"Witness You Just Made This Jump" | June Event Antiseptic

Author: Crane bitter frog

Editor: Mi Fan

In the last month of the first half of the year, the impact related to the epidemic has not dissipated, and new waves have emerged; and the more violent and turbulent violations of physical, psychological, educational opportunities, and even life safety have been put aside by muddy attachments. Only after the torrential rain in the public opinion field washed away some original appearances;

And whether the original picture is the truth, whether there is only one torrential rain, whether those transcendental powers and violations are being quietly wiped out, whether some people are waiting for the public to forget - the event preservation, from N records, from your and my attention on.

Why are Liu Tao still silent?

Unfinished end index: ☆☆☆☆☆

In May, a lesbian was sexually assaulted by a male colleague after drinking, and the speed of filing a case by the Shenzhen police was questioned; in June, #Metoo continued to explode in the public welfare circle, showing us once again that people of all ages and identities , Is it still possible to "build a better society" (the slogan of the Yifang Public Welfare Foundation) for direct physical sexual assaults in various industries?

Liu Tao, who has been called a "new star of public welfare" by many media, has caused a huge rebound in public relations in the public welfare circle since his sexual assault case was exposed in early June: on the 9th, Shanghai Lianquan Public Welfare Foundation, Beijing Ginkgo Public Welfare Fund, Shaoguan Rural Revitalization Public Welfare Foundation, etc. have all issued statements of concern about this matter - but many public relations statements have caused heated discussions due to the follow-up treatment. On the 15th, 4 victims of Liu Tao's sexual harassment and sexual assault incidents filed a real-name complaint against Liu Tao to the Ginkgo Foundation . refuse .

On the 19th, Ginkgo announced to the society that because Liu Tao unilaterally rescinded the agreement, the foundation would not have the legal basis to continue handling the case. It took less than 12 hours from Liu Tao's proposal to cancel the agreement to the foundation's announcement; however, the four real-name complainants had expected Ginkgo to release relevant news a few days ago, but they were only mentioned on the 19th, and they would complain. The three demands were changed to two .

On the 24th, Li Beiwei, secretary general of the Yifang Public Welfare Foundation, immediately removed the two from the group chat because of the group friends Li Sipan and Zhang Tingting talking about the Liu Tao incident in the "Jing'e Plan" WeChat group established by the foundation.

Until the time of writing, the perpetrator, Liu Tao, remained silent , and so far the only public conclusion given after contacting both parties was an unofficial statement issued by some "Ginkgo Partners", stating that " the information that can be obtained from multiple parties " information, our team chooses to believe and support the victim ."

In addition to the unfinished follow-up of the Liu Tao case, Lei Chuang, a well-known public welfare person who was accused of sexually assaulting volunteers, was revealed to be an intern in Guangdong Jinqiao Baixin Law Firm as a lawyer. Feminist activist and designer Xiao Meili and Hua Hua, the victim of the incident, communicated with the law firm on the 22nd and 24th and submitted a written complaint letter; the incident followers also released the "Real-name Joint Signature| The article "Resist Sexual Assaulter Lei Chuang to Be a Lawyer" was published, but Xiao Meili received 7 calls from the law firm and asked to delete the article 9 times an hour after the release; in the evening, the law firm issued a statement saying that the labor relationship with Lei Chuang had been terminated immediately. , and pointed out that Xiao Meili's article "is false" and may cause "infringement".

As for whether people who have "convictions" can have their own new lives, netizens have discussed this: some people think "why don't people leave a way to live", "the joint activity is not the original intention of the party involved (the victim), but only the needs of the movement. Some people think that as far as the Lei Chuang incident is concerned, it is unacceptable to "be a lawyer without surrendering." Huahua himself responded to the incident, saying that he should not be "imagined as a person who is powerless and manipulated, and at the same time predicts." Let others suppress my voice", "Why do you think that only I can decide whether Lei Chuang still has a way to live? ... The moment I found out that he had become a lawyer again, my emotional reaction was not hatred but envy. It was only two years ago. , I can do it again every two years, and I also want such an easy life.”

In the case related to sexual assault in June, in addition to adults in the workplace and public welfare circles, there were also minors who were unfortunately involved. On June 30 last year, the plaintiff, Ms. Wang, reported to the police that her daughter was molested by a man (Wang Zhenhua, chairman of Xincheng Holdings) when her daughter was taken by a friend (Zhou Yanfen) from her hometown in Jiangsu to stay in a hotel in Shanghai. On 6.17 last month, the Shanghai Putuo District People's Court made a first-instance judgment on Wang Zhenhua's case, and sentenced the defendant Wang Zhenhua to five years in prison for child molestation. Instead of rape, according to China's "Criminal Law", the perpetrator will only be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of more than five years if he molests a child "in a crowd or in public" ; then Wang Zhenhua's attorney, Chen Youxi, stated that he will be punished in the second instance. It strives for an acquittal trial, and the appraisal result of its Beijing judicial institution is contrary to the Shanghai appraisal result. As soon as the news came out, it caused a public outcry. Phoenix.com once launched an online poll "What do you think of Wang Zhenhua's 5-year sentence for molesting a girl", showing that 90% of netizens thought the sentence was too light; after that, more than 10 child protection agencies jointly signed an appeal, "heavy and serious." Sentencing Wang Zhenhua", "Protect all child victims and reduce sexual crimes". Under the relevant article on the official account of "Children's Hope Rescue", there were more than 700 comments, saying "calling for a second instance and a retrial, and sentenced according to the crime of rape or the application of the maximum penalty".

Maybe Liu Taos are not really gone. They are only temporarily hidden, and when the wind is weak, they will turn into Lei Chuang and prepare to start a new life. In domestic cases of sexual harassment and sexual assault, the victims are often at risk of being sued for reputational damage because of the difficult legal environment and the social atmosphere of power abuse. If there is no more people to pay attention and supervise, I am afraid that Wang Zhenhua and others are just the tip of the iceberg.

"Three drinks penalty" and "reverse"?

Unfinished end index: ☆☆☆☆

In addition to the physical transgression and offense, in June there were also a group of life records that were replaced and exchanged. The closed loop formed by the tyranny of a person's life opportunities, the loopholes in the system and the covetousness of people, tightly closed. On a few (perhaps more) peasant women.

At the end of May, Chen Chunxiu from Guanxian County, Liaocheng, Shandong reported to Shandong University of Technology that he had been impersonated by Chen Moumou to go to university in 2004; and expressed that he hoped to go to the Education Bureau and the Sports Bureau to inquire about the college entrance examination information, and was told that he needed to prove " I am myself" , and after reporting the situation to the local public security, discipline inspection commission and other departments, they did not get an effective reply.

On 6.22, Gou Jing broke the news that her chance to go to college had been replaced and stolen by the head teacher's daughter. After the incident was exposed, his head teacher Qiu Yinlin went from Jining, Shandong to Huzhou, Zhejiang to try to meet with Gou Jing. After Gou Jing refused, she said on the Internet that her address was hardly disclosed to others, and she was "extremely afraid"; The open letter disclosed that some people believed that she "destroyed the positive image of Jining", and that relatives and friends were pressured to ask Gou Jing to delete posts. Gou Jing then apologized on the Internet, leaving a message saying, "I want to make my relatives and friends embarrassed and implicate their children because I seek justice for myself? No matter how hard I suffer, I can endure it, and let my relatives and friends be implicated, I... …”

On 6.30, some netizens discovered that the way for "China Higher Education Students" (referred to as Xuexin.com, is the only educational qualification inquiry website certified by the Ministry of Education) has changed. In the past, only ID cards could be used to inquire, but now it requires ID cards and Only the information of the graduate school can be inquired. Recently, those who were replaced in the college entrance examination such as Chen Chunxiu found out that they were replaced when Xuexin.com inquired about the information, so some netizens questioned this; and Xuexin.com responded on 7.1 that the change was made in May 2019. A "normal technical work" implemented; however, while some netizens said that they had changed at the end of last year when they inquired, supporting the response, some netizens said that they had not found any changes when they inquired in May 2020.

Since then, Shandong Province has responded to the Chen Chunxiu case and the Gou Jing case one after another. However, the results of the Chen Chunxiu case announced that, except for the replacement and the replacement's father, the rest of the people involved were almost only "subject to party discipline and political discipline" or "reduced retirement benefits". , and did not announce any compensation to the replaced person. Zhou Pengan, the commentator who created the term "naked official" commented on the matter: "It's just "three drinks of fines".

Recently, the investigation results of the Gou Jing case have been released one after another, and some of the results are inconsistent with Gou Jing's own statement, such as "exaggerating the scores of the college entrance examination", etc. However, the fact that the head teacher Qiu Yinlin ordered his daughter to replace Gou Jing still holds true. In this regard, the party, Gou Jing, later posted a Weibo, clearly stating that "there are still some reservations about the current investigation results". In the process of gradually verifying the information, the People's Daily published a news titled "Some facts are reversed", and a large number of netizens denounced and questioned Gou Jing. On the other side, some netizens posted comments on the Moments made by the online critic "Wang Wusi": Discussing whether Gou Jing's grades are good or not is like discussing whether a girl who has been raped is coquettish or not.

"witnessed you just made the jump":

Unfinished end index: ☆☆☆☆☆

On the 4th, Miao Kexin, a fifth-grade primary school student in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, fell to her death after her composition class. Her parents said that the teacher criticized the child's composition for "transmitting positive energy", and drew a lot of deletion and modification marks on the composition, suspecting that the incident might be related to the child. Falling from the building; on the morning of the 7th, the joint investigation team of the incident had concluded that "there was no situation of abusing and beating students in the classroom that day", and later added that the teacher only wrote in the notebook "transmitting positive energy" "Five words; Miao Kexin's parents all questioned this. After that, Miao Kexin’s mother kept posting on the Weibo account of “Miao Kexin is the most adorable in the world”, begging for a thorough investigation of the truth. On June 12, she posted a Weibo to clearly point out the time line of the incident. Deputy Minister of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs) Stop spreading rumors” and “Please don’t pour dirty water on children”, which continued to cause heated discussions on the Internet.

On the 18th, the Education Bureau of Jintan District, Changzhou issued a notice saying that it would formally investigate the matter. On July 3, Miao Kexin's mother once again posted on Weibo to question "Why has the investigation team's investigation of Yuan Dengmei been delayed for half a month?" As of the deadline, the popularity of the incident continued to decrease, but no relevant results have been released yet. No progress announcement.

"The flood is quiet this year"?

Rotten tail index: ?

In early June, Guangxi suffered continuous heavy rainfall. The affected population exceeded 320,000. One person died due to the disaster. The streets of Yangshuo were flooded. Since then, 26 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) including Guizhou, Guangdong, Hunan, Jiangxi and Chongqing also experienced large-scale torrential rains and floods. The Qijiang River in Chongqing experienced the largest flood peak since 1998, which has affected 100,000 people.

According to the National Defense General Data, as of June 26, the flood-affected population reached 13.74 million person-times, more than 80 people died or disappeared, and the direct economic loss reached 27.8 billion yuan. However, this flood, which has set a new disaster record in China, was rarely seen in public discussions before July.

In early June, historian Qin Hui recorded a WeChat article about the flood in Yangshuo, which received some attention; on June 16, the self-media "Elephant Guild" published an article "This Year's Flood Is Quiet" on the public account platform, revealing the dead silence of the public opinion field. . Duan Media pointed out in its report "The "Invisible" Floods on the 29th that under the "official media domination", the "sense of presence" of floods in social media is weak, and many related videos are presented in an overhead angle, resulting in The painful details of the disaster cannot be presented.

Beijing Youth Daily said on the 21st that the water level in the reservoir area of the Three Gorges Dam is "close to 147 meters, which is nearly two meters above the flood control limit." The rumor-refuting platform of the Central Cyberspace Administration of China quickly issued a document saying, "Monitoring shows that the Three Gorges Project is operating reliably and safely."

Cyber (Cyber World) "Did You Get It"?

Rotten tail index: ?

On the evening of 6.19, some netizens found that Li Wenliang's over one million Weibo comment area was cleared and he could no longer comment. Some netizens sighed, "The Jewish Wailing Wall has stood for 2000 years, and the Chinese have 4 months." Later, when the protests became louder and louder, some people found that they could access the comments of the previous day until the 20th of the next day. , all comments are visible, but all comments are only sorted by time, and all hot comments disappear . In response, the Weibo administrator responded that "the anti-black production and anti-spam comment strategy failed on the evening of the 19th, and some Weibo comments were displayed abnormally. After receiving the feedback, the repair was completed within 1 hour. deletion".

On the 25th of the next week, the Weibo account "Beijing News We Video", a Weibo account dominated by the Beijing News, was reported by netizens, who believed that its report on the epidemic in Beijing was "out of context". It issued instructions, ordering Sina Weibo to ban the "Beijing News Our Video", and said that everyone is welcome to jointly maintain the network environment and "report relevant issues to the relevant departments."

The online whistleblower ethos has further developed into a substantive impact:

Rotten tail index: ?

On June 20, Professor Liang Yanping of Hubei University was expelled from the party and stopped teaching. Hubei University issued a notice stating that because Professor Liang had posted and reposted remarks such as "Japan-related" and "Hong Kong-related" on social network platforms, it was punished for this notification. Previously, Professor Liang received attention because of his support for Fang Fang. He was also accused of mourning Zhou Tsile, a college student who fell from a building during Hong Kong's anti-extradition movement, on WeChat last year. In addition, professors such as Liu Chuan'e, Dean of the School of Letters of Hubei University, Jing Ya, a professor of Nanchang University, and Tan Bang, Deputy Dean of the School of Letters of Central China Normal University, have all received attention for publishing articles on the Internet that criticize the domestic system.

Millions of film practitioners "need to survive":

Unfinished end index: ☆☆☆☆

On June 28, 189,000 new crown patients were diagnosed in one day, which is the largest single-day increase in the world since the outbreak of the epidemic. That is to say, from a global perspective, the epidemic has not only not dissipated, but is in a state of intensification. In China, although it is obvious that the epidemic has been brought under control, the outbreak of Xinfadi in Beijing has once again caused panic and worry among the people, especially those involved in theaters that have been closed for more than 170 days.

With the rest of the industry resuming work, there is still no clear news about the movie theaters in various places. On 6.11, Huang Wei, vice president of Bona Films, fell from a building and died. In the afternoon, Jia Zhangke forwarded the news of Huang Wei's death and called "the sorrow of the industry", and then called on the government to consider allowing theaters to resume production, because millions of film practitioners need Survive. According to statistics from China News Weekly in April, 16 listed film and television companies have announced their first-quarter results, of which 60% are in a state of loss.

Someone "set off to find their favorite" and has not returned so far:

Rotten tail index: ?

In the 709 case in mid-April, human rights lawyer Wang Quanzhang ended his more than 1,000-day prison sentence, but in late June, we saw some familiar people who appeared and disappeared in front of the public.

On the 17th, Xu Yan, the wife of Chinese human rights lawyer Yu Wensheng, said that she had received a call from the Xuzhou City Procuratorate in Jiangsu Province, saying that her husband Yu had been convicted of "inciting subversion of state power" and would be imprisoned for four years and deprived of political rights for three years. , but the court has not previously issued a verdict to lawyers or family members.

On the 19th, the family of citizen journalist Zhang Zhan received an arrest notice on suspicion of "picking quarrels and provoking trouble". He went to Wuhan to write a lot of on-the-spot reports in early February when the epidemic broke out. Before that, there were three citizen journalists, Chen Qiushi, Fang Bin and Li Zehua. Cai Wei and Chen Mei, who have "disappeared" after reporting incidents related to the new crown epidemic in Wuhan, while backing up information about the epidemic, Cai Wei and Chen Mei, whose whereabouts are unknown after being arrested.

On the same day, human rights lawyer Ding Jiaxi, who had been missing since being illegally arrested by Shandong police in Beijing on December 26 last year, was formally arrested on suspicion of "inciting subversion of state power" and will be detained in a remote mountainous area. It is reported that Ding Jiaxi's arrest was related to a gathering of more than 20 human rights lawyers and human rights activists in Xiamen at the end of last year.

"Second Return" under "One Country, Two Systems"?

Rotten tail index: ?

Since the 5.21 National People's Congress preparatory meeting passed the draft of the "National Security Law for Hong Kong," "National Security Law" has become an international keyword for more than a month. In the international friction of "emphasis" and "warning", the confrontation between the two voices can be clearly seen: in the Chinese statement, the "National Security Law" is a "good law" for Hong Kong to "return" a second time and achieve strong social stability. In the statements of the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and Australia, the "National Security Law" undermines "one country, two systems", undermines Hong Kong's "high degree of autonomy", and threatens the human rights of Hong Kong people.

41 days later, the "Hong Kong version of the National Security Law" released the specific provisions for the first time and took effect immediately (the actual time is at 11:00 pm on 6.30). According to the regulations, the work of the National Security Committee established by it will not be interfered by any other institutions, organizations or individuals in Hong Kong. If the work information involves state secrets, public order, etc., it will not be carried out publicly; , Even if a person does not have the status of a Hong Kong resident, even if his "criminal act" is not in Hong Kong, this law shall apply; Article 44 stipulates that the judges who handle cases related to the National Security Law will be selected by Carrie Lam. Judges will not be appointed... Some netizens believe that "one country, two systems" may become a table.

We are a non-profit, independent media that focuses on public issues such as the environment, education, gender/gender, and mental health, and provides responsible documentary content for the public.

Click the link to subscribe to our featured emails: https://jinshuju.net/f/sGicEk