Everyone makes mistakes, it's the attitude that counts

I originally thought that I recently wrote some articles about infringement and copyright, which should give everyone some understanding and vigilance. I didn’t expect that after you successfully let Youxiang Information remove the popular articles in Matt City, the plagiarism and rewriting of community activities broke out in the station. event.

In fact, similar articles have always existed, and there are also many users who will continue to enthusiastically report to the official. The normal situation is that the official will force the article down after the obvious pornographic advertisement is reported. Otherwise, the plagiarized article will be reported by the official. Leave a message at the bottom of the article to remind you to hide it, otherwise it will be forcibly removed from the shelf by the official.

However, why did this incident break out? The reason is that the article suspected of plagiarism and rewriting was reported by the user, but because it was an article participating in community activities, out of respect for the event organizer, the official first left a message under the event organizer's article to inform the situation, but the event organizer was confused and did not know How to be good, so I posted and tagged all the users who participated in the event to discuss together.

What I want to explain here is that everyone makes mistakes, but the attitude after making a mistake is very important . It is related to whether you can still get on the right path . Sometimes you make mistakes without knowing it. You should have given the opportunity to correct it. Here is an example that I encountered recently. At that time, I mentioned in this article that there were authors who translated articles in foreign languages. If they are not authorized, be careful about infringement. I did not name anyone in the article. However, the parties immediately left a message and responded as follows:

In fact, I was very surprised at the author's quick response. After all, I didn't name anyone, but the client was keenly aware that I was talking about him, and immediately came to ask if he really didn't have the authorization to translate it? Moreover, this article was also involved in another community activity at the beginning, and Pingping is a community activity in a similar situation. Why did the above four messages solve everything, and my interaction with the parties was not affected at all?

The key is attitude! ! !

Now @Cherryyoko Cherry Yoko is writing this article because she is annoyed by the question of attitude.

The students who were accused of plagiarism and rewriting immediately hid the two activity articles and disappeared completely and haven't come forward yet. (now renamed 5566)

The escort teacher accused others of not having the moral character of forgiveness, and even deleted the text of his own activities and then argued that he would be taken off the shelves just to apologize on behalf of the students. In fact, the teacher’s own article also plagiarized and rewritten. (now renamed Farewell)

Another person who switched to the teacher's account to reveal the flaws even said: "Since it is suspected, it will be taken off the shelves, and everything will follow!" (The account has not been changed yet)

I would like to ask, which one has the real apology?

Which one has truly apologized for his plagiarism?

Is it very different from the example I mentioned earlier?

Because of the completely different attitudes, the development of things has different results.

However, who is to blame?