sp artist recommendation | Lee Warner

Warning: This article deals with the fetish of spank (spanking).

[The garden owner's broken thoughts]

Today, I finally completed the proofreading of the ten chapters of "Brother's Story", and organized the scattered thoughts into another piece of thought. Various specific details in the proofreading process have also formed a proofreading note. Launch some of the sections that you have planned in your mind as soon as possible, so that you can write directly under the relevant sections when you have inspiration in the future.

The "sp artist recommendation" section plans to recommend outstanding artists in the sp field from time to time (the final interpretation of the excellent standards belongs to the owner of the garden :) ). The artist's works are only displayed with those related to the textual meaning, which is intended to introduce rather than criticize the exhibition. For the paintings that arouse the garden owner's thinking or make the garden owner fall in love, a separate section will be opened and a special article will be shared. In the early stage of this edition, we will mainly introduce sp painters who paint in various ways, and may introduce sp artists in other categories and even related persons in a broader sense in the future.

The first artist featured in this section is Lee Warner, the /f field sp painter who has won the favor of the owner for a long time.

Under the entry of Lee Warner on the Spanking Art website, a colleague named "Les647" is quoted as saying about Warner:

Congrats to Lee Warner, the highest compliment goes to Lee Warner: his sp art is some of the best I've seen in my years of collecting. He is the best gift the sp community can have.

In the long time inside the wall, Lee Warner has a place in my heart. In a jungle of sexual, perfunctory, or horrific sp images, his paintings are a rare fountain of water that I can find. At that time, all his works that I came into contact with were his colorful paintings, and I didn’t know how to know the names of the creators of these paintings. I also published Lee Warner’s hand-painted photo album on a certain website, and selected some of my favorite paintings to upload. , but the album has since disappeared from the site's censorship or self-censorship. The fate of sp works involving children is another topic that has been displaced from country to country, and borderline sexualists' claims that "the creative process did not harm any child" are not always heeded, and are often rather weak.

Closer to home, Lee Warner is a sp painter in the /f field. In his paintings, he will use a symbol that superimposes "L" on "W" to indicate the creator of the work. He started sharing his paintings on thehandprints.com in February 2006, and on November 14, 2007, he announced on the site's forum that he would stop or at least temporarily stop creating sp paintings, as each painting would take him 15-20 hours time, and he wanted to focus on other things.

Lee Warner's paintings (both in black and white and in color) are often based on other reference materials. The reference materials he uses are paintings, illustrations, rendering art, but more often photographs or parts from photographs. The reference photos he used included legal sp photos of adult models and non-sp scenes of children's photos or paintings. He uses Photoshop to resize and scale these photos to children, with minor modifications and overlays of children's faces, sometimes using photo composites to add images of girls, adults, furniture, clothes, hairbrushes, etc. On this basis, he uses "creative tracing" to create paintings from reference materials made according to the above methods. (Part of the introduction to Warner in this article comes from the Spanking Art website. For more introduction to Warner's painting technology, especially creative tracing, please refer to https://m.spankingart.org/wiki/Lee_Warner , and make good use of the Related Links) Warner's paintings created in this way highlight the "sketchy" style of his artwork, providing the viewer with a relatively realistic perspective that can be distinguished from the immediate reality of photographs. open.

A colleague of Spanking Art website editor Lee Warner's entry summarized Warner's creative theme and features as follows:

His intention was to provide a wide variety of images for the /f realm, catering to a wide variety of different tastes - although usually only depicting scenes that would be found in most ordinary homes. He usually leaves some ambiguity, allowing the viewer to fully use his imagination.

According to the link statistics collected by Spanking Art, we can see a total of 125 paintings by Lee Warner, including 62 black and white paintings and 63 color paintings. Of these 125 paintings, Warner does "provide a wide variety of images for the /f field" in several senses:

In Warner's gallery No. 7 on the handprints website ( http://thehandprints.com/hpDrawings138.html ), (supposedly) Warner makes a scene distinction for his paintings: "before", "during" and "after" ”, corresponding to various scenes before, during and after the girl was spanked. Among them, "before" includes education, preparation, fear, etc.; "period" includes sp in different perspectives and scenarios; "after" includes criticism, comfort, cold compress, and no remorse.

This distinction does reflect Warner's ambition to "variety", because the scenes outside the sp "period", that is, before and after, are often more storytelling and emotional, which is why they often bring viewers Greater imagination. Among them, the creation of many /f paintings ( Small popular science: /f can be used to refer to only underage girls who are punished in the picture, in addition to the sp who refers to the punished as a minor female, according to the usual method of popular science. , and the works without the punisher, the picture below is an example. /f The works generally show the scenes of girls preparing to be punished, and reflecting on them after being punished. ), as shown in the picture below in Gallery No. 7, it also reflects Warner’s work in sp Detailed and rich experience and imagination in the field.

And that's just the tip of the iceberg of Warner's commitment to "variety." In addition to this distinction made by Warner himself, the scenes and postures during the sp "period", the identity, gender, number, tools used, the clothes of the punished, and the sp plot revealed by the screen, etc. Compared to the sp painter who repeats certain formulas over and over again, Warner is completely "variety".

Of course, like the evaluation on Spanking Art, Warner "usually just described scenes that can be seen in most ordinary families", and in this sense, it seems that he did not achieve "a wide variety" beyond this scene. (Although Warner also has very few paintings of school scenes). But probably because my heart is right in the sp in the family scene, and in this scene, I expect and embrace the unevenness, so I agree with the "variety" of Warner's paintings.

However, with the increase in the number of sp paintings I read, I gradually changed from the ecstasy of finding painters that fit my heart's field and scene to being able to rationally strip out some of the elements in Warner's paintings that made me less excited. I'm not going to talk about likes and dislikes about specific tools, settings, plots, etc., but generally about my turn-offs that exist in Warner's paintings.

The first is the unnatural character expressions, which may be related to the way Warner draws, or Warner's own understanding of sp. I found that in Warner's paintings, whether it is the punisher or the punished, the expressions often fail to give me a clue. An appropriate feeling. In general, the expression of the punisher is either too ferocious, or too indifferent, or it is not serious enough in the punishment scene, or even at odds with the identity of the parent; and the expression of the punished is often panic and pain. To the point of being out of balance, or it seems too vicissitudes of life, it can't even be said that there is anything wrong, but it just feels unnatural.

Secondly, this point may also shape the first point, and it is more definitely related to the way Warner paints, that is, his reference materials are mostly adjusted from adult sp photos - his paintings often contain family discipline sp. Unnecessary nudity and more implicitly erotic connotations, which strikes me as quite contradictory. For example, this one in Gallery No. 7, in my opinion, has an excellent subject matter, but because of the unnecessary nudity, the warmth after the punishment that should have been quite deep has become a bit strange. And it seems that this piece also suffers from the first problem mentioned above - the expression of the punisher's "father" does not make me feel much the meaning of fatherly love.

Warner once wrote on the handprints website: "In some of my pictures, I do hope to provoke some kind of unconscious antipathy mixed in with the obsession." Arguably, he did exactly that.

Although I only came into contact with Warner's color works at first, but later on, I felt more and more that his black and white works painted more scenes that fit my heart, more like children using corporal punishment as an educational method, Discipline for mistakes in a loving and loving family. In the future, I may translate an article, which is about the difference between the practice and expression of works in the SP circle and real life. Finally, put a few black and white works of Warner for readers.