Where does the anger on the internet come from?

When I was looking at a Zhihu question related to the speed limit of electric bicycles, I suddenly saw a reply, the content is as follows.

The two ordinary replies can be seen everywhere these days. The discourse reveals this arrogance, prejudice, and lack of humility to ask for advice. Social platforms such as Zhihu and Weibo are the most representative.

Ideally, how would you respond? In my opinion, this dialogue should ideally be:

Should a car with a top speed of 40km/h be added with "/h"? The unit of speed is km/h?

The maximum speed here already contains the meaning of "/h", so it is not necessary to add it.

When everyone inevitably touches the blind spot of knowledge, it is necessary to be humble and ask for advice. However, this kind of peaceful discussion atmosphere can no longer be seen on the Internet in mainland China. When opinions disagree, it is inevitable that the tone will be too heavy, even me. It seems that everyone on the social platform defaults that it is impossible to convince others, so it is difficult to calm down, so they send some harsh remarks in order to stimulate the other party. This is what I think is in the minds of the vast majority of people.

There are many types of people in the actual situation. Some people are indeed cutting-edge talents in related fields. Their arrogance is understandable, and the arrogant mentality that no one can match should not be stopped. It can also motivate those who have the ability to gain a sense of achievement to a certain extent. They have made progress, and in reality, there are indeed many people who are perverse. Some people with slightly weaker abilities are unavoidably jealous of the mentality of cutting-edge talents who disdain the crowd. They can point the country and get countless praises. This kind of honor is enviable, and it is inevitable that some will follow suit. In the normal speech environment, there will be some mentor-level people to guide public opinion, which makes people feel ashamed to make up their minds. Unfortunately, public opinion censorship suppresses this kind of voice. Most of these people are called "public knowledge" and stigmatized. After the "public knowledge" movement, the real public knowledge has rarely spoken, and the existing "public knowledge" is not necessarily the original meaning of the public knowledge.

Looking at the above dialogue again, how should Zhang Dalin deal with such an embarrassing and bad scene? There is a high probability of pretending to be invisible and not replying. This question has been blocked, and there is no room for refutation. This will give people a feeling of losing face, but they have lost their dignity in order to retain the last trace of dignity. The attitude of correcting after knowing one's mistakes is also lacking in today's people, but it is a noble character that is respected. So if you want to repair the psychological rift caused by this abrupt reply, apologizing for your ignorance is the right solution. The virtual environment of the Internet always gives people a fluke mentality, thinking that strangers will not have any influence on them, this mentality can easily be brought to reality, and people will make similar treatments when they encounter similar situations, which will give people A sense of irresponsibility.

Emotions are contagious. In a cheerful and peaceful atmosphere, people will feel happy. On the contrary, in a hostile environment, it is good to be depressed, and it is normal to be assimilated by hostile energy. Suppressing the voice of reason, these backlogs of dissatisfaction cannot be vented, and they are vented to indifferent strangers.

There is such a hostile atmosphere in a free speech environment, and of course there will be. Matters also has such hostility. Many of these hostile emotions come from people who have been censored for many years within the wall, and many people in free world countries obviously want to be calm. much more. Most of the people with different opinions under the article also tried their best to suppress their ill-willedness that had nowhere to vent, and invariably maintained the pure land of this Chinese community, which is one of the reasons why there are so many regulars here. You can choose freely, and any topic will have a group of friendly people willing to discuss it with you. If you are dissatisfied, you can leave here. If you like it, you can join the appreciative citizen.

Being able to say some of the real thoughts in your heart without worrying about which word will trigger the censorship mechanism and not come out all day long is a kind of catharsis, a kind of catharsis against all kinds of dissatisfaction within the wall. The article is not necessarily well written, there will be people willing to give encouragement, and there are few offensive words.

I'm still angry, but I'm full of hope.