After reading Output's highest learning method

Although I have a lot of thoughts in my heart, I try to write it briefly

Output is a very important process. If there is only input and no output, it is actually useless.

The output is like doing exercise, helping metabolism and changing the mind

multiple outputs

I found that people need to output more, not just input. The author said that as soon as he has an idea, he will write a plan, and there are at least 20 plans on the computer.

This surprised me. Reflect on his own output and not as much as him.

He also kept typing, reading 20 books a month...

Feedback

This argument is not the first time I have seen it, but I have seen it in "deliberate practice", "deep work".

Seeing this theory again reminds me to give feedback on my works. A good teacher's opinion is a treasure. Remember he had a chapter saying, does constant input > output make it grow and become better? The answer is wrong, because you don't improve your mistakes, you just keep making the same mistakes, which I totally agree with.

The output does not have to be perfect, it will be modified later

There is a theory that is very indecisive. Generally, the perfect idea is like this. When writing a work, it will have a score of 80-100, so it has been unable to write (by myself). The way he wrote the book was 30 points at first, and the most important thing was to finish it quickly. Then modify it to 50 points, 80 points, 100 points

This gave me a big inspiration for writing the script

Summarize

I need to do more output, so write this after reading