Why I'm Talking About Pink - And Responsibility For The Pandemic

This article is just a rant, not a discussion of academic theory. It is full of personal aggression and prejudice. Please note

Some things have always been hoped to be written when they think better, but sometimes they feel too common sense. Now, do some things still need to be discussed, but I have witnessed the "pink" refresh the lower limit again and again, and see When @Lusheng discussed the tragic situation in the comment area after the epidemic responsibility, I still want to share my understanding in a more straightforward way.

1. The reason why I hate pink: I have a phobia of fools

Having communicated with them more, I realized that Pink's position, knowledge and conscience cannot coexist . Among them, Pink's position is a statist stance, knowledge represents information, knowledge and common sense possessed by oneself, and conscience uses knowledge rationally. Attitude, of course, similar judgments often say that there are two of the three. Many times we find that pink only has a position and only a position. This is very reflected in the Li Wenliang controversy. The legal opinion of the Chinese Supreme Court on the Li Wenliang case was unexpectedly rejected. They think it is an act of flattering public opinion, so it is invalid, but even if the most basic one has a little respect for China's highest legal authority, if you read the article, you will be persuaded by the reasoning in it, if the reader has basic reason, conscience and thinking ability .

So we can see that they are constantly fighting, and they are constantly showing their ignorance and fearlessness to the world. What is the essence of these battles on Weibo, Twitter and even on matter? Attack others with unreasonableness, and please yourself with orgasm. Compared to physical masturbation, mental masturbation may be more able to make them orgasm . We know that communicating with others requires persuasiveness, solid arguments, solid logic, and a good argumentation process, and which of these exchanges with Pink exist, and those exist in those well-known battles? The essence of Pink's expedition at the beginning of its popularity in the mainland and even the earlier conquest of the Emperor Bar is to rely on the number of people and efforts, use meaningless things to swipe the screen, throw garbage in other people's homes, and put small advertisements on other people's doors. , other than leaving the impression of a jerk, what positive effect will it have on relationships with others ?

This kind of meaningless communication is not uncommon in the current Chinese public opinion field. Back then , the author was in the mixed cross talk circle on Zhihu. The atmosphere of preaching, but this model is still much more primitive compared to the later colonial period of the rice circle, and quarrels also have to be dry goods. Like the establishment of the party, the casual compilation of historical materials has been exposed more, and it has been abandoned by public opinion. And what about the rice circle colonization? As cross talk has become a part of the contemporary entertainment industry, cross talk actors have become idols, and cross talk actors are maintained like Korean entertainment stars. What is the communication mode they bring? It's unilateral propaganda and insistence on their own words. Even if they don't fully believe what they say, they still go to "criticism". The basis of communication is false. For them, they are just completing their own propaganda tasks. Instead of exchanging opinions, they try to hide their truth. All public feelings are performances. They are actors who work harder than actors on stage. Actors only live for half an hour, and they perform all the time. Of course, they also have backstage, We need to vent our truth, so we can see that there is an answer that no one likes in the marginal question of Zhihu, and the comment area of the answer includes the wonder of tens of thousands of replies . When they had the right to speak and controlled the discussion in the Zhihu cross talk circle through a series of organizations, I quit Zhihu, because the discussion was meaningless at this time.

Pink is a kind of fandom creature to some extent. It is nothing more than an idol of a certain country. Their faces are filled with the ignorance and fearlessness of the fandom. They are self-centered, can't communicate and refuse to communicate. A civilized way of describing them is, If zombies rule the world, they must be able to live well, because zombies eat brains .

I saw a sentence before, very insightful, intellectuals can only reason . Why is it enjoyable to read, because reading can be heard every day, can satisfy one's curiosity about the unknown in the world, can be persuaded by the author's insight and the author's exquisite arguments, reading Weber, no matter how boring the religious ethics is, the iron cage The more profound the impact, it is the insight into human society, the reading experience and research, the high-quality works of famous masters, this is how things are broken and smashed, this is how things are, what is there to dispute about this. Why it is pleasant to communicate with people who have enough accumulation, because regardless of the similarities and differences of views, communication itself is a good and wonderful experience, the process of sharing oneself is the process of refining one's own cognition, and the process of listening to others is the process of making up for one's own ignorance , differences in understanding can also be found in the discussion to improve understanding.

The characteristic of pink is that it is unreasonable or unreasonable. It is not enough to scold the United States and capitalism, and to come up with some arguments with worrying IQ. It will be very embarrassing to criticize capitalism, because criticizing capitalism is the foundation of sociology, and criticizing socialism is the result of the localization of sociology . Our localization is very general, but who has not learned to criticize capitalism.

2. Analysis of Responsibility for the Epidemic: Do I Need to Discuss?

Many things are clear enough by now, if you don't play stupid, do you need to waste your words? In this section, the author will discuss two issues, one is the basic Covid-19 liability issue, and the other is the criticism of intellectuals. Both have been discussed on Matters, and they are still controversial in the Chinese public opinion circle.

The former author has already given a very insightful analysis in the article "Several Critical Investigations on the Analysis of the New Crown of European Thinkers". The post-colonial perspective is a very inexplicable voice, a kind that caters to nationalist sentiments. And ignore the view of the basic status quo of the world, and this pattern is also reflected in many pink voices.

The most typical one is the ignorance theory based on prejudice, that is, European and American countries ignored the virus attack in China because of their arrogance and missed the time of epidemic prevention, and China warned the world. Such words ignore the most basic reality, that is, the virus has had a huge impact on countries with different levels of development around the world, not only in European and American countries, but also in the vast majority of developing countries. Is there a problem, especially with the prolonged outbreak in South Korea and even Europe.

They understand the delay in the Chinese government's response with the utmost tolerance but do not apply it in the analysis and discussion of other countries. Globalization is accompanied by the globalization of risks. At present, there is no mode in which an infectious disease breaks out in a certain corner of the world, and all other countries enter a state of emergency. A crisis in a distant place cannot bring us a sense of crisis, although globalization makes the crisis be pulled in. , the connection of the world also makes the six-degree division closer to a reality, and everyone's cognition is sluggish. Ebola broke out in Africa, how many Chinese people know about the virus's attack on Africa, the outbreak of mers in South Korea a few years ago, when the virus hit our neighbors, how many Chinese people were not indifferent to the so-called outbreak of the epidemic in South Korea, and they even thought about the pink itself. If you make fun of the flu season in the United States, you don't realize that the flu in the United States will spread to the world with internationalization, including China, which is also experiencing flu season.

Whether it is to analyze the responsibility of the new crown or other, we should analyze it in a real world , considering that the imperfection of this world is universal, and some delays are unavoidable in the current health system and management system, rather than with the current health system and management system. compared to a presumed perfect prophetic government.

Therefore, in the process of responding to the new crown epidemic, many countries have taken measures that are correct to a certain extent but ineffective . For example, China has built two hospitals according to the sars model, and built two hospitals. The needs of the patients, the government’s goal is to achieve the square cabin, some governments have adopted the entry supervision measures of airport body temperature in the face of the epidemic in China, and now we know whether the new crown has symptoms, and the incubation period or even the incubation period may be infectious before the outbreak. It is the strongest. Such measures are routine responses to infectious diseases. In practice, importation cannot be effectively avoided, but is the government responsible for taking such measures? Of course, we can point out that there are, in fact, rational systems. The irrationality of modern rationality or bureaucracy cannot be truly rational in dealing with crises, rather than the responsibility of a particular country. Others can be expected to be slow. There is a time lag between a community outbreak in an area and the discovery by the public health system. Patients with mild symptoms may not go to the hospital, and it is difficult to find a new crown from a group of influenza patients when they go to the hospital. The implementation of policies needs to be based on evidence , without the large-scale outbreak in China, it is difficult for other countries to impose severe traffic restrictions, and countries forcefully put China's traffic and travel restrictions until the end of January, which has also been criticized as an over-response, but Before this, many patients have moved around the world, even in China, which is an exception model. Entry restrictions are gradually increased with the world epidemic. Although China has a higher degree of freedom than before in the state of emergency, it is still possible to Discover imported cases brought about by the unavoidable lag in decision-making, whether from Europe, America, Africa or Russia, and such a lag is also unavoidably reflected in the transition from anti-import to anti-local, and the need for anti-local is very high Costs require more evidence. If there is no local outbreak, can we enter a state of emergency at will, and when a local outbreak occurs, it will naturally lead to accusations. These lags will exacerbate the outbreak, but are inevitable and should not be the responsibility of a particular country.

Some problems are caused by the country's special governance model and system . For example, in Europe, as pointed out by many critics, the reduction of investment in the medical system brought about by neoliberalism has made medical redundancy insufficient, and it usually responds to aging. It has been faltering, and it is even more incapable of coping when faced with a crisis. For example, in China, the high cost of one-size-fits-all is a phenomenon of imperial logic. The public health system is political from the top down, and the concealment of information brought about is ineffective. , wasting the precious time between the end of December and the end of January when the epidemic was clearly discovered. According to Zhong Nanshan's calculations on the scale of the epidemic and the response time, we have sufficient reasons to suspect that if we took active and effective measures to deal with infectious diseases in early January, Whether the virus can leave Wuhan is a matter of debate. And these are clearly the responsibility of the state.

Some problems are obvious gains and derelictions of duty under the existing system, which cannot be explained by bureaucracy. For example, the mistakes of CDC testing reagents in the United States, some hospitals in China have shown very different responses under the same institutional environment. measures and the control of nosocomial infection, which are also the responsibility of the state in a broad sense.

Therefore, the new crown is a risk of globalization. When the virus leaves Wuhan and goes to the world, the delay of other countries, whether it is based on the delay of the rational system or the irrational delay (for example, whether the response to the epidemic in Europe is too slow, compared to In terms of the normal decision-making system), the international spread of the new crown is unavoidable, and the fish that slip through the net before the problem is pointed out or even deal with will always remain unblocked in various countries around the world, and A country that is not blocked is a new dandelion. Before it becomes a problem in its own country, it will sow its seeds to other places. If Europe and the United States are doing well, they should take stronger measures earlier. At most, they will reduce the epidemic situation in their own countries, while China Only then can it be possible to avoid international spread. As soon as international spread begins, all countries, including Europe and the United States, will have only big and small domestic epidemics, not with or without .

Finally, let’s discuss some criticism of intellectuals. Pink is criticizing the double standard of intellectuals, but intellectuals are no longer encyclopedias in the classical sense, but professional intellectuals. Based on the facts they know, their professional speeches are a kind of A common phenomenon , although this phenomenon has been repeatedly criticized, but living in one's own country and knowing more about what is happening in this country, the criticism will be more real and well-founded. A country has a country's intellectuals, who give advice based on what they understand. There is nothing wrong with making some criticisms from the interested society, and it is even more pointless to make hasty criticisms about things that you don’t know enough about. People with four dimensions will be embarrassed to say the wrong thing. Maybe pink won’t, based on Your own imagination speaks out as the truth, and the question of its fact will also attack the position of the doubter.