Is it really good to go to the chase for decentralization?

After one or two years of cryptocurrencies, I have met all kinds of people on the Internet, and one of them is the decentralist believers. These people advocate that decentralization is the first priority of the blockchain, and basically they have It is about to become on-chain anarchism or on-chain Darwinism. Even if there are many RUG incidents on the chain, they insist that the project cannot be real-named, and users must fulfill their own responsibility for investigation. If they are really RUG, they can only blame their own luck. No more efforts. Even if the project on a chain is infinitely evil, it should not turn the guns of public opinion to blame the entire chain. It is a crazy cutting operation. Long live the blockchain co-prosperity and decentralization before the accident. , Investors please protect yourself and cherish yourself. However, when a large number of operation teams on a chain are out to do evil, there will still be users who are willing to spend a lot of time on the chain researching projects. Besides, it is extremely difficult to track down many anonymous people. If things go on like this The cost of user decision-making is too high, will anyone still be willing to use that chain?

I wonder if decentralists have thought about why human beings needed to choose this direction in the first place. When power was initially concentrated in the hands of a few people without checks and balances, it was easy to do evil. Therefore, in the system, many people chose to sacrifice part of it. Decision-making efficiency, and turn to the decentralization path of separation of power and checks and balances. However, many people may forget that decentralization is only a means rather than an end. The real purpose is to prevent the occurrence of malicious behavior, not decentralization. If When the effect is the cause, it is easy to fall into a logical black hole, forget the original intention at that time, and then counteract some solutions that may be contrary to decentralization in order to prevent evil in order to maintain the myth of decentralization. Falling into evil with the mythical banner of decentralization.

What's more, if each user needs to spend time again to investigate and research projects, first of all, the knowledge threshold is too high, such a scheme is difficult to coexist with the public, and it is inefficient for everyone to spend a lot of time repeatedly. Establishing supervision between modern financial systems The original intention is to reduce the cost of decision-making and trust, so that users can spend their extra time elsewhere, instead of fighting wits with potential fraudulent criminals who do not know whether they exist or not.

A lot of discussions with supervision, anonymity, and prevention of evil will likely become the main tone of the chain in the next few years. It needs to prove that it can truly enter the public eye and become a practical tool rather than a hotbed of hype and fraud.

https://t.me/wiwi995