If clapping hands can only express support indirectly, is it tasteless to praise citizens?

As the saying goes, beating is scolding is love. Time is precious, if you are still complaining, you are still wasting time caring about this stuff.

The rules of the game have changed since Appreciate Citizens Upgrade 3.0. Instead of accepting credit card fiat payments, delegate a minimum of 5000 likes to the legendary public node. The commission rate of the public node is 100%, which means that to become an admiring citizen 3.0, you have to lose at least 5000 LIKE commission income to exchange for the green circle avatar. And the income entrusted to the public node seems to be used as your monthly reward fee, and it is sent to your favorite author through the clapping button.

After the 3.0 version of the green circle was upgraded, I saw some complaints and suggestions, so I also went to join in the fun and commissioned to experience it myself. The result of the experience is this:

I clapped the same hands, but there seems to be a disparity in what the authors I support get paid. . . . . .

Everyone who plays matters knows that the clap button can be clapped 5 times to show readers' support for the author to varying degrees. If my level of support for an author is not very strong, I can choose to rate 1, rate 2, rate 3, rate 4... Since I choose rate 5, it means that my level of support for the author is the same; however, the author receives from me rate 5 The income is not the same ...

It is said that the most logical slot of like clap is the metaphysics of clap for daily like distribution.

I'm not the only one who complains about metaphysics like this. The slot is nothing more than that, fortunately, 110 clapping hands are exchanged for 2.3 coins...

For such metaphysics, the public answer is nothing more than:

• It's not admiring citizens who applaud you. Ordinary users' applause has a lower weight when allocating daily creation funds;
• Those who applaud you are old users who often applaud you, and the articles are not widely spread;
• You don't get a super like every 12 hours from the Appreciated Citizen.

The above metaphysics distribution of 2.3 coins comes from the algorithm logic of the daily creation fund, and the public accepts the results of this metaphysics with a Buddhist attitude: clapping is spiritual encouragement, and the like in exchange for clapping is material encouragement. It is very happy to have readers sincerely clap their hands, don't make it so vulgar for the distribution of a few coins...

As for the allocation of the daily creation fund algorithm, there is metaphysics. Forget it, after all, it is not my money; but the hands I patted out are real and cannot be mysterious. If the hands I clapped are all assigned by metaphysics, why should I clap seriously? ? ! !

Since there is Citizen of Appreciation 3.0, there is Citizen of Appreciation 2.0 and 1.0. The logic of 3.0 now seems to be close to the previous 1.0, and they all directly express a little support to the author when they clap their hands.

In an era of admiring Citizens 1.0 and 2.0, I did the 2.0 thing. To be honest, the 2.0 set doesn't seem to be very popular. Version 2.0 appreciates that citizens spend 5 USD per month to subscribe to a certain user, and 5 USD is directly exchanged for LIKE to vote for subscribers every month. Clap no longer directly invests coins to the author, but 2.0 user Clap can still help the author in the daily creation fund allocation gain weight...

People don't like 2.0 because they are afraid that the author they ordered will run away one day, and they will lose money if they don't come out and write more.

And I have always been relatively novel in logic, and have engaged in 2.0, which the general public is not very fond of. My subscription target in the 2.0 era is the grandfather of Matters, a well-known user volunteer. As for why this is done, there are 5 reasons:

1. Grandpa Volunteer is an active user of Matters and has been online for a long time. Even if he does not post, he still manages the fireplace. Although there is still the possibility that grandpa will run away one day, the risk probability is small.
2. The language style of the volunteer grandpa is very, very, very suitable for my taste, and I like that set of language routes.
3. The grandfather of the volunteers once posted a call to "Save the Old, Disabled and Poor" to trick everyone into subscribing to him. I subscribed to this sentence: If you want money, just say it. I like this attitude, and I will support it decisively.
4. After becoming Appreciative Citizen 2.0, clapping can allow authors to gain more weight. It is said that there is a 40-fold difference in applauding citizens and ordinary users. Now that I have made it, I have to make money from it; if the hand I shoot makes the author get very little profit, then am I not doing my work for nothing? Although I appreciate that I don’t know the specific weight distribution algorithm of citizens, I will try to comfort myself.
5. After becoming a 2.0 appreciative citizen, all 5 USD per month will be voted for the volunteer grandpa, so I don't have to worry about my handicap - this is an important reason why I subscribed to 2.0 instead of 1.0 - I am a layman, and I come to matter with Semi-entertainment mentality. Since it is a semi-entertainment mentality, sometimes it will be dizzy and wrong. If you order 1.0 and you shoot it wrong, it will be sold in real gold and silver.

Another well-known user of Matters, Mummy Tingting, once called on everyone not to shoot indiscriminately, but to shoot valuable, meaningful and meaningful articles. Let those who write seriously receive fair encouragement and benefits, and Matters will not be overwhelmed by hydrology. I admire the professional attitude of the shooter Mommy Tingting. I can't be so serious. I can shoot hydrology with my hands, so the 1.0 set is not suitable for a water-filled reader like me...

Although 5 yuan is not much, it was also debited from my credit card. Since it is my own money, I have autonomy. Whether it's 5 yuan or 50, I have to let the money I spend go to the object I want to spend, instead of the hand that is shot like a lucky draw.

After seeing the material encouragement for the author of the 3.0 set of 5, such as metaphysical lottery, I have more admiration for the shooter Mummy Tingting: the like that is shot now is like a lucky lottery, I'm really sorry for your seriousness. There have been many debates over the income issue because of the clapping issue? ? ! ! When we sincerely clapped our hands to encourage the author, the author was encouraged by metaphysical material, discussing the issue of clapping, which is really a bit too serious.

To sum up, come to Matters and have fun, don't take it too seriously.

As the author, if you want to pursue spiritual encouragement, it is affirmative to have clapping hands. As for how many likes you get by clapping your hands, it’s metaphysics, and it’s good to keep a Buddhist mentality and complain occasionally; as for how much material encouragement the clapping hands have brought to the author, it’s better to treat it as a lottery game.

If there are so many articles of conscience, if you really want to support it, it is most practical to put coins directly.

By the way, if you click the "support the author" button at the bottom of the article, it's the most direct way to put a coin, then how much meaning does "turning praise into appreciation" of the clapping button?

For my request to spend every cent of the money, I must be clear and clear. In the era of 3.0, where 2.0 is gone forever, it is better to entrust 5000 LIKE to the 0 commission verifier, and then from 0 commission to that Earned interest coin support is transparent and direct to my favorite authors.

Since entrusting 5000 LIKE to change the green circle avatar for the public node is unclear to the author, is there any other meaning to the green circle avatar? After much deliberation, it is the grandfather's famous quote that sums it up most eloquently:

At this time, you post another article saying that you have joined the Appreciation Citizen, and you are guaranteed to make a bunch of new friends.

——Grandpa Volunteer | <Pseudo-famous columnist> Grandpa Volunteer Chat: Secret Skills for Newcomers in Matt City~~ The savior of social hardships

Therefore, the green circle is still for users to make friends with popularity. As for turning praise into appreciation, don't take it too seriously.