Fang Fengmei's criticism of the family planning policy is "why not eat minced meat"-style delirium

(This article is based on my comments after the article " China's Xinjiang Policy: It is said that it is for fertility regulation, but it is true that it is necessary to strengthen control ". Thanks to "Lei Chen Rita" for providing the translation of Fang Wen and The original website of Fangwen English .)

Although Fang Fengmei may think that she is not as low as Yi Fuxian, the master of counterfeiting, she and his logic are equally shabby, and she and he both like to play with numbers.

First look at Fang Fengmei's logic:

Because the forced sterilization of the Uyghurs by the CCP in Xinjiang was to “maintain power,” she could infer that the CCP’s implementation of the family planning policy throughout the country was also to “maintain power.”

It's like, when she sees that someone kills for money, she infers that everyone kills for money. What kind of diabolical logic is this? Don't people kill people for other reasons?

Fang Fengmei's comparison of China's family planning policy with the Nazi genocide is simply framed. Although the communist bandits are evil, as far as I know, the communist bandit government has never thrown family members and children of people who violated the family planning policy into concentration camps or gas chambers to kill them.

Violations of human rights can range from serious to serious, just as crimes can also range from serious to serious. Because minor crimes and serious crimes are all crimes, people who commit minor crimes are sentenced to death indiscriminately like those who commit serious crimes. This is actually the logical basis for Fang Fengmei's comparison of the family planning policy with the Nazi genocide.

Because the Nazi genocide was based on eugenics, Fang Fengmei believed that eugenics was "another ugly word" and therefore useless, and this logic was bizarre enough.

It's like, because the Nazis ate bread, they thought it was "ugly" and banned people from eating bread. What kind of idiot came to such absurd conclusions?

In order to reduce the incidence of fetal defects (such as Down syndrome), many countries have adopted various medical interventions (including induced abortion and abortion), which are actually based on eugenics. Fang Fengmei and her colleagues The anti-birth control group like Yi Fuxian, the master of counterfeiting, should also beat this stick to death?

Fang Fengmei blames China's sex ratio imbalance on the one-child policy, which is downright selective blindness, because China's situation where there are more males than females existed long before the one-child policy appeared. The practice of drowning or torture of female infants and girls has existed in this country for hundreds of thousands of years before patriarchal parents killed female fetuses. This is a chronic disease caused by the idea that men are superior to women, and at best the one-child policy has magnified this chronic disease to a very limited extent .

As for the phenomenon of "the scarcity of women in rural China has led to a surge in sexual slavery and human trafficking", she suggested Fang Fengmei to visit her ancestral home in Fujian. Long before the implementation of the one-child policy, Fujian had a long-standing bad habit of selling and raising child brides . Only after the implementation of the family planning policy did it gradually change : "1980 may be called a watershed. Since then, not only have the number of child brides plummeted, but they also have the freedom to marry to some extent."

Although the family planning policy is at best a scapegoat for the problem of gender ratio imbalance, Fang Fengmei hates this scapegoat to the core, and she ignores the culprit that causes the gender ratio imbalance - the idea that men are superior to women. Is Fang Fengmei's selective blindness just because of her ignorance? Or is Fang Fengmei just defending the culprit who has killed generations of Chinese girls for thousands of years, or perhaps she truly loves that culprit?

Fang Wen mentioned:

In 2014, The Economist listed the one-child policy as one of the most important strategies for slowing global warming -- more effective than protecting Brazil's rainforest -- although the magazine admitted it was a "deception" because China The government did not take climate protection into account when formulating the policy.

Regardless of whether the Communist Party has taken into account the mitigation of global warming when formulating the one-child policy, this policy actually has the effect of slowing down global warming.

It's like when a person drinks water with only the feeling of thirst in his head and doesn't consider the various benefits of drinking water, that doesn't mean that the other benefits of drinking water are "deceptive" .

Fang Fengmei's use of "Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea and Thailand" to prove that "we can curb population growth without agreeing to the one-child policy" is also absurd, because those countries have a population size that is not an order of magnitude from China's .

This is like, a person who is 50% overweight may be able to lose weight through exercise; but a person who is 10 times overweight and can hardly exercise normally, you let him lose weight through exercise, is it possible?

Moreover, China implemented family planning shortly after the Cultural Revolution, when the economy and ecology were on the verge of collapse, which is very different from the countries mentioned by Fang Fengmei.

Without considering the size of China's population, without considering China's actual economic, social, political and ecological background at that time, it is wrong to infer the policies of several decades ago based on the current level of economic and technological development . Theory” is actually just a modern version of the delirium of “why not eat minced meat” .

Let's take a look at Fang Fengmei's ridiculous trick with data: compare the number of bachelors in China with the population of Australia, but keep silent about China's huge population. Can you ask Fang Fengmei to compare the population and territorial area of China with the population and territorial area of Australia:

Including some disputed territories, China's territory is said to be only 9.6 million square kilometers, but its population exceeds 1.4 billion; while Australia's territory is as high as 7.69 million square kilometers, accounting for more than 80% of China's territory, but what about Australia's population? , but only less than 26 million, less than 2% of China's. Regardless of China's huge population base, regardless of the gap between 80% and 2%, but comparing China's bachelor population with Australia's total population, one can't see Mount Tai's tricks. This is to treat readers as fools.

Although Fang Fengmei's criticism of the family planning policy is full of loopholes, I do not believe that the CCP's forced sterilization or sterilization of Uyghurs is justified. There is one thing Fang Fengmei may have forgotten, or she just pretends not to know: the CCP’s forced sterilization or sterilization of Uyghurs actually follows the ideas of the Han nationalist anti-birth control group . The reason this group opposes family planning is that they are worried that the family planning policy will lead to the population of "minorities" exceeding the Han population, making the Han people at a disadvantage in controlling China's power and competing for resources with the "minority". Perhaps it is no coincidence that the Han Chinese anti-birth control group, like Fang Fengmei, believes that the family planning policy is "genocide", especially the "genocide" against the Han people - although the Chinese people have not only not been exterminated after the implementation of family planning, but the population Also added hundreds of millions.

Fang Fengmei thought that the abolition of family planning and the one-child policy would allow Chinese and Uyghurs to gain human rights. Therefore, like other anti-birth control groups, she repeatedly lied, played with data, and played with logic. The results of it? Hehe, she and her anti-birth control comrades are just being used and played by the CCP bandits with ambitions and evil intentions.

The abolition of family planning will not bring much improvement to the human rights of the Chinese or Uyghurs. As long as the total population remains large, and as long as the contradiction between people and resources persists for a long time, the suppression, exclusion and even persecution of the Uyghur and other ethnic minorities by the Han regime will be impossible. Will persist for a long time, if not manifested in forced sterilization or sterilization, but in other, more brutal ways .

On a national scale, the same conclusion holds: as long as the fundamental problems of male superiority and a large population cannot be resolved, China's demographic problems, such as the imbalanced sex ratio and so-called "aging" that anti-birth control advocates talk about. , will never be resolved. The solution proposed by Fang Fengmei and other anti-birth control groups (abolishing family planning) is, at best, only a temporary solution, and sometimes even counterproductive, unable to cure the symptoms.

Fang Fengmei said that the one-child policy was decided by rocket experts, so who advocated and formulated the policy of abolishing family planning? It's a bunch of liars pretending to be idiots with a high degree and a real idiot with a high degree.