the other party, but you don't need to be sarcastic. When you give advice to the other party, it is also a kind of learning for yourself.

Based on the above reasons, when criticizing whether other people's articles are waste, can you also reflect on it, and others may also be criticizing your own works from his point of view?

Having said so much, the ancients despised each other because of their survival. After all, in ancient times, the competition among literati represented their worth, so what happened to the literati in Matt City?

Is it because of personal preference? Or do you wish Matt City was better?

If it is said to criticize because of personal preference, then I think it is quite selfish, because everyone has the right to write their own articles.

Wish Matt City was better? I think the officials of Matt City will be more nervous than everyone else, because if Matt City no longer exists, the people in the Matt City team may lose their jobs.

No matter what the reason, why are literati often condescending to each other, instead of choosing to meet friends through literature, or even know each other and cherish each other?

Isn't it good to go around looking for like-minded authors, and learn from each other and grow up with each other?

Why highlight your own strengths by criticizing others' weaknesses?

In short, I think that every original work, no matter what style or theme, has its own value, and this value should not be determined by others, because when everyone reads the article, they are often affected by their own subjective consciousness. To influence, to affect one's own preferences, should articles that are not of interest to oneself become worthless?

I would like to ask, what do you think of literati Xiangli?