Conspiracy theories against conspiracy theories

Paragraph structure of this article: preface, body, follow-up, summary

foreword

The recent mainland hotspots are very interesting. Officials claim that the Wuhan pneumonia came from a US laboratory, while on-the-spot legislation indicates that any form of surrogacy is prohibited. Then my two "Life out of Nothing" friends also participated in the discussion.

Yesterday, Weibo posted more than a dozen Zheng Shuang surrogacy incidents. It is not very clear why this incident deserves such attention from Weibo. On the same day, CCTV and the Political and Legal Committee ended their positions and stated their positions. Generally, at this time, the artists involved basically announced that their careers were over.

In my opinion, the case of Zheng Shuang is that the man does not obey the moral law. Surrogacy and abandonment are not illegal in China and the United States. They are nothing more than moral disputes. This is a bit like some people criticize the Yulin Dog Meat Festival. And the man secretly recorded and exposed a private matter that was not illegal. This kind of behavior is not just immoral. It would be horrible if everyone's private conversations were to be recorded without authorization. I will not discuss how many similar gray births and abandoned babies there are in China. The official statement is ironic.

text

These two friends of mine basically don't read the information outside the wall, and even if they can get over the wall, they have no interest in knowing the complete truth of the matter. The content of the Chinese official media's official rumors is convinced, so this is the beginning of the following dialogue.

follow-up

Another friend secretly told me that this friend privately chatted that he thought there was something wrong with me. What I always wanted to tell them was not to take sides, and I didn't instill them. As a result, I stopped watching conspiracy theories. I asked him what conspiracy theories I said were conspiracy theories, but he didn't dare to say. Anyway, I am relatively dark , and the official anti-American tone is sunny . I didn't even talk to them about my yin and yang, and I felt that the mainland's words were too narrow to communicate properly. As long as you ask questions, you don't have to object at all, and you will be someone who has problems in the eyes of others.

summary

In fact, my logic is not complete, the main purpose of small talk is to diverge thinking. When the friend with the smiling face mentioned Zheng Shuang yesterday, he immediately said that surrogacy is wrong (disgusting and dirty). I told him that the behavior of exposing privacy was more excessive in my opinion, so he called me a privacy freak. Then I told him that this was a one-sided and biased report. Don't be easily distracted. The whole incident may be complicated. He said that he was only targeting surrogacy, so I checked some information for him and said that China not only does not prohibit surrogacy, but also deleted the clause "prohibiting any form of surrogacy" in 2016. Then the conversation ended here. I don't know if he has thought deeply. It seems that he has not thought about it now. After all, it is still what the official says.

This is the status quo in China. The Chinese have lost the ability to actively seek evidence, dare to question, and "independent thinking" (independent thinking has become a derogatory term, put a quotation mark), so it is possible to generalize in this way.