On the abolition of schools

"On the Abolition of Schools"

I mentioned "the source of funding for education" the day before yesterday, to the effect that teachers' salaries may be paid by children or by the state. The former promotes competition and improves the quality of education; when the latter pays, it is like an incentive in mercantilism. , stifling competition, no educational quality.

thought of today

Talents, like commodities, are determined by the law of supply and demand and the pursuit of profit maximization to determine the flow direction. But when the government monopolizes the right to find a job, the supply of talent is the government's responsibility. And now there is a fault in the supply of talents, which is the government's dereliction of duty. This can be done without the government's control, but the government has to manage it and can't manage it well.

In addition, demand is determined by supply, doesn't economics say supply is determined by demand? Education has been outdated for hundreds of years.

In addition, I am thinking that if I want people to flow freely like commodities, I want to ask what is the production, processing, and flow (trade) of talents. Can I create something called educational economics here?

About the production, processing and flow of talents

(Part of childbirth) I would like to ask why parents have children? What profit does having a child give parents? Can you think of your parents as farmers?

(The processing part) Assuming that "people" are "manufactured products", how can "people" be "made"? Can selling manufactured goods give business owners a profit? (I think that the salaries of teachers have been exploited from here, although the salaries of teachers are paid by the state)

(The flowing part) is the openness and transparency of the recruitment information, and there is no relationship, etc.

Think here for a moment