Copying and pasting without the source is plagiarism. Is it difficult to understand?

For the freshly released super event, my whole person is on fire. No, it should be said that it is adding fuel to the fire. Before this inexplicable shameful full text copy and paste the event, I was already on fire.

It happened a week ago, and by chance, I will see a new event called Attack! Dream drummer, generally speaking, I will definitely support and want to participate in this event, but when I browsed the rules of the event, I saw the way of matching the prize money

There's a damn familiar feeling at the moment, I thought I clicked into a new community event, how could I go back to my community proposal? After reading the title, I found out that the bonus rules of this proposal and the city celebration shook! are exactly the same.

To be honest, the rules part of the proposal text, everyone refers to it for reference, but after modification, the proposer will still mention at the end of the text the format of which previous proposer has been referenced, which is not a big deal, but, but, @ Yu Hao / Editor-in-Chief of Japanese and Japanese Youth May I ask if your time is as limited as mine or is your brainpower as limited as mine?

It’s okay to copy and paste the rules without mentioning whose format it is referring to. What’s the matter with copying and pasting even this obviously super personal tone ?

I left a message a week ago as a reminder, but after a week there was no response or modification. Do you think it’s okay to copy and paste it directly without citing the source because writing the rules is not considered creation ?

As I said in the message:

If you want to copy and paste it word by word, you need to tag the original author , otherwise, we discussed plagiarism for a long time and discussed the sadness?

I know some people might think, "Does it just need to be fussy about the rules?"

Of course not! I didn't plan to write an article about this. Generally speaking, our expectation is that after we leave a message, the other party will make changes. However, since I left a message reminder at the end of July, the other party has not responded at all, nor has it To make any changes, I originally thought that maybe the editor hadn't been on Matters for a few days, but the fact is that he is still posting, and he just doesn't want to respond, which really makes me super upset!

The editor may have thought it was just a standard rule, so he directly posted it. After all, the rules are not creations, but a lot of plagiarism comes from this indifferent mentality of "it's just xxx anyway, so copying and pasting will be fine"?

What's more, the sentence limited by the organizer's time and brainpower has nothing to do with the rules. Again, I have limited brain power, do you too? Even if you are, you have to put it another way.

"Just copy and paste the rules, not copy and paste the creation, is it necessary to make a big fuss?"

I just want to ask: "You can't even write the rules yourself, and you can't do something as simple as copy and paste the source. Do you want to talk about creation?"

what! I forgot to mention that the deadline for this proposal is also Canadian Eastern Time... Do you also live in Canada? Then 12:00 a.m. Eastern Canada time will be 12:00 noon in Taiwan the next day . Please copy and paste it and modify it carefully. With all due respect: this kind of proposal text makes me feel very casual.