My thoughts on Hong Kong's "Brave Faction"

Just like the people throwing stones and eggs in this video, do you think other demonstrators don't know the identity of the throwers? At least the core members know, otherwise how to cover and cooperate? If it is really a public security or police officer who is pretending to be a police officer, they will be seen on the spot, and they can be sent away directly. However, is an "undercover" or "saboteur" sent away?

https://twitter.com/reuters/status/1158041150193852416?s=21

Another point is that the participants should not have been masked in the first place. Masking gave the police an opportunity to send undercover agents and made teammates suspicious of each other. Moreover, you are masked, and the underworld in white clothes are also masked, and the police do not issue warrants. Who benefits from such a melee and fishing in troubled waters regardless of identity? It's definitely good for the bad guys, not good for the upright.

I agree with Mr. Hu Ping's opinion, don't promote weaknesses and avoid strengths

https://twitter.com/huping1/status/1155324842641674240?s=21

In addition, the masked protest itself violates the principles of integrity, decency, and unity of power and responsibility. If you think that your behavior is not against the law or civil resistance, you can argue for reasons. Like Dimitrov's generous statement in court, you can also resist unreasonable laws... But masking is not a disguised admission of shameful and illegal crimes. ?

https://twitter.com/zhengyichangcun/status/1161401203852546048?s=21

Judging from the various words and deeds of the Hong Kong protesters, they are not at the same moral level as the civil rights movement in Europe and the United States. In the 1960s, American anti-war youths were proud of being imprisoned; black civil rights activists would rather be bullied like in the picture and insist on non-violence; there were also the May storm in France, and even the students in Latin America who faced massacres... all are fair and bright How can there be such a sly and cunning one like Hong Kong who evades responsibility

https://twitter.com/breathenewwinds/status/1086717615257509888?s=21

Even those who talk about violence, such as Spain's ETA, Japan's Red Army, Germany's Red Brigade, Italy's Red Army faction, and the violent branch of the black civil rights movement in the United States... are all responsible for themselves, with clear targets and ruthless attacks, but only for the most wicked. , Political kidnapping considers the pros and cons... Although I don't agree with the actions of these people, they are still brave, resourceful and responsible, and the "Brave Faction" in Hong Kong is more like the local road during the Anti-Japanese War...

What are the characteristics of Tuba Road? Only do some damage that has little practical effect, and can't damage much of the main Japanese army at all; greedy for life and fear of death, only caring about pulling troops and expanding influence, not understanding, not being able to do it, and not daring to do "the first priority to hurt the enemy", and then plainclothes The guerrillas ran away, and the common people were "sweeped" and "cleaned up", hiding their identity and letting the common people suffer...

This can neither harm the enemy, but also selfishly flees for life, and increases the danger of innocent people.

Contrast these people in Hong Kong again. They are not really brave enough to make deadly attacks and shake the ruling class; daily confrontations are masked and run fast, and then the police may not be able to catch the strong attackers, those who are flanking and not. Those who did violent acts, including many women and students, became the target of the police to vent their anger and find scapegoats. In addition to escalating the confrontation between the two sides and smearing moderate pan-democrats, how much help do these people contribute to actual political reform?

Also, even if these brave, local and Hong Kong independence factions do win and come to power, how will they govern Hong Kong with their IQ? Is it like the CCP that entered the city or Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union? The traditional pan-democrats have a systematic political, economic and social reform plan. The policy program is meticulous and feasible, but it is difficult to implement because of the interests of the establishment. In addition to clamoring slogans, expressing xenophobia, and talking about "revolution", what kind of practical ability does the valiant faction have in governing the city?

If you commented that the Yongwu faction "has not built enough and destroyed more than it", it has actually been overestimated. Its "destruction" is also insufficient, and the direction of destruction is even more misguided.

As for the real direction, the revolutionaries in the late Qing Dynasty and the left-wing armed forces in Spain and Latin America have all given answers. But the valiant faction is probably incapable and afraid to follow suit.

But now, there is neither "standing" nor a real "breaking" brave faction, and only smashing vases is left.