The former "little computer poet" was sealed, which shows a problem

I was not particularly surprised to learn that Ctrip Liang Jianzhang, a former "little computer poet" and one of today's "national teachers of population", was blocked on Weibo. Even Yi Fuxian, a master forgery who almost won the Nobel Prize in Paste Statistics, will be blocked, not to mention Liang Jianzhang, who is only a disciple of the Nobel Prize winner. This gang of liars, following the dragon scales to flatter the Xiwen pigs, still have the opportunity to be high-end dog slaves in the name of experts and scholars to fool the Chinese people and deceive the world. .

But I didn't write this article to beat the drowning dog. After all, the thin and dead drowning dog is much fatter than the unknown little person like me. What's more, people are not thin and they have not really fallen into the water. The opportunity to blockade will cry bitterly, which will surely win them more support.

I wrote this article to analyze the effect of the population intimidation by these swindlers from the economic perspective on the ban on Liang Jianzhang, and how effective it is to encourage the birth of Xi Wen pigs by letting go of two and three children.

It is said that Liang Jianzhang was blocked on Weibo because he wrote an article (probably this article " Liang Jianzhang: Scientifically Demonstrate the Positive and Negative Impact of the Epidemic on Life expectancy as soon as possible ") saying that closing the city will shorten the life expectancy of the average person. The policy's Li Daokui believes that the closure of the city will increase the life expectancy of Chinese people.

While ostensibly talking about life expectancy, what they are really talking about is the indirect impact on life expectancy brought about by the direct impact of this policy on the economy:

According to rough estimates, only April and May will cause trillion-level losses. If the monthly loss is equivalent to 1% of the country's GDP, then according to Professor Li Daokui's estimate, a 1% consumption loss means a 10-day reduction in life expectancy.

It should be said that when Liang Jianzhang put forward his objections, he was quite tactical. He first followed Li Daokui's train of thought, and then suddenly turned upside down, as if he wanted to welcome and refuse.

Of course Liang Jianzhang knew who was standing behind Li Daokui, but for the money in his pocket, he had to tell the truth (just like on the population issue, he had to talk nonsense for the money in his pocket).

So how much economic damage will the recent policy of strict precautions cause?

The first is the service sector, which accounts for nearly 50% of GDP. Among them, the catering, tourism, and cultural industries have been devastated.

After all, it still comes down to the tourism industry that has a stake in Liang Jianzhang and Ctrip.

But he forgot that Xi Fanzhu did anything but "at the price (others paid)", in order to maintain the correctness of the zero-clearing policy, in order to maintain his glorious image of never admitting his mistakes, no matter how many mistakes he made, he didn't care. How many casualties and how much economic loss did the zero-clearing policy cause?

So he was blocked.

From this, it can be speculated that Liang Jianzhang, together with Ren Zeping and Yi Fuxian, used the economy to intimidate the Xi plague pigs, which did not have much effect at all. Xi Fanzhu doesn't care how much the population has an impact on the economy. What he cares about is whether the cannon fodder after the "great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation" in 2035 is enough. , is the real hit. As for the rest, the impact of population on the economy and the impact of population on "innovation" are nothing but smoke bombs.

Although I didn't read Liang Jianzhang's paper on "innovation", I would bet that in that seemingly scientific "paper", he must not discuss the following two issues:

First, in the era of bacon, although there are so many young people in China, why is the "innovation" so poor (except for the "innovation" in the aspect of raiding homes, criticizing and killing tricks)?

Second, when a group of illiterate and semi-literate people in their 60s and 70s monopolize the power of a country, how will these immortal bastards stifle the "innovative power" of young people?

I know that Liang Jianzhang's "thesis" certainly dare not touch on these two aspects. After removing the veil with the word "science" written on it, he is just a multinational capitalist and ass-licking slave who seeks personal economic benefits by flattering the pig.

I just saw on CDT that "A Donkey's Night Cruise" wrote an article "I hope you heal your scars, but don't forget the pain", for the 25 million Shanghainese who have never been locked down or unblocked.

But for Liang Jianzhang, who was a professor in Beijing in 1989 when he was gilded at Stanford and when Shanghai was "not locked down", the state apparatus of the Communist bandits never hurt them, and they didn't feel pain. So they certainly won't agree with the "last generation".

The leeks are the last generation. What do you do with these combine harvesters, which are made up of Communist bandits and internationally renowned prostitutes and prostitutes who sharpen their knives?

Wait for Liang Jianzhang to continue to encourage fertility. After all, only Weibo is blocked, and there are many other channels for farting.