"Truthfulness-Compassion-Forbearance" has Edwards, and the Communists have Edwards
Today, I read an article in The Epoch Times titled "The ratio of males and females is imbalanced in Xuzhou's first blind date conference. Five females meet more than 100 males ", which mentioned:
In response to the imbalance between males and females, Epoch Times commentator Edward wrote an article in 2019, "Records of Communist Tyranny: Family Planning is the Baby-Slaughtering War that Destroyed China (Part 2)", saying that the ratio of males and females is seriously imbalanced, and China's population structure is seriously deformed in the shape of an inverted pyramid. It is the result of the CCP’s family planning tyranny.
So I found the article " Records of Communist Tyranny: Family Planning is the Infant-Slaughtering War that Destroyed China (Part 2) " written by that "Edward", to see what this brick home was talking about.
I have to admit that the article was written with the characteristics of "Truthfulness-Compassion-Forbearance". However, when I wanted to take screenshots to preserve evidence, I found that the screenshot tool on my computer could not be used. Yesterday, I used a lot of web screenshots to prove that Zhang Jing was lying. Today, my screenshot tool was damaged by hackers. Why is it so coincidental?
Although the screenshot tool can't be used, I still have a mobile phone to take pictures. This is the argument I saw in the "Edward" article:
According to the "China Health Statistical Yearbook 2010", from 1980 to 2009, there were 286 million women's laparotomy, nearly 99 million women's tubal ligation operations, and 275 million induced abortions. China records at least 1,300 induced abortions every year. It is the country with the largest number of abortions in the world, and this is only the official statistics of the CCP. According to the U.S. State Department, there are 23 million abortions per year in China, and an average of more than 63,013 unborn babies die from abortions every day, or 2,625 abortions per hour, or 43 abortions per minute.
If calculated at 13 million per year, over 36 years, at least 468 million fetuses have been slaughtered . If calculated at 23 million per year, over 36 years, at least 828 million fetuses have been slaughtered.
I don’t know if you have seen the problem with these data: whether it is the official data of the Communist government or the so-called “data from the U.S. State Department”, there is no distinction between those abortions which are forced abortions by the Family Planning Commission and which are voluntary abortions by women . And this "Edward" described all these abortions as the "massacre" of the fetuses by family planning, and all of them were counted on the head of the Family Planning Commission.
This is like when the Public Security Bureau caught a murder suspect, and then the Procuratorate charged him with killing the victim, but also found a group of people to give false testimony, saying that those who committed suicide and accidental deaths were also killed by the suspect. , wishing to sentence him to death 10,000 times.
Dear "Edward", you are falsely witnessing and falsely accusing the Family Planning Commission, do you know that?
Then "Edward" said:
A survey in 2007 showed that among the 150,000 family planning technical service personnel in China at that time, 50,000 did not have medical qualifications. In the 1980s and 1990s even fewer qualified...
I can attest to this that what "Edward" said is true. Not to mention family planning service personnel, in fact, from the Mao era to the present, most of the barefoot doctors who have provided basic medical services to farmers in the vast rural areas of China have not received systematic medical training, let alone any “medical qualifications” ( In the Mao era and in the 1980s, there was no such qualification for barefoot doctors), many of them were either following the existing local traditional Chinese medicine, or studying in the local township health college, and some people subscribed to medicine Magazine self-taught. In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, the government began to organize these barefoot doctors and do some training. I know this because I have relatives who are barefoot doctors.
Before the 21st century, even the barefoot doctors at the grassroots level in rural China did not have "medical qualifications", let alone family planning service personnel. Taking this to prove that family planning is unreasonable and that family planning operations are not standardized, it is completely "why not eat minced meat".
Unlike the barefoot doctor, Yi Fuxian has received formal medical training, and may have a "medical qualification". However, he did not stay in the country to serve the masses, but went to the United States to deceive and lie to the Chinese to have more babies. These brick-and-mortar households who are exporting to domestic sales do more harm to the Chinese than those barefoot doctors or family planning committee service personnel who do not have "medical qualifications".
I am too lazy to refute what "Edward" talks about next, "the consequences of the 'one-child' policy". Sex ratio imbalance is a problem that has existed in China since ancient times. I have already proved this with clear and detailed evidence in " Zhang Jing, You Continue to Lie ".
The "bad consequence" of "Family Planning Commission officials acting as international human traffickers" is that a large number of abandoned babies were adopted by Westerners. For example, Kai Owens, who represented the United States in the Winter Olympics this time, was able to receive a good education and grow up healthily, instead of being like a Like Liu Xuezhou, who was resold by his biological parents through the "accumulated virtue" traffickers, he was abandoned by his biological parents twice, and was forced to commit suicide by an online mob instigated by the anti-birth control media "Beijing News". How "evil" is this "evil consequence" caused by the Family Planning Commission? Compared with those traffickers who "accumulate virtue and do good deeds" written by Yang Zhizhu, which one is more evil? "Edward" Xian Sen, take your time.
"Edward"'s point of view expressed in the part of "family planning can lead to extinction of races", I think it is very worthy of attention, because this is precisely the fact that when Xi Wenzhu liberalized family planning for Han Chinese, he forced sterilization on Xinjiang Uyghurs and other Muslims. The viewpoint of the "Great Han Chinese Anti-Birth Control Faction" . So I purposely photographed that part of the text as evidence. I'm too lazy to verify those numbers. A high-end subject like metaphysics is not something that a native who graduated from a non-famous school like me can understand.
"Edward" Xiansen then said, "Without the implementation of 'one-child birth', China's population will not 'explode'", but he obviously forgot that he said at the beginning of the article, "If it is calculated at 13 million per year, 36 Over the past few years, at least 468 million fetuses have been slaughtered. If we count 23 million per year, at least 828 million fetuses have been slaughtered in the past 36 years." 400-800 million fewer people were born. 400 million - 800 million! This is not what a population explosion is.
If "Edward" Xiansen can't be kind, at least he must not contradict himself, let alone contradict himself in the same article.
I won't talk about the family planning in Taiwan and India. At least this overturns the view of some anti-birth control camps that only the most wicked Communist bandits in the whole world practice family planning, and India is doing family planning again recently . Why are Indians so "stupid" that they have to pick up the garbage discarded by the Chinese as a treasure and take it home for their own use? I don't understand this either.
At the end of his article, "Edward" Senson mentioned that the family planning policy violated international and domestic laws, which completely distorted the original intention of the 1968 United Nations International Human Rights Conference "Tehran Declaration" to protect citizens' reproductive rights: to prevent women from being used by patriarchal families as a reproductive tool.
"Edward" Senson quoted the "Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women" in " men and women 'have the same right to freely and responsibly determine the number of children and the spacing of births '", the original text in the English version of CEDAW looks like this :
...women have equal rights as men in their choice of whom to marry and whether to marry, and any matters relating to the birth, adoption, and raising of children, such as the spacing and number of children.
A more accurate translation is " Women have the same rights as men to choose who to marry and whether to marry, and have equal rights with men in any aspect related to childbearing, adoption, and raising children, such as spacing between births and the number of children they have. right of choice”. Like "Edward " Xiansen, the simplification of "women have equal rights with men" to "men and women" and putting men ahead of women is actually opening an unimpeded path for patriarchal families to violate women's reproductive rights through husbands. the back door.
The CCP's family planning is to prevent the patriarchal family from infringing on women's reproductive rights. The strong woman in Xuzhou was chained and forced to give birth to 8 children. Therefore, family planning itself is in line with international law, but in the process of implementation, it has been overweighted by the grassroots, resulting in violent family planning.
From the perspective of domestic law, the first paragraph of Article 47 of the "Law on the Protection of Women's Rights and Interests" stipulates: "Women have the right to bear children in accordance with the relevant provisions of the state, and also have the freedom not to bear children ." Interpretation of Several Issues in the Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China (3) "Article 9 also stipulates that " where a husband requests compensation for damages on the grounds that the wife's unauthorized termination of pregnancy violates her reproductive rights, the people's court shall not support it." The spirit of the Convention on Discrimination ensures women's right to freedom from childbirth and abortion. The original intention of formulating family planning is also to protect women's rights.
Of course, there are also some high-end elite women who have been brainwashed by the idea of having more children in patriarchal families and Christian brainwashing. This issue is a bit complicated, and I will not discuss it here for the time being.
Throughout the original text of "Edward"'s article, it is full of confusing data, inconsistencies, "why not eat minced meat" criticism that does not understand China's reality, and flaws that distort the original meaning of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, as well as Han Chinese anti-birth control groups. Alarmist use of the population issue to create a malicious conflict between Han and ethnic minorities .
The words "destroy my China" in the title of this article indicate that the author is a Chinese (Han), but he gave himself a crooked name "Edward". He probably thinks that it is easier to deceive people with the name of a foreigner. The way the CCP bandits used the Swiss brick home "Wilson Edwards" to confuse the public is exactly the same. Considering that this article was produced earlier than the time when "Wilson Edwards" entered the world stage, I speculate that this time it is not only that "Truthfulness-Compassion-Forbearance" learns from the Communist bandit's falsification, but also the master of the Communist bandit in turn. I learned a trick from my apprentice.
Congratulations to the "Truthfulness? Compassion? Forbearance", your counterfeiting technology has reached the top of the world.
Like my work? Don't forget to support and clap, let me know that you are with me on the road of creation. Keep this enthusiasm together!
- Author
- More