Only the people are allowed to "accumulate virtue", and officials are not allowed to "accumulate virtue"

In the past few days, Quanzhou, Guangxi has revealed that the super-birth babies were "transferred" during the family planning era. At the beginning of the year, the Chinese media who kept silent about the incident in Fengxian County, Xuzhou and collectively issued "announcements" suddenly regained the long-awaited news. The "freedom of the press", constantly digging out the "Orphans of Shaw Brothers" and other events of the year, the new pot fried cold rice, the taste is particularly fragrant.

According to the clues combed by some articles (refer to " [404 Library] Xin'an Evening News | "Superbirth Adjustment" is not an isolated case, the reporter found that it has appeared in many places " " Laosky Finance | truth

07/06/2022 ”), this kind of thing is not only in Guangxi Quanzhou, from Hunan Longhui County, Dongkou County (all belonging to Shaoyang City), Hengyang Qidong County, to Guizhou Zhenyuan County, Guangdong Dianbai County, Sichuan Dazhou and Dongying, Shandong have introduced similar policies or have similar phenomena during the family planning era.

Among the above-mentioned areas, 3 belong to Hunan. Why is the concentration of welfare institutions robbing children and selling them to foreigners so high in Hunan Province? After reading the articles of various media, I found that they only analyzed the superficial reasons, and did not start with the cultural traditions of the local patriarchal clan to explore the deep-seated reasons for this phenomenon.

In fact, these reporters only need to look at the remarks of Yang Zhu, a graduate of the Peking University law department, who is also from Hunan, and it is not difficult to find the answer. As a master of law, Yang Zhu is one of the human rights fighters who once led the anti-birth control faction at home and abroad. He must be aware of the provisions of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights on combating human trafficking, right? However, in the eyes of Yang Zhu, a legal expert and human rights fighter, this clause of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights does not count at all (although he kept in mind the provisions of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights on the " right to reproductive freedom "), and he has threatened more than once to Parents legalize the sale of children and daughters, and also claim that human traffickers act as middlemen to sell children as "accumulated virtues." From Yang Zhu's remarks, it is not difficult to see how he and fellow villager Yi Fuxian love the Hunan patriarchal clan culture and society how they view child trafficking.

It is precisely because of this that the people in the welfare institutions in Hunan can so easily rob other people's children and sell them to adoptees in developed countries. According to the views and logic of Yang Zhu and others, these children left the original families that were either poor, irresponsible, or both, and left this country where ordinary people have no human rights under the dictatorship of the CCP, and were "sold" to Europe and the United States. Those adoptive parents who have been carefully selected, have financial strength, and are responsible, living in a country where human rights are guaranteed are "accumulated virtues" anyway. If the daughters find their relatives, those parents might be able to emigrate to Europe and the United States with their daughters in the future.

Therefore, in the article " Zhenyuan, Guizhou "Made" Abandoned Babies Sent Abroad for Profits , "Men's Metropolis Daily" had to admit this fact through the mouth of an aunt who had raised these children for the welfare institution:

I don't understand why Yang Zhu and the anti-birth control faction he led support private traffickers to buy and sell children, but oppose welfare institutions robbing and selling children. Is this the legend in the legend that only the people are allowed to "accumulate virtue" and the officials are not allowed to "accumulate virtue"? Or, are they actually jealous of the children who escaped from the hell on earth because of being "accumulated" by the officials?

It is a pity that various media and self-media writers refuse to face up to and reflect on the anti-human rights of Yang Zhu and his followers (perhaps they themselves are Yang Zhu's followers?) Thought and refusal to recognize such entrenched feudal remnants in the people are the "chassis" on which the government can do evil with equanimity.

Of course, the Family Planning Commission is a bastard, aren't Yang Zhuzhu and his supporters who fight against human rights in the name of human rights?

Not only Yang Zhuzhu and his followers have anti-human rights thoughts, but also from various media and self-media articles, many families whose children were robbed also have such thoughts. Many of those families have overbirthed or are preparing to overbirth because of son preference. Although the reporters beat their chests and feet for their separation, these families don't care much about the "separation of flesh and blood".

In fact, in many cases disclosed by the media, those parents took the initiative to "separate" from their daughters long before the Family Planning Commission and the welfare institute came to them:

In the "Shaw Brothers Orphans" incident, Yang Libing and his wife went out to work after "nurturing their daughter until she was half a year old". Under normal circumstances, a half-year-old child has not been weaned. If the parents really loved and cherished their daughter, would they have taken the initiative to "separate" from their daughter so early?

After his daughter was taken away, Yang Libing "guessed" the reason why the child was taken away, which seemed reasonable, but he probably didn't tell the truth. The real reason is likely to be: after giving birth to the eldest daughter, the couple is very likely to want to have another son, so the daughter is half a year old and has not yet been registered . When the Family Planning Commission came to inquire about the source of the baby girl, Yang Libing's parents probably lied to the Family Planning Commission that this was an adopted child out of the same consideration, which led to the baby girl being taken away.

Of course, writing out the real reason is not conducive to highlighting the central idea of the article and the heinous and heinous crimes of the Family Planning Commission. Therefore, the parties and reporters spared no effort to cover up this reason.

In the case of Zhenyuan, Guizhou, there is also a situation in which he took the initiative to "separate" from his daughter because he preferred sons to daughters and wanted to have a son:

This time, the baby girl was just one month old! If Li Zeji had the slightest pity for his daughter, would he have left such a small baby to go out to work? If he had the slightest pity for his wife, would he take his wife out to work just a month after she gave birth? There are still 98 days of maternity leave given by the Communist government! Is this Li Zeji even worse than the evil Communist government?

Of course, the Family Planning Commission is an asshole, aren't these patriarchal fathers assholes?

As a supporter of the Chinese rural human rights fighter Yang Zhu, even the "Men's Metropolis Daily" finally couldn't stand what those parents did:

Years later, when the children adopted by the Americans searched for their relatives and found their biological parents, what they gained was not the affection of their parents, but indifference:

If the fate of those children is really as tragic as the authors of these articles exaggerate, then such tragedies are not just made by the Family Planning Commission and the welfare institution, but the deeply rooted anti-human rights ideology among Yang Zhizhu and his followers. , The deep-rooted patriarchal ideology in Hunan, Guizhou, Guangxi and other provinces was created together with those government-related personnel from the private sector.

Just digging out the backbone of the Family Planning Commission and the Welfare Institute, without digging out the root of the poison that is deeply rooted in the minds of Yang Zhuzhu and his supporters, as well as the parents who prefer sons to daughters, will not be enough to completely eradicate the evil of official and private sale of children.

But many media and we-media authors are reluctant to dig deep into this poisonous root. Maybe they just want to take back the right to buy and sell people's "virtue accumulation" that has been manipulated by the patriarchal clan society for thousands of years from the relevant government departments. Just as they denounce family planning, they are simply taking back from the government the privilege of controlling women's wombs for thousands of years in patriarchal clan societies.